Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Undergraduate medical teaching with remote consultations in general practice: a realist evaluation

Roaa Al-bedaery, Umar Ahmed Riaz Chaudhry, Melvyn Jones, Lorraine Noble and Judith Ibison
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (3): BJGPO.2021.0185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0185
Roaa Al-bedaery
1 Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roaa Al-bedaery
  • For correspondence: rel-beda{at}sgul.ac.uk
Umar Ahmed Riaz Chaudhry
2 Population Health Research Institute (PHRI), St George’s University of London (SGUL), University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Umar Ahmed Riaz Chaudhry
Melvyn Jones
1 Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorraine Noble
3 UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lorraine Noble
Judith Ibison
1 Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Characteristics of the student research survey participants (n = 49)
    CharacteristicStudents, n (%)
    Institution  
     UCL10 (20)
     SGUL39 (80)
    Sex  
     Male20 (41)
     Female27 (55)
     Prefer not to say2 (4)
    Year of study  
     First clinical year18 (37)
     Second clinical year2 (4)
     Final year29 (59)
    • SGUL = St George's University London. UCL = University College London.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Characteristics of the tutor research survey participants (n = 19)
    CharacteristicTutors, n (%)
    Institution  
     UCL16 (84)
     SGUL3 (16)
    Sex  
     Male6 (32)
     Female13 (68)
    Years of experience as a tutor 
     ≤2 years6 (32)
     3–5 years4 (21)
     ≥6 years9 (47)
    • SGUL = St George's University London. UCL = University College London.

    • View popup
    Table 3. The context–mechanism–outcome configurations for the study
    ConfigurationContextMechanismOutcome
    Engagement  1Tutor offers opportunities for student to practise remote consultationsStudent engagement through participationReduced student apprehension with remote consultingIncreased student confidence with remote patient consultationsImproved knowledge and skills
     2Observational learning with remote consultationLimited opportunity to practise remote consultationsDisengagementDifficulty establishing tutor-student rapportDissatisfaction with learning opportunityReduced feedback from tutor to student
    Isolation  3Lack of team interactionLack of acknowledgementFeeling of student isolationLack of patient physical examinationsNegative perception of general practice
    Preparation  4Inadequate student training for examining remote patientsUncertainty with remote patient examinationsLack of confidence with examining patients remotely
     5Appropriate patient selection avoiding follow-ups, medication reviews, and patients with language barriersTeam organisationEffective teaching
    Supervision  6Tutor offers opportunities for student to practise remote consultationsThe absence of the patientStudent has more time to prepareIncreased quantity and quality of tutor feedback
     7Sequential supervision styleFinal-year medical studentsStudent engagementLess student pressure when not directly observedStudent independenceTime consuming for tutorsPromotes confidence, and patient rapport
     8Parallel supervision styleStudent anxietyDisrupted consultationReduced patient rapportTime effective for tutors
    Skills  9Lack of physical patient examinationsDifficulty establishing rapport with patientReduced skill acquisition
     10Technological setbacks with video consultingDisrupted consultationReduced use of video consultingLittle or no exposure to video consulting skills
     11Lack of non-verbal cuesLess memorable experienceReduced reflective practice

Supplementary Data

  • Albedaery_BJGPO.2021.0185_Supp.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 6, Issue 3
September 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Undergraduate medical teaching with remote consultations in general practice: a realist evaluation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Undergraduate medical teaching with remote consultations in general practice: a realist evaluation
Roaa Al-bedaery, Umar Ahmed Riaz Chaudhry, Melvyn Jones, Lorraine Noble, Judith Ibison
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (3): BJGPO.2021.0185. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0185

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Undergraduate medical teaching with remote consultations in general practice: a realist evaluation
Roaa Al-bedaery, Umar Ahmed Riaz Chaudhry, Melvyn Jones, Lorraine Noble, Judith Ibison
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (3): BJGPO.2021.0185. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0185
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • education, medical
  • General practitioners
  • remote consultation
  • general practice
  • primary health care

More in this TOC Section

  • Improving general practitioner involvement in care home End-of-Life care. A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis
  • A mixed-methods qualitative study of Northern Ireland GP specialty trainees’ clinical confidence and teaching expectations in musculoskeletal medicine
  • Accuracy and suitability of eating disorder screening tools for binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa in a primary care setting: a systematic review and narrative summary
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795