Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Exploring doctors’ reasons for not granting a request for euthanasia: a mixed-methods study

Caroline van den Ende, Eveline Margaretha Bunge, Jennifer Eeuwijk and Suzanne van de Vathorst
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (4): BJGPO.2022.0015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0015
Caroline van den Ende
1 Pallas Health Research and Consultancy BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Caroline van den Ende
  • For correspondence: c.vandenende{at}amsterdamumc.nl
Eveline Margaretha Bunge
1 Pallas Health Research and Consultancy BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Eeuwijk
1 Pallas Health Research and Consultancy BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzanne van de Vathorst
3 Department of Ethics, Law and Medical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 6 no. 4 BJGPO.2022.0015
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0015
PubMed 
35803603

Published By 
Royal College of General Practitioners
History 
  • Received February 1, 2022
  • Revision received April 14, 2022
  • Accepted June 15, 2022
  • Published online December 20, 2022.

Article Versions

  • Previous version (July 8, 2022 - 03:37).
  • Previous version (October 4, 2022 - 16:30).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
Copyright © 2022, The Authors This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Author Information

  1. Caroline van den Ende1,2,*,
  2. Eveline Margaretha Bunge1,
  3. Jennifer Eeuwijk1 and
  4. Suzanne van de Vathorst3
  1. 1 Pallas Health Research and Consultancy BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2 Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3 Department of Ethics, Law and Medical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. ↵ *For correspondence:
    Caroline van den Ende, c.vandenende{at}amsterdamumc.nl
View Full Text

Article usage

Article usage: July 2022 to December 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Jul 20225123777
Aug 2022338130
Sep 2022304034
Oct 20227138264
Nov 20222017328
Dec 202272922
Jan 2023274026
Feb 2023172826
Mar 2023166533
Apr 2023173740
May 202392932
Jun 202352615
Jul 202352333
Aug 2023102519
Sep 202341815
Oct 2023114427
Nov 2023217055
Dec 2023115648
Jan 2024325553
Feb 2024103433
Mar 202465440
Apr 2024705047
May 202498638
Jun 202464336
Jul 202464841
Aug 2024136233
Sep 2024136847
Oct 2024114631
Nov 202426132
Dec 202436246
Jan 202553014
Feb 2025125116
Mar 202593710
Apr 202576451
May 2025108550
Jun 202504246
Jul 202568544
Aug 202528748
Sep 2025721459
Oct 20251318952
Nov 20251419971
Dec 20252010166

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 6, Issue 4
December 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exploring doctors’ reasons for not granting a request for euthanasia: a mixed-methods study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Exploring doctors’ reasons for not granting a request for euthanasia: a mixed-methods study
Caroline van den Ende, Eveline Margaretha Bunge, Jennifer Eeuwijk, Suzanne van de Vathorst
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (4): BJGPO.2022.0015. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Exploring doctors’ reasons for not granting a request for euthanasia: a mixed-methods study
Caroline van den Ende, Eveline Margaretha Bunge, Jennifer Eeuwijk, Suzanne van de Vathorst
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (4): BJGPO.2022.0015. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0015
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • euthanasia
  • surveys and questionnaires
  • qualitative research
  • general practitioners

More in this TOC Section

  • GPs’ perspectives regarding suicide prevention: a systematic scoping review
  • Pharmaceutical company promotional payments to English general practices: a longitudinal study
  • Cardiovascular risk management in patients using antipsychotics: a qualitative feasibility study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795