Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • CONFERENCE
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
BJGP Open
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • CONFERENCE
Research

Views about primary care health checks for autistic adults: UK survey findings

David Mason, Helen Taylor, Barry Ingham, Tracy Finch, Colin Wilson, Clare Scarlett, Anna Urbanowicz, Christina Nicolaidis, Nicholas Lennox, Sebastian Moss, Carole Buckley, Sally-Ann Cooper, Malcom Osborne, Deborah Garland, Dora Raymaker and Jeremy R Parr
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (4): BJGPO.2022.0067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0067
David Mason
1 Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Taylor
1 Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry Ingham
1 Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Morpeth, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Barry Ingham
  • For correspondence: barry.ingham@cntw.nhs.uk
Tracy Finch
3 Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin Wilson
1 Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clare Scarlett
4 NHS Newcastle Gateshead Clinical Commissioning Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
5 NHS North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Urbanowicz
6 Queensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability, MRI-UQ, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
7 Social and Global Studies Centre, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Nicolaidis
8 School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA
9 Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christina Nicolaidis
Nicholas Lennox
6 Queensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability, MRI-UQ, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Moss
10 NHS Northumberland Clinical Commissioning Group, Morpeth, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carole Buckley
11 Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally-Ann Cooper
12 Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malcom Osborne
13 The Kayaks support group, South Shields, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah Garland
14 National Autistic Society, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dora Raymaker
15 Regional Research Institute for Human Services, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy R Parr
1 Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Morpeth, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Representation of the categories for (A) 'What would make a health check easier to access?' and (B) 'What would make a health check more challenging to access?'

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Participant characteristics
    CharacteristicFrequency, n (%)
    Total participants458
    Age, years
     18–2547 (10.3)
     26–40148 (32.3)
     41–60202 (44.1)
     ≥6161 (13.3)
    Sex
     Male183 (40.0)
     Female244 (53.3)
     Did not report as male or femalea 14 (3.0)
     No response17 (3.7%)
    Qualifications achievedb
     Postgraduate degree74 (16.2)
     Bachelor’s degree163 (35.6)
     Diploma of higher education59 (12.9)
     Certificate of higher education49 (10.7)
     A-level or equivalent245 (53.5)
     General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE)341 (74.5)
     Basic skills87 (19.0)
     No formal qualifications39 (8.5)
     Other76 (16.6)
    Employment statusb
     Employed without support142 (31.0)
     Employed with support6 (1.3)
     Self-employed36 (7.9)
     Volunteer58 (12.7)
     Unemployed194 (42.4)
     Retired25 (5.5)
     Other78 (17.0)
    Autism diagnosis
     Formal diagnosis392 (85.6)
     Suspected or unsure or awaiting assessment66 (14.4)
     Mean age at diagnosis (SD; range)37.7 (15.6; 2.0–68.0)
    SRS score by severity categoryc
     Normal9 (2.3)
     Mild38 (9.6)
     Moderate121 (30.6)
     Severe227 (57.5)
     No response63 (13.8%)
     Mean (SD)116 (26)
    Intellectual disabilityd
     Formal diagnosis28 (6.1)
     Suspected33 (7.2)
    Type of secondary school attendedb
     Mainstream school424 (92.6)
     Specialist schooling (at any time)54 (11.8)
    Statement of special educational needs
     Yes60 (13.1)
     No362 (79.0)
     Don’t know32 (7.0)
     No response4 (0.9)
    Additional help with learning received at mainstream schoolb
     No help349 (76.2)
     Classroom support35 (7.6)
     One-to-one instruction22 (4.8)
     Extra time for exams53 (11.6)
     Special equipment13 (2.8)
     Quiet room28 (6.1)
     Support person36 (7.9)
    Support received currentlyb
     Home135 (29.5)
     Employment45 (9.8)
     Health117 (25.5)
     Finance120 (26.2)
     Social67 (14.6)
     Lifelong learning56 (12.2)
     Community86 (18.8)
     Organisation70 (15.3)
     Do not receive support205 (44.8)
    Support needed currentlyb
     Home120 (26.2)
     Employment190 (41.5)
     Health161 (35.2)
     Finance202 (44.1)
     Social247 (53.9)
     Lifelong learning222 (48.5)
     Community136 (29.7)
     Organisation140 (30.6)
     Do not want to receive support61 (13.3)
    Completion of survey
     On own371 (81.0)
     With help from somebody else77 (16.8)
     No response10 (2.2)
    • aNot included in analyses of sex comparison; data included in all other analyses. bResponders could tick more than one option, so percentages add up to more than 100%. cThe Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) scores are reported under the categories given by the SRS authors; however, the authors are aware that some autistic people may dislike this terminology and view it as pathologising. dResponders were asked to tick the relevant box if they had been diagnosed with or suspected they had an intellectual disability.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Comparison of survey responders and non-responders on age group, sex, and preferred contact method
    VariableResponder,n (%)Non-responder,n (%)χ2,(P value)Effect size,Cramer’s V
    Age, years
     18–2547 (10.3)78 (14.4)16.35 (0.001)0.128
     26–40148 (32.3)211 (38.9)
     41–60202 (44.1)214 (39.4)
     ≥6161 (13.3)a 40 (7.4)a
    Sex
     Male183 (40.0)247 (49.1)6.15 (0.046)0.081
     Female244 (53.3)246 (48.9)
     Did not report as male or femaleb 14 (3.0)10 (2.0)
    Preferred contact method
     Post111 (24.3)93 (17.3)7.35 (0.007)0.086
     Email346 (75.7)444 (82.7)
    • aIndicates significant differences, based on χ2 residuals.bNot included in analyses of sex comparison; data included in all other analyses

    • View popup
    Table 3. Proportion of responses to quantitative survey questions about important aspects of the health check from autistic adults, with sex and age effects
    Yesn (%)Non (%)Don’t known (%)No responsen (%)Sex effectsCramer’s V(P value)Age effectsCramer’s V(P value)Intellectual disability effects Crammer’s V(P value)
    Do you think that regular health checks should be provided for autistic adults?a 336 (73.4) 23 (5.0) 55 (12.0)44 (9.6) 0.06 (.557) 0.21 (0.009)*  0.13 (0.033)*
     18–25 years33 (94.3)0 (0.0)2 (5.7)   
     26–40 years104 (83.2)9 (7.2)12 (9.6)   
     41–60 years143 (78.6)6 (3.3)33 (18.1)   
     ≥61 years43 (78.2)7 (12.7)5 (9.1)   
    Would you be happy to provide information about your health needs before the health check?398 (86.9)7 (1.5)0 (0)53 (11.6)0.02 (0.689)0.04 (0.877)0.01 (0.850)
    Would you be happy to provide information about any reasonable adjustments you’d like before the health check?395 (86.2)9 (2.0)0 (0)54 (11.8)0.01 (0.796)0.12 (0.147)0.01 (0.916)
    Importance ratings for features of a health check for autistic adults: Not important n (%) Somewhat important n (%) Very important n (%) No response n (%)    
     All staff receiving training about autism2 (0.4)39 (8.5)365 (79.7)52 (11.4) 0.15 (0.011)* 0.12 (0.506)0.03 (0.819)
     Males2 (1.3)23 (14.5)134 (84.3)   
     Females0 (0.0)15 (6.8)206 (93.2)   
     Training about health checks for autistic adults9 (2.0)73 (15.9)324 (70.7)52 (11.4)0.09 (0.245)0.18 (0.050)0.06 (0.520)
     An online health check for autistic adults72 (15.7)144 (31.4)182 (39.7)60 (13.1)0.08 (0.275)0.15 (0.170)0.02 (0.908)
     A paper version of the health check59 (12.9)149 (32.5)191 (41.7)59 (12.9)0.06 (0.489)0.15 (0.200)0.08 (0.284)
     Having adequate time for discussions3 (0.7)49 (10.7)353 (77.1)53 (11.6)0.11 (0.100)0.18 (0.056)0.07 (0.341)
    • Statistically significant differences are marked in bold and with asterisk.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Proportion of responses to quantitative survey questions regarding the health check
    Yes,n (%)Sex effects,Cramer’s V (P value)Age effects,Cramer’s V (P value)Intellectual disability effects Crammer’s V (P value)
    Who should a health check be for?0.04 (0.880) 0.23 (0.030)* 0.12 (0.173)
     All autistic adults311 (67.9)
     Only autistic adults without ID9 (2.0)
     Only autistic adults with ID14 (3.1)
     Don’t know or unsure39 (8.5)
     Missing85 (18.6)
    At what age should health checks be provided?0.11 (0.683)0.27 (0.050)0.15 (0.147)
     From childhood259 (56.6)
     From teenage (≥14 years)49 (10.7)
     From early adulthood (≥18 years)55 (12.0)
     From middle age (≥40 years)12 (2.6)
     From older age (≥50 years)12 (2.6)
     All11 (2.4)
     Missing60 (13.1)
    How often should an autism-specific health check be carried out?0.12 (0.214)0.21 (0.134)0.10 (0.593)
      Annually281 (61.4)
      Every 2–3 years59 (12.9)
      Every 4–5 years16 (3.5)
      Other53 (11.6)
      Multiple selections5 (1.1)
    How long would you expect an autism-specific health check to last?0.03 (0.971)0.15 (0.518)0.06 (0.705)
     <15 minutes29 (6.3)
     15–30 minutes232 (50.7)
     31–45 minutes92 (20.1)
     >45 minutes45 (9.8)
     Missing60 (13.1)
    How would you like to be told about an autism-specific health check?0.5010.20 (0.422)0.14 (0.135)
     By letter250 (54.6)
     By text16 (3.5)
     By phone5 (1.1)
     By email103 (22.5)
     I would not want to be told in advance4 (0.9)
     Other29 (6.3)
     Missing51 (11.1)
    • ID = Intellectual disabilities. Statistically significant results are marked in bold with asterisk.

Supplementary Data

  • Mason_BJGPO.2022.0067_Supp_2.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 6, Issue 4
December 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Views about primary care health checks for autistic adults: UK survey findings
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Views about primary care health checks for autistic adults: UK survey findings
David Mason, Helen Taylor, Barry Ingham, Tracy Finch, Colin Wilson, Clare Scarlett, Anna Urbanowicz, Christina Nicolaidis, Nicholas Lennox, Sebastian Moss, Carole Buckley, Sally-Ann Cooper, Malcom Osborne, Deborah Garland, Dora Raymaker, Jeremy R Parr
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (4): BJGPO.2022.0067. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0067

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Views about primary care health checks for autistic adults: UK survey findings
David Mason, Helen Taylor, Barry Ingham, Tracy Finch, Colin Wilson, Clare Scarlett, Anna Urbanowicz, Christina Nicolaidis, Nicholas Lennox, Sebastian Moss, Carole Buckley, Sally-Ann Cooper, Malcom Osborne, Deborah Garland, Dora Raymaker, Jeremy R Parr
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (4): BJGPO.2022.0067. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0067
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • inequalities
  • health promotion and prevention
  • clinical (general)
  • autistic disorder
  • primary health care
  • general practice

More in this TOC Section

  • General practitioner roles in emergency medical services: a systematic mapping review and narrative synthesis
  • Parental experiences of eczema advice in online parenting forums: Qualitative interview study
  • Characteristics of asthma patients overprescribed short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) reliever inhalers stratified by blood eosinophil count in North East London – a cross-sectional observational study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2023 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795