Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • CONFERENCE
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
BJGP Open
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • CONFERENCE
Practice & Policy

Telehealth and primary care: a special collection from BJGP Open

Sarah J White and Hajira Dambha-Miller
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (4): BJGPO.2022.0120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0120
Sarah J White
1 Centre for Social Impact, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah J White
  • For correspondence: sarah.white@unsw.edu.au
Hajira Dambha-Miller
2 BJGP Open, Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hajira Dambha-Miller
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
  • Telehealth
  • Primary care
  • General practice
  • Telemedicine
  • Remote consultation

In this BJGP Open special issue, we explore how increased reliance on telehealth has changed clinical practice. Telehealth, defined as the provision of healthcare remotely through telecommunications technology, has been integrated into health services with varying degrees of success in the past. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated this process, with telehealth presenting a solution to care delivery during national lockdowns and social distancing requirements. There has been vast amounts of research examining what has worked, potential improvements, and what should be retained in the post-pandemic world. This collection of articles adds to the discourse and considers telehealth in three broad areas: access to services, quality of care, and conducting consultations.

A central suggestion in favour of continued investment in telehealth is the increased access that it provides to services. Three of the articles in this collection report on improvements in access through telehealth, while also acknowledging that increased planning and investment at a system level is required to ensure usability and equitability.1–3 Some of these barriers to access are not unique to telehealth; consideration of the additional complexity that telehealth can present to accessing care is essential. When the system is designed to support telehealth access, the benefits for patients are realised, as shown by Bhatti et al.4

This leads on to our articles on the quality of care when using telehealth. Variations in care quality are a continued concern for what has become an expanded and extended use of telehealth services. Some care is not substantively impacted by its use,5 however continued examination of differences in practice are needed to support safe, high quality telehealth care.6 Rosen et al and Shaw et al explore ways of mitigating risk for effective use of telehealth, particularly through inclusion and support strategies.7,8 Similar to increased access, these strategies require system level support to adequately maintain quality of care across different modes of delivery.

At a more local level, conducting consultations in a way that provides quality of care is important for the ongoing integration of telehealth into routine practice.9–11 Continued investment in evidence-based approaches to training is needed to support doctors in conducting consultations using telehealth.12,13 Such support and training enables effective use of telehealth in practice, ensuring the doctor–patient relationship remains at the centre of care delivery. In detailing their multi-methods study design, White et al provide a glimpse into the future of telehealth research.14 This is achieved by bringing together different lenses to examine telehealth in practice, including using evidence to support co-design of guidelines.

The collection is completed with an editorial that considers the future of telehealth in Australia.15 Many of the considerations are transferable to other international health systems especially with regards to, for example, the need for ‘telehealth literacy’ among consumers and providers. Reflecting findings from articles in this collection, such an argument can be broadened to capture the entirety of the health system – that is, from the patient–provider consultation to the local and national governance. Improved telehealth literacy would be made possible through policies that not only fund increased access and infrastructure, but that also prioritise research and education.

Telehealth is a continuously evolving space, with technologies, priorities, policies, and doctor and patient preferences all changing at different paces. The articles in this collection capture a moment in time where health systems, still under pressure from an ongoing pandemic, explore the role and impact of telehealth as lessons from the necessary fast-paced adoption of telehealth become integrated into everyday care. As more research is conducted reflecting not only on what has occurred during the first years of the pandemic but also on the continued use of telehealth, there is an opportunity to critically appraise and refine how telehealth is managed at a system level to conduct consultations that enable increased access to services and allow for provision of high quality care.

Notes

Funding

No funding was received for this article.

Competing interests

Dr Sarah White co-authored two of the articles in the Telehealth special issue. These were managed by Dr Hajira Dambha-Miller as the Editor-in-Chief of BJGP Open. This article was accepted by HDM as Editor-in-Chief and has not been externally peer reviewed.

Provenance

Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

disclosure

Disclosure

  • Received August 18, 2022.
  • Revision received August 18, 2022.
  • Accepted August 23, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hardie R-A,
    2. Sezgin G,
    3. Imai C,
    4. Gault E,
    5. et al.
    (2022) Telehealth-based diagnostic testing in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study. BJGP Open 6 (1), doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0123, pmid:34819295. BJGPO.2021.0123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Stewart J,
    2. McCorry N,
    3. Reid H,
    4. Hart N,
    5. et al.
    (2022) Implementation of remote asthma consulting in general practice in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: an evaluation using extended normalisation process theory. BJGP Open 6 (1), doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0189, pmid:34862167. BJGPO.2021.0189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Brown LR,
    2. Williams AJ,
    3. Shaw K,
    4. Ozakinci G,
    5. et al.
    (2022) Information-seeking behaviours and uncertainty around accessing primary care in the changing landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. BJGP Open 6 (1), doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0151, pmid:34853007. BJGPO.2021.0151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bhatti S,
    2. Dahrouge S,
    3. Muldoon L,
    4. Rayner J
    (2022) Virtual care in Ontario community health centres: a cross-sectional study to understand changes in care delivery. BJGP Open doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0239, pmid:35228196. BJGPO.2021.0239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Imai C,
    2. Thomas J,
    3. Hardie R-A,
    4. Pearce C,
    5. et al.
    (2022) Telehealth use in patients with type 2 diabetes in australian general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study. BJGP Open doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0200, pmid:35640964. BJGPO.2021.0200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wabe N,
    2. Thomas J,
    3. Sezgin G,
    4. Sheikh MK,
    5. et al.
    (2022) Medication prescribing in face-to-face versus telehealth consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practice: a retrospective observational study. BJGP Open 6 (1), doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0132, pmid:34819296. BJGPO.2021.0132.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rosen R,
    2. Wieringa S,
    3. Greenhalgh T,
    4. Leone C,
    5. et al.
    (2022) Clinical risk in remote consultations in general practice: findings from in-COVID-19 pandemic qualitative research. BJGP Open doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0204, pmid:35487581. BJGPO.2021.0204.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Shaw SCK,
    2. Davis L-J,
    3. Doherty M
    (2022) Considering autistic patients in the era of telemedicine: the need for an adaptable, equitable, and compassionate approach. BJGP Open 6 (1), doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0174, pmid:35074849. BJGPO.2021.0174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. De Guzman KR,
    2. Snoswell CL,
    3. Giles CM,
    4. Smith AC,
    5. et al.
    (2022) GP perceptions of telehealth services in Australia: a qualitative study. BJGP Open 6 (1), doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0182, pmid:34819294. BJGPO.2021.0182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Verma P,
    2. Kerrison R
    (2022) Patients’ and physicians’ experiences with remote consultations in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-method rapid review of the literature. BJGP Open doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0192, pmid:35031558. BJGPO.2021.0192.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wanat M,
    2. Hoste ME,
    3. Gobat NH,
    4. Anastasaki M,
    5. et al.
    (2022) Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the primary care consultations for acute respiratory infections during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: an eight-country qualitative study in Europe. BJGP Open doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0172, pmid:35031559. BJGPO.2021.0172.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Al-Bedaery R,
    2. Chaudhry UAR,
    3. Jones M,
    4. Noble L,
    5. et al.
    (2022) Undergraduate medical teaching with remote consultations in general practice: a realist evaluation. BJGP Open doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0185, pmid:35210228. BJGPO.2021.0185.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Mughal F,
    2. Atherton H,
    3. Awan H,
    4. Kingstone T,
    5. et al.
    (2022) The impact of remote consultations on brief conversations in general practice. BJGP Open doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0199, pmid:35217511. BJGPO.2021.0199.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. White SJ,
    2. Nguyen A,
    3. Roger P,
    4. Tse T,
    5. et al.
    (2022) Experiences of telehealth in general practice in Australia: research protocol for a mixed-methods study. BJGP Open 6 (1), doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0187, pmid:34880033. BJGPO.2021.0187.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Willcock SM,
    2. Cartmill JA,
    3. Tse T,
    4. White SJ,
    5. et al.
    (2022) How will telehealth change primary care in Australia? BJGP Open 6 (1), doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0186, pmid:35074848. BJGPO.2021.0186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 6, Issue 4
December 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Telehealth and primary care: a special collection from BJGP Open
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Telehealth and primary care: a special collection from BJGP Open
Sarah J White, Hajira Dambha-Miller
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (4): BJGPO.2022.0120. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0120

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Telehealth and primary care: a special collection from BJGP Open
Sarah J White, Hajira Dambha-Miller
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (4): BJGPO.2022.0120. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0120
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • telehealth
  • primary care
  • general practice
  • telemedicine
  • remote consultation

More in this TOC Section

  • Like, comment, subscribe: How journal editors can navigate social media competing interests
  • The BJGP Open Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of 2022: an editorial
Show more Practice & Policy

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2023 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795