Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • CONFERENCE
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
BJGP Open
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • CONFERENCE
Research

Medication prescribing in face-to-face versus telehealth consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practice: a retrospective observational study

Nasir Wabe, Judith Thomas, Gorkem Sezgin, Muhammad Kashif Sheikh, Emma Gault and Andrew Georgiou
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (1): BJGPO.2021.0132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0132
Nasir Wabe
1 Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nasir.wabe@mq.edu.au
Judith Thomas
1 Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Judith Thomas
Gorkem Sezgin
1 Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
2 Electronic Medical Record Subject Matter Expert, ICT West Gippsland Healthcare Group, Warragul, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muhammad Kashif Sheikh
2 Electronic Medical Record Subject Matter Expert, ICT West Gippsland Healthcare Group, Warragul, Australia
3 Digital Health and ICT, Gippsland Primary Health Network, Traralgon, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Gault
4 Gippsland Primary Health Network, Bairnsdale, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Georgiou
1 Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Participant selection flow chart, April–December 2020. aIndicates prescriptions not associated (linked) with the selected Medicare Benefit Scheme items for standard, chronic disease management, and mental health-related consultations. MH = mental health.
  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. Risk-adjusted rate of prescribing at least one medication by month of GP consultation, April–December 2020. Risk-adjustment included patient level variables (age, sex, socioeconomic status, patient status, and the remoteness index)

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Baseline characteristics of consultations, April–December 2020
    Variables, n (%)Face to face( n = 8 303 233)Telehealth( n = 5 304 983)Overall (n = 13 608 216)
    Sex, Female4 684 918 (56.4)3 324 348 (62.7)8 009 266 (58.9)
    Age group , years
     <403 342 444 (40.3)2 086 727 (39.3)5 429 171 (39.9)
     40–592 063 824 (24.9)1 420 669 (26.8)3 484 493 (25.6)
     60–741 714 115 (20.6)1 030 080 (19.4)2 744 195 (20.2)
     ≥751 182 850 (14.2)767 507 (14.5)1 950 357 (14.3)
    Socioeconomic status/IRSAD a
     1 (most disadvantaged)932 407 (11.3)429 285 (8.1)1 361 692 (10.0)
     21 089 856 (13.2)559 819 (10.6)1 649 675 (12.2)
     31 101 025 (13.3)795 165 (15.0)1 896 190 (14.0)
     41 933 384 (23.3)1 292 530 (24.4)3 225 914 (23.8)
     5 (most advantaged)3 227 349 (39.0)2 216 393 (41.7)5 443 742 (40.1)
    Remoteness a
     Major cities7 417 738 (89.5)4 695 032 (88.7)12 112 770 (89.2)
     Inner regional793 798 (9.6)560 362 (10.6)1 354 160 (10.0)
     Outer regional or remote or very remote73 194 (0.9)38 290 (0.7)111 484 (0.8)
    Patient status
     Active7 646 925 (92.1)5 116 207 (96.4)12 763 132 (93.8)
     Non-active656 308 (7.9)188 776 (3.6)845 084 (6.2)
    State
     Victoria4 470 203 (53.8)3 764 927 (71.0)8 235 130 (60.5)
     NSW3 833 030 (46.2)1 540 056 (29.0)5 373 086 (39.5)
    • a≈0.2% missing data. IRSAD = Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage. NSW = New South Wales.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Difference in medication prescribing between face-to-face and telehealth consultations, April–December 2020
    Consultation typeNumber of consultations with at least one medication prescribed, n (%)Total consultations, n Face to face versus telehealth
    Difference, %OR (95% CI)a
    VictoriaFace to face1 807 097 (40.4)4 470 2035.41.28 (1.270 to 1.281)
    Telehealth1 319 473 (35.0)3 764 927
    NSWFace to face1 457 651 (38.0)3 833 0309.91.62 (1.619 to 1.630)
    Telehealth432 405 (28.1)1 540 056
    OverallFace to face3 264 748 (39.3)8 303 2336.31.38 (1.379 to 1.381)
    Telehealth1 751 878 (33.0)5 304 983
    • aAdjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, patient status, remoteness, primary health network, and the state of the practice. NSW = New South Wales.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Difference in first-time medication prescribing between face-to-face and telehealth consultations, April–December 2020
    Consultation typeNumber of consultations with a first-time prescription, n (%)Total consultations, n Face to face versus telehealth
    Difference, %OR (95% CI)a
    VictoriaFace to face830 677 (18.6)4 470 2037.91.93 (1.929 to 1.940)
    Telehealth401 378 (10.7)3 764 927
    NSWFace to face689 724 (18.0)3 833 0309.22.33 (2.320 to 2.350)
    Telehealth135 766 (8.8)1 540 056
    OverallFace to face1 520 401 (18.3)8 303 2338.22.03 (2.020 to 2.031)
    Telehealth537 144 (10.1)5 304 983
    • aAdjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, patient status, remoteness, PHN, and the state of the practice. NSW = New South Wales.

Supplementary Data

  • BJGPO.2021.0132_Supp.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 6, Issue 1
March 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Medication prescribing in face-to-face versus telehealth consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practice: a retrospective observational study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Medication prescribing in face-to-face versus telehealth consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practice: a retrospective observational study
Nasir Wabe, Judith Thomas, Gorkem Sezgin, Muhammad Kashif Sheikh, Emma Gault, Andrew Georgiou
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (1): BJGPO.2021.0132. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0132

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Medication prescribing in face-to-face versus telehealth consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practice: a retrospective observational study
Nasir Wabe, Judith Thomas, Gorkem Sezgin, Muhammad Kashif Sheikh, Emma Gault, Andrew Georgiou
BJGP Open 2022; 6 (1): BJGPO.2021.0132. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0132
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • general practice
  • COVID-19
  • telemedicine

More in this TOC Section

  • Translating primary care to telehealth: analysis of in-person consultations on diabetes and cardiovascular disease
  • Primary care physicians’ perceptions of social determinants of health recommendations: a qualitative study
  • Ethnic minority GP trainees at risk for underperformance assessments: a quantitative cohort study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2023 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795