Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Practice & Policy

Considering autistic patients in the era of telemedicine: the need for an adaptable, equitable, and compassionate approach

Sebastian CK Shaw, Lucy-Jane Davis and Mary Doherty
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (1): BJGPO.2021.0174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0174
Sebastian CK Shaw
1 Department of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: s.shaw2@bsms.ac.uk
Lucy-Jane Davis
2 Leatside Surgery, Totnes, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Doherty
3 Our Lady’s Hospital, Navan, Republic of Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
  • Patient safety
  • inequalities
  • primary healthcare
  • general practice
  • telehealth
  • telemedicine

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the widespread adoption of remote consultations in general practice in the UK; using telephones, video, or e-consults accompanied by a reduction in routine face-to-face consultations. These approaches allow for continued healthcare provision while reducing the risk of transmission of communicable infections. Telephone consultations have already been a staple within general practice for many years, despite a lack of high quality evidence supporting their use.1 Reported benefits include convenience for patients and cost savings.2 However, patients tend to disclose fewer medical issues on telephone calls than in face-to-face consultations.3 Similarly, video calls rely on high quality internet and patient ability to operate the required technology.4

Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition encompassing differences in social interaction, communication, and sensory perception.5 Differences occur in the use of verbal and non-verbal communication. Challenges can include situational mutism or reliance on augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices for individuals who are non-speaking. Autism is not synonymous with learning disability. In fact, the majority of autistic adults do not have a learning disability.6 Autism diagnoses have a prevalence of at least 1%,7 but autism is likely much more prevalent due to under-recognition and under-diagnosis.7 As such, autistic individuals are a patient group all primary care professionalsare likely to encounter on a regular or semi-regular basis. Autistic adults face increased barriers to accessing health care,5 and have higher mortality rates than the general population.5 Considering the needs of autistic patients in accessing primary health care is therefore vital if we are to embody the ethical tenets of beneficence and social justice.

We write this article as neurodivergent doctors. SS is autistic and dyslexic. He is a GP speciality trainee with a parallel academic career. He has researched and published widely around the topic of neurodiversity, with particular interests in dyslexia, dyspraxia, and autism. He is currently the research lead for Autistic Doctors International. LJD is also a GP speciality trainee, with a background in academic research and public health. She is dyspraxic and has a specialist interest in supporting neurodivergent patients. MD is an autistic consultant anaesthetist and is the founder of Autistic Doctors International. Using a combination of the wider literature and our own experiences, both as clinicians and as patients, we explore the potential strengths and limitations of telemedicine in the context of autistic patients. We also propose some suggestions for increasing its accessibility.

Mode of consultation

Telemedicine may offer significant benefits for autistic people. Remote consultations can take place in a familiar environment, and avoid the social and sensory overstimulation experienced on public transport or in waiting rooms.8 Therefore the COVID-19 pandemic may have encouraged positive, inclusive change.8 A prior systematic review supported the use of telemedicine for autism diagnostics and interventions for autistic individuals.9

However, while autistic individuals have many strengths, there are also areas of life that can be more challenging. Using the telephone is difficult for many autistic adults.5,10 An inability to analyse non-verbal cues creates a degree of uncertainty and discomfort, which can result in reduced information transfer. Non-speaking autistic patients may need to rely on AAC or proxy communications via caregivers, which may be a particular challenge over the telephone. SS and MD personally find telephone calls anxiety-provoking. In contrast, LJD has found that telephone consultations can be used as part of a process of building a relationship with autistic patients, with a real benefit to discussing and signposting help, often alongside access face-to-face care.

Video calls may be equally challenging for autistic adults, as they ‘ experience more stress, have less capacity to interpret verbal and non-verbal cues, and feel less empowered to participate ’.11 This has been observed in clinical practice by LJD, and it can be exacerbated by the tendency to switch within a consultation to video where it may be unanticipated as an option by the patient.

Appointment booking

In a survey of autistic adults, 62% reported that they had difficulties booking a GP appointment by telephone, compared to only 16% of non-autistic respondents.5 This disparity creates issues with equitable access to primary healthcare from the outset. It is therefore important to consider how we book appointments for our patients and to consider non-telephone options such as online booking platforms.

Appointment timing

In the triage type (or ’doctor first’) approach, where a list of calls is generated for the doctor without specific time slots, patients are less likely to be given an appointment time, but rather a general time of day for the call (‘morning’ or ‘afternoon’). This can cause specific access issues for autistic people, where they do not have time to prepare for the call or indeed suspend what they are doing for enough time to focus exclusively on that call.

Preparation and processing

Another key aspect of remote consulting is the loss of both preparation time and the space that is normally provided by the process of attending in person. Answering a telephone call does not provide the same scaffolding. This can be exacerbated by not knowing what time to expect a call.

Communication difficulties are compounded by sensory challenges for autistic people.5 A supermarket or busy office can be a good example of a particularly challenging sensory environment, with bright lights, loud sounds, and many people nearby, yet patients may be unexpectedly called by their doctor while working or shopping.

The additional cognitive load and anxiety generated by a telephone call, particularly if unexpected, can leave an autistic adult unable to function as usual for some time. Moreover, during a consultation, some autistic patients may need extra time to process unanticipated questions due to difficulties in executive functioning.

Interoception and sensory differences

Some autistic people have a reduced sense of interoception, or the perception of physiological feedback from the body.12 This can mean that patients have a very different experience of bodily sensations. Explaining this can be complex, and some patients may not have insight into this difference. As an anecdotal example, some patients report being very unwell with conditions that would be expected to cause significant pain, but are dismissed as they do not experience, describe, or show pain in a pattern that a doctor would traditionally recognise. This will be even more challenging during a telephone discussion for both the patient and doctor where there is an absence of physical cues, and as such we would suggest a lower threshold for face-to-face consultation.

Summary and recommendations

We have a duty to make reasonable adjustments to facilitate access to healthcare for autistic patients. There is currently a paucity of research in this area. Table 1 outlines our recommendations for improving current practice based on our own experiences as neurodivergent patients and doctors. These provide a broad guide, but specific practice should be tailored to the needs of individual patients. By adopting simple recommendations and removing barriers, we can facilitate improved access and reduce morbidity and mortality for this vulnerable patient group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. Our recommendations for autistic patients

Notes

Funding

There are no funders to report for this article.

Ethical approval

N/A

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work

  • Received September 26, 2021.
  • Accepted November 9, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2022, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Downes MJ,
    2. Mervin MC,
    3. Byrnes JM,
    4. Scuffham PA
    (2017) Telephone consultations for general practice: a systematic review. Syst Rev 6(1), doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0529-0, pmid:28673333. 128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Car J,
    2. Sheikh A
    (2003) Telephone consultations. BMJ 326(7396):966–969, doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7396.966, pmid:12727771.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hewitt H,
    2. Gafaranga J,
    3. McKinstry B
    (2010) Comparison of face-to-face and telephone consultations in primary care: qualitative analysis. Br J Gen Pract 60(574):e201–e212, doi:10.3399/bjgp10X501831, pmid:20423575.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. de Souza CHA,
    2. Morbeck RA,
    3. Steinman M,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Barriers and benefits in telemedicine arising between a high-technology hospital service provider and remote public healthcare units: a qualitative study in Brazil. Telemed J E Health 23(6):527–532, doi:10.1089/tmj.2016.0158, pmid:27911667.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Doherty M,
    2. Neilson S,
    3. O'Sullivan J,
    4. et al.
    Barriers to healthcare for autistic adults: consequences & policy implications. A cross-sectional study [preprint]. medRxiv doi:10.1101/2020.04.01.20050336.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brugha TS,
    2. Spiers N,
    3. Bankart J,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Epidemiology of autism in adults across age groups and ability levels. Br J Psychiatry 209(6):498–503, doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.115.174649, pmid:27388569.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Royal College of Psychiatrists
    (2020) The psychiatric management of autism in adults (CR228). accessed. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/default-source/improving-care/better-mh-policy/college-reports/college-report-cr228.pdf?sfvrsn=c64e10e3_2. 3 Dec 2021.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Autistica
    (2020) The world after coronavirus. https://www.autistica.org.uk/news/world-after-coronavirus. 3 Dec 2021.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Knutsen J,
    2. Wolfe A,
    3. Burke BL,
    4. et al.
    (2016) A systematic review of telemedicine in autism spectrum disorders. Rev J Autism Dev Disord 3(4):330–344, doi:10.1007/s40489-016-0086-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Howard PL,
    2. Sedgewick F
    (2021) 'Anything but the phone!': communication mode preferences in the autism community. Autism 25(8):2265–2278, doi:10.1177/13623613211014995, pmid:34169750.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zolyomi A,
    2. Begel A,
    3. Waldern JF,
    4. et al.
    (2019) Managing stress: the needs of autistic adults in video calling. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact 3 1–29, doi:10.1145/3359236.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Trevisan DA,
    2. Parker T,
    3. McPartland JC
    (2021) First-hand accounts of interoceptive difficulties in autistic adults. J Autism Dev Disord 51(10):3483–3491, doi:10.1007/s10803-020-04811-x, pmid:33389300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 6, Issue 1
March 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Considering autistic patients in the era of telemedicine: the need for an adaptable, equitable, and compassionate approach
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Considering autistic patients in the era of telemedicine: the need for an adaptable, equitable, and compassionate approach
Sebastian CK Shaw, Lucy-Jane Davis, Mary Doherty
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (1): BJGPO.2021.0174. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0174

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Considering autistic patients in the era of telemedicine: the need for an adaptable, equitable, and compassionate approach
Sebastian CK Shaw, Lucy-Jane Davis, Mary Doherty
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (1): BJGPO.2021.0174. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0174
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Summary and recommendations
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Patient safety
  • Inequalities
  • primary healthcare
  • general practice
  • telehealth
  • telemedicine

More in this TOC Section

  • The BJGP Open Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of 2024: an editorial
  • The overlooked challenges facing out-of-hours primary care in the NHS: a missed opportunity in policy
  • Potentially inappropriate prescribing in middle-aged adults: a significant problem with a lack of action and evidence to address it
Show more Practice & Policy

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795