Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Diagnostic accuracy of the FRAIL scale plus functional measures for frailty screening: a cross-sectional study

Ángel Rodríguez-Laso, Iñaki Martín-Lesende, Alan Sinclair, Sandrine Sourdet, Matteo Tosato and Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (3): BJGPO.2021.0220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0220
Ángel Rodríguez-Laso
1 CIBERFES (Network-based Biomedical Research Consortium, area of Frailty and Healthy Ageing), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ángel Rodríguez-Laso
Iñaki Martín-Lesende
2 Indautxu Primary Health Centre, Bilbao-Basurto Integrated Health Organisation, Basque Health Service (Osakidetza), Bilbao, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Iñaki Martín-Lesende
Alan Sinclair
3 Foundation for Diabetes Research in Older People (fDROP), London, UK
4 Medical Sciences, Nursing and Midwifery, Kings College, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alan Sinclair
Sandrine Sourdet
5 Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sandrine Sourdet
Matteo Tosato
6 Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matteo Tosato
Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas
1 CIBERFES (Network-based Biomedical Research Consortium, area of Frailty and Healthy Ageing), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas
  • For correspondence: leocadio.rodriguez{at}salud.madrid.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson{at}gmail.com. PLEASE NOTE: your email address will be published.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Diagnostic accuracy of the FRAIL scale plus functional measures for frailty screening: a cross-sectional study
    Soledad Justo Gil
    Published on: 23 January 2024
  • Published on: (23 January 2024)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Diagnostic accuracy of the FRAIL scale plus functional measures for frailty screening: a cross-sectional study
    RE: Diagnostic accuracy of the FRAIL scale plus functional measures for frailty screening: a cross-sectional study
    • Soledad Justo Gil, Preventive Medicine and Public Health Specialist, Head of the Prevention Area. (GS Health Promotion and Prevention.GD Public Health and Health Equity. Spanish Ministry of Health)

    We consider this article of great importance and want to clarify that the "Consensus document on frailty and falls prevention among the elderly" published by the Ministry of Health of Spain and referenced in the discussion, was updated in 2022 and is now also available in English (https://www.sanidad.gob.es/areas/promocionPrevencion/envejecimientoSalud...) [external link].
    The update targets people aged 70 years and older, in the health care setting, especially in primary care.
    As a first step, an initial assessment using the Barthel Index has been proposed in order to rule out the presence of established moderate–severe dependence, because people with this condition will benefit from other specific programmes.
    This is followed by functional assessment with performance tests or the FRAIL scale and assessment of the risk of falls at the same time (the falls risk detection part is being updated). A positive result of the FRAIL scale or performance tests would indicate that the person has a high probability of being frail, in which case specific interventions are indicated within the framework of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). As a result of this, an individualised intervention will be designed with the participation...

    Show More

    We consider this article of great importance and want to clarify that the "Consensus document on frailty and falls prevention among the elderly" published by the Ministry of Health of Spain and referenced in the discussion, was updated in 2022 and is now also available in English (https://www.sanidad.gob.es/areas/promocionPrevencion/envejecimientoSalud...) [external link].
    The update targets people aged 70 years and older, in the health care setting, especially in primary care.
    As a first step, an initial assessment using the Barthel Index has been proposed in order to rule out the presence of established moderate–severe dependence, because people with this condition will benefit from other specific programmes.
    This is followed by functional assessment with performance tests or the FRAIL scale and assessment of the risk of falls at the same time (the falls risk detection part is being updated). A positive result of the FRAIL scale or performance tests would indicate that the person has a high probability of being frail, in which case specific interventions are indicated within the framework of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). As a result of this, an individualised intervention will be designed with the participation of the beneficiary, including at least an indication of multi-component physical exercise, nutritional recommendations and a review of medication.
    This stepwise screening allows for better matching of care needs and resources. It was felt that it would elicit fewer referrals for CGA and would decrease the workload of primary care teams. The inclusion in its second step of the FRAIL scale is the result of the recommendation by ADVANTAGE JA (Rodriguez-Laso A, Caballero Mora MA, Garcia Sanchez I, et al. Updated state of the art report on the prevention and management of frailty. 2019; https://www.sanidad.gob.es/areas/promocionPrevencion/envejecimientoSalud... [external link] and the great benefits it provides, such as its short administration time (it can be completed in less than two minutes) and that it can be administered in person or by telephone.
    This article confirms the appropriateness of including the cut-off point for the FRAIL scale at 1 or higher in the context of a three-step screening. We believe that this will have a positive impact on the care of older people in addressing frailty.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 6, Issue 3
September 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic accuracy of the FRAIL scale plus functional measures for frailty screening: a cross-sectional study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Diagnostic accuracy of the FRAIL scale plus functional measures for frailty screening: a cross-sectional study
Ángel Rodríguez-Laso, Iñaki Martín-Lesende, Alan Sinclair, Sandrine Sourdet, Matteo Tosato, Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (3): BJGPO.2021.0220. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0220

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnostic accuracy of the FRAIL scale plus functional measures for frailty screening: a cross-sectional study
Ángel Rodríguez-Laso, Iñaki Martín-Lesende, Alan Sinclair, Sandrine Sourdet, Matteo Tosato, Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (3): BJGPO.2021.0220. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0220
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • primary health care
  • frailty
  • frailty phenotype
  • mass screening

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and addressing UTI prevention barriers in primary care: a qualitative study
  • Depictions of the GP crisis: thematic analysis of UK newspapers pre-general election
  • Continuing professional development on planetary health for African family physicians: descriptive survey
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795