Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Integrated cardiovascular risk management programme versus usual care in patients at high cardiovascular risk: an observational study in general practice

Suzanne Marchal, Arnoud WJ van 't Hof, Henk JG Bilo, Sander J Deijns, Jan Evert Heeg, Marieke Schoenmakers, Michiel Schouwink, Olof Schwantje, Michiel L Bots, Arno W Hoes and Monika Hollander
BJGP Open 2021; 5 (2): BJGPO.2020.0099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0099
Suzanne Marchal
1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Suzanne Marchal
  • For correspondence: s.marchal{at}umcutrecht.nl
Arnoud WJ van 't Hof
2 Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
3 Department of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
4 Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henk JG Bilo
4 Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
5 Center for Integrated Care, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sander J Deijns
1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Evert Heeg
4 Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marieke Schoenmakers
6 Care Group Medrie, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michiel Schouwink
6 Care Group Medrie, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olof Schwantje
7 General Practice Assendorp, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michiel L Bots
1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arno W Hoes
1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monika Hollander
1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. ZWOT-CASE study flow diagram. CVD = cardiovascular disease. CVR = cardiovascular risk. CVRM = cardiovascular risk management. *As the response rate in the intervention group was lower than the expected 70%, the required sample size was not reached after 587 intervention patients were invited. Therefore, 226 extra patients were invited to the intervention group (total invited n = 813) and they were matched retrospectively to the usual care group.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Baseline characteristics
     CharacteristicsIntervention group(n = 372)Usual care group(n = 317)
     Mean age, years (SD)65.1 (8.3)66.2 (7.5)
     Age <65 years175 (47)132 (42)
     Female158 (42)132 (42)
     Western358 (96)295 (93)
    Cardiovascular risk factors
     Hypertensiona 280 (75)234 (74)
     Hypercholesterolemiaa 91 (24)91 (29)
     Current smokerb 43 (12)32 (10)
     Chronic kidney diseasec 40 (11)51 (16)
     Microalbuminuriac 15 (4)10 (3)
     Rheumatoid arthritisa 4 (1)10 (3)
    Cardiovascular diseasesa,d 172 (46)162 (51)
     Myocardial infarction41 (11)48 (15)
     Coronary sclerosis46 (12)44 (14)
     Angina pectoris44 (12)39 (12)
     Transient ischaemic attack33 (9)31 (10)
     Cerebral infarction35 (9)17 (5)
     Aneurysm aortae8 (2)11 (3)
     Intermittent claudication12 (3)13 (4)
     Atherosclerosis4 (1)4 (1)
    Comorbidities (including other CVD)a
     COPD9 (2)14 (4)
     Atrial fibrillation23 (6)16 (5)
     Heart failure1 (0.3)3 (1)
    Medication use b
     Antihypertensive agents299 (80)251 (79)
     Statins/lipid-lowering agents190 (51)167 (53)
     Anticoagulants169 (45)154 (49)
    Measurementse
     Mean SBP, mmHg (SD)136.7 (15.2) —
     Mean DBP, mmHg (SD)80.3 (9.5) —
     Mean LDL-cholesterol, mmol/l (SD)2.8 (0.9) —
     Mean BMI (SD)27.7 (4.0) —
    • aBased on International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC)-coded diagnoses. bBased on medical records. cBased on ICPC-coded diagnoses and/or laboratory measurements. Microalbuminuria: albumin-creatinine ratio >3 mg/mmol. Chronic kidney disease: ≥3 months impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/minute/1.73 m2) and/or microalbuminuria.dCardiovascular diseases as inclusion criteria for integrated CVRM care and for the study. eBaseline measurements of the control group at t = 0 are not presented, as there was no routine intake consultation.

    • BMI = body mass index. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CVD = cardiovascular diseases. DBP = diastolic blood pressure. LDL = low-density lipoprotein. SBP = systolic blood pressure. SD = standard deviation.

    • Absolute numbers (%) are presented unless stated otherwise.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Primary and secondary outcomes, descriptives
     OutcomesIntervention group( n = 372)Usual care group( n = 317)
    Primary outcomes N N
     Mean systolic blood pressure, mmHg (SD)358a 137.2 (16.2)298b 139.0 (16.8)
     Mean LDL-cholesterol, mmol/l (SD)347c 2.6 (0.8)310d 2.6 (1.0)
    Secondary outcomes
     Mean diastolic blood pressure, mmHg (SD)35880.3 (10.2)29880.6 (10.1)
     Blood pressure <140/90 mmHg358214 (60)298175 (59)
     LDL-cholesterol <2.5 mmol/l347178 (51)310168 (54)
     LDL-cholesterol <1.8 mmol/le 16645 (27)16358 (36)
     Smoking36331 (9)31130 (10)
     Mean BMI (SD)34927.3 (5.2)30027.7 (4.8)
    10 -year CVD morbidity or mortality riskf
     All patients, median (IQR)31722.0 (11.7–36.4)26724.0 (13.7–38.0)
     Patients with CVD, median (IQR)15926.2 (17.9–38.5)14427.8 (18.7–39.5)
     Patients without CVD, median (IQR)15815.5 (5.4–31.9)12318.7 (8.4–34.3)
    Healthy food habits
     Vegetables >150–200 grams a day360142 (39)29499 (34)
     Fruits >200 grams a day354214 (60)294187 (64)
     Red meat <300 grams a week356207 (58)286155 (54)
     Fatty fish >1 a week358244 (68)296187 (63)
     Unhealthy fat products <3 a week & healthy fat products >3 a week352121 (34)28975 (26)
     Sweet & salty snacks <3 a week357196 (55)295157 (53)
     Table salt <3 a week360335 (93)294265 (90)
     Alcohol consumption, units a week, median (IQR)3113 (0–7)2922 (0–7)
     Physically activeg 303230 (76)250178 (71)
    Medication use
    Patients with CVD
     Antihypertensive drugs174137 (79)160121 (76)
     Lipid-lowering drugs174139 (80)160127 (79)
     Anticoagulants174160 (92)160146 (91)
    Patients without CVD
     Antihypertensive drugs187167 (89)149126 (85)
     Lipid-lowering drugs18852 (28)14946 (31)
     GP as primary treating practitionerh 368366 (99)314307 (98)
     Consultations in general practice, median (IQR)i 3616 (3–10)3116 (3–10)
     Patient satisfaction (PREM) (1–5j), mean (SD)3593.6 (0.7)2833.5 (0.8)
     Recommendation score (0–10j), mean (SD)3528.3 (1.3)2758.2 (1.3)
     EQ-5D-5L index score (–0.45–1j), mean (SD)3530.9 (0.1)2900.8 (0.1)
     SF-12 Mental component (7.9–72.0j), mean (SD)35353.9 (7.5)29052.3 (9.3)
     SF-12 Physical component (5.2–64.7j), mean (SD)35348.1 (9.2)29046.7 (10.0)
     HADS Anxiety (0–7j), mean (SD)3424.1 (3.3)2864.5 (3.7)
     HADS Depression (0–7j), mean (SD)3473.2 (3.0)2833.9 (3.3)
     Newly developed CVDk 36410 (3)31110 (3)
     Newly developed comorbidityl 36313 (4)31112 (4)
     Mortality3725 (1)3183 (1)
    • aReasons for missing data: died before endpoint (n = 5), not measured (n = 7), data not available owing to change of GP (n = 2). bReasons for missing data: died before endpoint (n = 3), not measured (n = 16). cReasons for missing data: died before endpoint (n = 5), not measured (n = 16), data not available owing to change of GP (n = 4). dReasons for missing data: died before endpoint (n = 3), not measured (n = 3), data not available owing to change of GP (n = 1). eFor patients with CVD, n = 175 in intervention group and n = 164 in usual care group. fFor patient with known CVD the SMART-function was used to calculate the risk; for patients without CVD the risk was based on the risk chart in the Dutch guideline for CVRM (based on the SCORE risk function).15 g >5 days a week moderate intense physical activity >30 minutes a day. hPrimary treating practitioner could be the GP or a medical specialist. iIncluding all visits and telephone calls with the general practice for all reasons. jMinimum and maximum possible values. kIncluding cardiovascular diseases as inclusion criteria for integrated CVRM care and for the study. lIncluding diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and chronic renal impairment.

    • BMI = body mass index. CVD = cardiovascular diseases. EQ-5D-5L = five-level EuroQoL-5 Dimensions. HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. IQR = interquartile range. LDL = low-density lipoprotein. PREM = Patient Reported Experience Measure. SD = standard deviation. SF-12 = Short Form–12 Health Survey.

    • Absolute numbers (%) are presented unless stated otherwise.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Effect of integrated CVRM care on the primary and secondary outcomes compared with usual care, using generalised mixed-model analyses
     Crude modela Adjusted modelb
    Outcomes n Betac 95% CI P value n Betac 95% CI P value
    Primary outcomes
     Systolic blood pressure656–1.75–5.78 to 2.290.38647–1.78–6.09 to 2.530.40
     LDL-cholesterol6570.05–0.13 to 0.230.586530.01–0.15 to 0.180.86
    Secondary outcomes, continuous
     Diastolic blood pressure6560.04–3.05 to 3.130.97647–0.37–3.78 to 3.040.82
     BMI649–0.27–1.28 to 0.740.596410.09–0.83 to 1.020.84
     EQ-5D-5L index score6430.01–0.02 to 0.040.466330.01–0.02 to 0.030.64
     SF-12 Mental component6431.610.21 to 3.020.03d 6331.39–0.17 to 2.950.08
     SF-12 Physical component6431.45–0.38 to 3.280.126331.01–0.74 to 2.760.25
     Patient satisfaction (PREM)6420.13–0.03 to 0.290.116310.14–0.03 to 0.320.10
     Recommendation score6270.13–0.10 to 0.360.246160.11–0.13 to 0.360.35
     HADS Anxiety628–0.39–1.05 to 0.270.23618–0.35–1.06 to 0.370.32
     HADS Depression630–0.61–1.27 to 0.060.07620–0.45–1.19 to 4.410.22
      n Ratio e 95% CI P value n Ratio e 95% CI P value
    Secondary outcomes, log transformed
     10-year CV risk
     All patients5840.870.75 to 1.020.085830.900.76 to 1.060.21
     Patients with CVD3030.980.86 to 1.120.763031.040.90 to 1.200.59
     Patients without CVD2810.810.62 to 1.060.112800.800.60 to 1.080.15
    Secondary outcomes, dichotomous
     Blood pressure <140/90 mmHg6560.960.54 to 1.830.996470.970.52 to 1.830.93
     LDL-cholesterol <2.5 mmol/l6570.890.64 to 1.230.486531.130.74 to 1.720.57
     LDL-cholesterol <1.8 mmol/l3290.640.37 to 1.130.123260.700.39 to 1.260.24
     Smoking6740.870.52 to 1.480.626711.000.54 to 1.850.99
    Healthy food habitsf
     Vegetables6541.280.93 to 1.770.136431.260.87 to 1.830.21
     Fruits6480.880.64 to 1.200.416370.940.65 to 1.350.72
     Red meat6421.170.86 to 1.610.326321.210.85 to 1.740.29
     Fatty fish6541.300.89 to 1.910.186431.240.83 to 1.850.30
     Fatty products6411.491.06 to 2.110.02d 6311.410.95 to 2.080.09
     Snacks6521.070.79 to 1.460.676411.220.85 to 1.730.28
     Table salt6541.470.84 to 2.580.186431.680.84 to 3.350.14
     Physical activity5531.290.83 to 1.990.255431.310.84 to 2.060.24
    Medication use
    Patients with CVD
     Antihypertensive drugs3341.190.72 to 1.990.503345.090.56 to 46.00.15
     Lipid-lowering drugs3341.030.61 to 1.760.913340.970.26 to 3.570.96
     Anticoagulants3341.100.51 to 2.380.823341.520.23 to 9.900.66
    Patients without CVD
     Antihypertensive drugs3361.520.80 to 2.900.203361.230.12 to 12.20.86
     Lipid-lowering drugs3370.860.53 to 1.370.523370.710.18 to 2.790.62
     GP as primary treating practitioner6823.930.74 to 21.00.1167110.500.80 to 138.30.07
     Newly developed CVD6750.850.35 to 2.070.726710.990.37 to 2.640.99
     Newly developed comorbidity6740.910.34 to 2.410.856711.110.43 to 2.910.83
     Mortality6891.480.32 to 6.890.626720.370.00 to 38.80.68
    Secondary outcomes, count
     Alcohol consumption6010.880.65 to 1.190.395940.810.60 to 1.090.17
     Consultations in general practice6721.050.89 to 1.250.546701.040.89 to 1.210.65
    • aCorrected for clustering within practices. bCorrected for clustering within practices and predefined confounders. cDifference between intervention and usual care group. dStatistically significant. eRatio, should be interpreted as a multiplication factor. For example, a ratio of 1.05 should be interpreted as a 5% higher outcome score in the intervention group compared with the usual care group. fHealthy food habits: vegetables >150–200 grams a day; fruits >200 grams a day; red meat <300 grams a week; fatty fish >1 a week; unhealthy fatty products <3 a week and healthy fatty products >3 a week; sweet and salty snacks <3 a week; table salt <3 a week.

    • BMI = body mass index. CV = cardiovascular. CVD = cardiovascular disease. EQ-5D = five-level EuroQoL-5 Dimensions. HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. LDL = low-density lipoprotein. PREM = Patient Reported Experience Measure. SF-12 = Short Form–12 Health Survey.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 5, Issue 2
April 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Integrated cardiovascular risk management programme versus usual care in patients at high cardiovascular risk: an observational study in general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Integrated cardiovascular risk management programme versus usual care in patients at high cardiovascular risk: an observational study in general practice
Suzanne Marchal, Arnoud WJ van 't Hof, Henk JG Bilo, Sander J Deijns, Jan Evert Heeg, Marieke Schoenmakers, Michiel Schouwink, Olof Schwantje, Michiel L Bots, Arno W Hoes, Monika Hollander
BJGP Open 2021; 5 (2): BJGPO.2020.0099. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0099

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Integrated cardiovascular risk management programme versus usual care in patients at high cardiovascular risk: an observational study in general practice
Suzanne Marchal, Arnoud WJ van 't Hof, Henk JG Bilo, Sander J Deijns, Jan Evert Heeg, Marieke Schoenmakers, Michiel Schouwink, Olof Schwantje, Michiel L Bots, Arno W Hoes, Monika Hollander
BJGP Open 2021; 5 (2): BJGPO.2020.0099. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0099
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cardiovascular diseases
  • Prevention
  • general practice
  • delivery of health care, integrated

More in this TOC Section

  • Patients’ experiences of phosphatidylethanol in hypertension treatment in primary care: qualitative study
  • Implementing a medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people living with frailty and polypharmacy in general practice: a feasibility study
  • A systematic review of the perspectives of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes on behavioural weight management
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795