Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Diagnostic accuracy of Fever-PAIN and Centor criteria for bacterial throat infection in adults with sore throat: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Anna Seeley, Thomas Fanshawe, Merryn Voysey, Alastair Hay, Michael Moore and Gail Hayward
BJGP Open 2021; 5 (6): BJGPO.2021.0122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0122
Anna Seeley
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
BA, MBChB
Roles: Dr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anna Seeley
  • For correspondence: anna.seeley{at}worc.ox.ac.uk
Thomas Fanshawe
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
PhD
Roles: Dr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Merryn Voysey
2 Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
PhD
Roles: Dr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alastair Hay
3 Centre of Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
PhD
Roles: Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Moore
4 Primary Care and Population Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, UK
MSc
Roles: Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gail Hayward
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
PhD
Roles: Associate Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Proportion with throat swabs positive for streptococcal † infection. Proportion of those with streptococcal infection within each clinical prediction score, with 95% confidence intervals represented by black bars. Lines on the graph added for thresholds of Centor criteria ≥3 and FeverPAIN ≥4 indicating high probability of infection, where NICE supports consideration of antibiotic prescription. Data below the graph indicate the number of participants at each score, and number who were throat-swab positive for group A, C, or G streptococci. All beta-Lancefield group streptococci to include group A, C, and G streptococci strains isolated on agar plates after 48 hours culture.
  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for diagnostic accuracy in identifying streptococcal infections for FeverPAIN and Centor clinical prediction rules. All beta-Lancefield group streptococci to include group A, C, and G streptococci strains isolated on agar plates after 48 hours culture. ROC curve analysis showing sensitivity versus 1-specificity each threshold. The different scores are shown next to a point on the graph. Each colour represents the diagnostic accuracy of one clinical prediction rule for streptococcal infection in adults with sore throat.
  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3. Implications of diagnostic accuracy of FeverPAIN and Centor CPR in diagnosing streptococcal throat infections in 100 adults presenting with sore throat not deemed to require immediate antibiotics. The diagram illustrates how both CPR scores would operate if used on 100 people presenting with sore throat, based on a similar prevalence (16%) of streptococcal infection, as found in the present study. Different colours indicate possible outcomes: true positive (blue), false positive (yellow), false negative (red), and true negative (grey).
  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4. Delayed antibiotics prescribed in TOAST according to each clinical preduction rule score. The graph displays the percentage of participants in each clinical decision score who were prescribed delayed antibiotics at presentation. The numbers within each bar indicate the number of participants who received a delayed prescription at each score.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Throat swab culture results
    All beta-Lancefield group streptococciaGroup A streptococciGroup C and G streptococci
    Negative swabPositive swabPNegative swabPositive swabPNegative swabPositive swabP
    n, %(n = 421)n, %(n = 81)n, %(n = 439)n, %(n = 63)n, %(n = 484)n, %(n = 18)
    Centor ≥3(n = 74)55 (13%)19 (24%)0.0159 (13%)15 (24%)0.0377 (16%)4 (22%)0.33
    FeverPAIN 2–3(n = 266)192 (46%)48 (60%)0.02205 (47%)35 (56%)0.16253 (52%)13 (72%)0.03
    FeverPAIN ≥4(n = 11)8 (2%)3 (3.7%)0.159 (2%)2 (3%)0.4210 (2%)1 (6%)0.09
    • ↵a All beta-Lancefield group streptococci to include group A, C, and G streptococci strains isolated on agar plates after 48 hours culture.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Diagnostic accuracy at each threshold of clinical prediction rule
    Threshold n above / belowSensitivity(95% CI)Specificity(95% CI)ROC(95% CI)PPV(95% CI)NPV(95% CI)
    Centor ≥1424/7890.1 (81.5 to 95)16.6 (13.2 to 20.5)0.53 (0.5 to 0.57)17.2 (13.7 to 21.2)89.7 (80.8 to 95.5)
    Centor ≥2211/29861.7 (50.3 to 72.3)61.8 (56.9 to 66.4)0.62 (0.6 to 0.68)23.7 (18.1 to 30)89.3 (85.2 to 92.6)
    Centor ≥374/42823.5 (14.8 to 34.2)86.9 (83.3 to 90)0.55 (0.50 to 0.60)25.7 (16.2 to 37.2)85.5 (81.8 to 88.7)
    Centor ≥412/4903.7 (0.77 to 10.4)97.9 (96 to 99)0.51 (0.49 to 0.53)25 (5.49 to 57.2)84.1 (80.5 to 87.2)
    FeverPAIN ≥1434/6893.8 (86.2 to 98)15 (11.7 to 18.7)0.54 (0.51 to 0.58)17.5 (14.1 to 21.4)92.6 (83.7 to 97.6)
    FeverPAIN ≥2251/25163 (51.5 to 73.4)52.5 (47.6 to 57.4)0.58 (0.52 to 0.64)20.3 (15.5 to 25.8)88 (83.4 to 91.8)
    FeverPAIN ≥393/40922.2 (13.7 to 32.8)82.2 (78.2 to 85.7)0.52 (0.48 to 0.57)19.4 (11.9 to 28.9)84.6 (80.7 to 88)
    FeverPAIN ≥411/4913.7 (0.77 to 10.4)98.1 (96.3 to 99.2)0.51 (0.49 to 0.53)27.3 (6.02 to 61)84.1 (80.6 to 87.2)
    FeverPAIN ≥52/5001.29 (0.031 to 6.69)99.8 (98.7 to 100)0.51 (0.49 to 0.52)50 (1.26 to 98.7)84 (80.5 to 87.1)
    • ROC = area under receiver operating characteristics curve. PPV = positive predictive value. NPV = negative predictive value

Supplementary Data

  • BJGPO.2021.0122_Supp.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 5, Issue 6
January 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic accuracy of Fever-PAIN and Centor criteria for bacterial throat infection in adults with sore throat: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Diagnostic accuracy of Fever-PAIN and Centor criteria for bacterial throat infection in adults with sore throat: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial
Anna Seeley, Thomas Fanshawe, Merryn Voysey, Alastair Hay, Michael Moore, Gail Hayward
BJGP Open 2021; 5 (6): BJGPO.2021.0122. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0122

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnostic accuracy of Fever-PAIN and Centor criteria for bacterial throat infection in adults with sore throat: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial
Anna Seeley, Thomas Fanshawe, Merryn Voysey, Alastair Hay, Michael Moore, Gail Hayward
BJGP Open 2021; 5 (6): BJGPO.2021.0122. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0122
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • diagnosis
  • minor illness
  • Respiratory illness
  • pharyngitis
  • decision making
  • general practice
  • primary healthcare

More in this TOC Section

  • Depictions of the GP crisis: thematic analysis of UK newspapers pre-general election
  • Continuing professional development on planetary health for African family physicians: descriptive survey
  • What does "housebound" mean? Mixed methods study to develop a consensus definition
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795