Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Diagnosis codes underestimate chronic kidney disease incidence compared with eGFR-based evidence: a retrospective observational study of patients with type 2 diabetes in UK primary care

Rose Sisk, Rory Cameron, Waqas Tahir and Camilla Sammut-Powell
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (1): BJGPO.2023.0079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0079
Rose Sisk
1 Gendius Ltd, Alderley Edge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rose Sisk
  • For correspondence: rosesisk@hotmail.com
Rory Cameron
1 Gendius Ltd, Alderley Edge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rory Cameron
Waqas Tahir
2 Affinity Care, National Health Service, Bradford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Camilla Sammut-Powell
1 Gendius Ltd, Alderley Edge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Camilla Sammut-Powell
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Flowchart of patient inclusions and exclusions
  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. Among people with type 2 diabetes and no previous evidence of CKD stage G3–5, (A) The incidence rates of CKD diagnosis via a diagnosis code (code), eGFR-based criteria (lab) or at least one of these (either), and their 95% confidence intervals. (B) Rates of eGFR measurement, by fiscal year. CKD = chronic kidney disease. eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Characteristics of patient cohort at the time of cohort entry
    VariablePatients with T2D and no previous evidence of CKD stages G3–5 (n = 32 276)
    Median age, years (IQR)60 (50–70)
    Sex, n (%)
     Female13 865 (43.0)
     Male18 411 (57.0)
    Median duration of follow-up, years (IQR)5.01 (2.31–6.00)
    Median duration of diabetes, years (IQR)1.8 (0.0–7.0)
    CKD diagnosis code, n (%)1463 (4.5)
    Median time to diagnosis code, years (IQR)3.10 (1.49–5.41)
    eGFR-based CKD, n (%)2667 (8.3)
    Median time to lab-based CKD, years (IQR)2.66 (1.26–4.41)
    Lab-based or coded CKD, n (%)3102 (9.6)
    Median time to lab-based or coded CKD, years (IQR)2.52 (1.12–4.36)
    Deprivation decile, n (%)
     1–2 (highly deprived)13 945 (43.2)
     3–46070 (18.8)
     5–63309 (10.3)
     7–10 (least deprived)8952 (27.7)
    General practices, n 60
    Median number of patients per practice (IQR)472 (277–603)
    • CKD = chronic kidney disease. eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate. IQR = interquartile range. T2D = type 2 diabetes.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals from a logistic regression model to identify factors associated with diagnostic coding of eGFR-based cases
    VariableGroupOR (95% CI)P value
    Age0.973 (0.963 to 0.982)0.00
    SexFemale (ref)
    Male1.069 (0.913, to1.252)0.41
    Duration of diabetes, years0.999 (0.991 to 1.008)0.89
    Deprivation decile1–2 (ref)
    3–41.090 (0.945 to 1.257)0.24
    5–61.028 (0.865 to 1.222)0.75
    7–100.942 (0.773 to 1.148)0.55
    eGFR stageG3A (ref)
    G3B1.206 (0.932 to 1.559)0.15
    G41.796 (1.074 to 3.046)0.03
    G51.023 (0.365 to 2.859)0.97
    Time between qualifying eGFRs, months0.853 (0.647 to 1.124)0.26
    Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratioNot measured (ref)
    A11.298 (1.081 to 1.559)0.01
    A21.078 (0.855 to 1.360)0.52
    A31.310 (0.904 to 1.904)0.15
    HbA1c controlControlled (ref)
    Uncontrolled1.105 (0.920 to 1.329)0.29
    Unmeasured1.502 (1.163 to 1.941)0.00
    History of cardiovascular disease1.080 (0.878 to 1.329)0.46
    Prescribed antihypertensives0.980 (0.795 to 1.210)0.85
    Prescribed statins0.995 (0.845 to 1.172)0.95
    Prescribed insulin1.194 (0.965 to 1.478)0.10
    Prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors0.904 (0.563, to 1.447)0.67
    • eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate. SGLT2 = sodium-glucose co-transporter-2.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Number of patients with eGFR-based chronic kidney disease (CKD) and a CKD diagnosis code, the proportion that occurred on or after their second qualifying eGFR measurement and the time between the second qualifying eGFR measurement and entry of a diagnostic code
    VariableGroupPatients, nDiagnosis code after eGFR-based CKD, n (%)Median time from eGFR-based CKD to CKD diagnosis code, months (IQR)
    Age group, years
    <4031 (33.3)0.7 (0.7–0.7)
    40–491911 (57.9)2.9 (1.9–9.6)
    50–5911156 (50.5)8.9 (1.1–16.3)
    60–69298156 (52.3)10.9 (2.0–28.2)
    70–79496293 (59.1)9.9 (1.0–24.8)
    ≥80283151 (53.4)8.9 (0.9–20.6)
    Sex
    Female566319 (56.4)10.6 (1.1–24.1)
    Male644349 (54.2)9.0 (1.2–24.3)
    Duration of T2DM
    <1 year7748 (62.3)11.8 (0.8–26.2)
    1–2 years6944 (63.8)10.1 (2.0–27.2)
    2–5 years17794 (53.1)7.6 (0.7–26.1)
    5–10 years359179 (49.9)9.7 (1.1–21.4)
    >10 years528303 (57.4)10.2 (1.5–23.2)
    CKD stage
    G3A1025569 (55.5)9.9 (1.2–25.3)
    G3B13978 (56.1)10.2 (1.2–20.4)
    G43817 (44.7)7.3 (0.7–16.6)
    G584 (50.0)7.2 (2.8–21.5)
    TotalOverall1210668 (55.2)9.8 (1.2–24.3)
    • eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate. CKD = chronic kidney disease. IQR = interuartile range. T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Supplementary Data

  • RS_10.3399BJGPO.2023.0079_supp.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 8, Issue 1
April 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnosis codes underestimate chronic kidney disease incidence compared with eGFR-based evidence: a retrospective observational study of patients with type 2 diabetes in UK primary care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Diagnosis codes underestimate chronic kidney disease incidence compared with eGFR-based evidence: a retrospective observational study of patients with type 2 diabetes in UK primary care
Rose Sisk, Rory Cameron, Waqas Tahir, Camilla Sammut-Powell
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (1): BJGPO.2023.0079. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0079

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnosis codes underestimate chronic kidney disease incidence compared with eGFR-based evidence: a retrospective observational study of patients with type 2 diabetes in UK primary care
Rose Sisk, Rory Cameron, Waqas Tahir, Camilla Sammut-Powell
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (1): BJGPO.2023.0079. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0079
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • diabetes
  • renal medicine
  • renal insufficiency, chronic
  • Primary health care

More in this TOC Section

  • General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review
  • How GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients: a qualitative study of GP–patient consultations
  • Acne management in Norway: general practitioner and dermatologist prescriptions (2012-2019), a nationwide overview
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795