Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open accessibility statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial fellowships
    • Audio abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • Feedback
    • BJGP Life
    • Advertising
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Conference
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open accessibility statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial fellowships
    • Audio abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • Feedback
    • BJGP Life
    • Advertising
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Conference
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
Research

Guidance for post-discharge care following acute kidney injury: an appropriateness ratings evaluation

Jung Yin Tsang, Jonathan Murray, Edward Kingdon, Charlie Tomson, Kyle Hallas, Stephen Campbell and Tom Blakeman
BJGP Open 2020; 4 (3): bjgpopen20X101054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101054
Jung Yin Tsang
1 National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Greater Manchester, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
2 NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PTSRC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jung Yin Tsang
  • For correspondence: jungyin.tsang@manchester.ac.uk
Jonathan Murray
3 Renal Unit, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
4 Academic Health Science Network for the North East and North Cumbria (AHSN NENC), Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Kingdon
5 Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
6 Kent Surrey Sussex Academic Health Science Network (KSS AHSN), Crawley, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlie Tomson
7 Department of Renal Medicine, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle Hallas
1 National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Greater Manchester, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Campbell
2 NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PTSRC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Blakeman
1 National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Greater Manchester, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
2 NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PTSRC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
8 RCGP Clinical Champion for Kidney Care, Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Guidance on the timeliness of post-discharge care for adults following acute kidney injury (AKI).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Key characteristics of categorisations of the clinical scenarios tested
    AKI severityKidney recoveryClinical historyManagement: next steps for rating
    • AKI stage 1

    • AKI stage 2

    • AKI stage 3

    • Good (serum creatinine within ≤25% above baseline)

    • Moderate (serum creatinine >25% and <50% above baseline)

    • Poor (serum creatinine ≥50% above baseline)

    • Chronic kidney disease

    • Chronic heart failure

    • Chronic heart failure with chronic kidney disease

    • Other significant cardiovascular risk factors

    • Markers of vulnerability

    • Markers of frailty

    • Determine appropriateness and timeliness in medication review

    • Determine appropriateness and timeliness in kidney monitoring for serum creatinine

    • Determine appropriateness and timeliness in kidney monitoring for proteinuria (urinary ACR)

    • ACR = albumin-to-creatinine ratio. AKI = acute kidney injury.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Summary of round-two appropriateness ratings with definitions of consensus, N = 819.
    Appropriateness ratings n (%)
    Agreement (8/10 [80%] of panel members rating in the same three-point region)465 (56.8%)
    • Appropriate (80% of panel members rating 7–9)

    214 (26.1%)
    • Inappropriate (80% of panel members rating 1–3)

    251 (30.6%)
    Agreement with uncertain benefit (80% of panel members rating the same consecutive three-point region, but not 1–3 or 7–9)59 (7.2%)
    Disagreement (≥30% of scores in 1–3 and ≥30% in 7–9 for same scenario)24 (2.9%)
    Equivocal (ratings of clinical scenarios without consensus; that is, neither ‘agreement’ nor ‘disagreement’)271 (33.1%)
    • View popup
    Table 3. Summary of timeliness for performing the first post-discharge medication review.
    Medication review ratingsAKI Warning Stage 1AKI Warning Stage 2AKI Warning Stage 3
    Kidney recovery (SCr % above baseline)≤ 25%>25% & <50%≥ 50%≤ 25%>25% & <50%≥ 50%≤ 25%>25% & <50%≥ 50%
    Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)
    No past medical historyNot required1.5 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    Med r/v at 3 days1.5 (I)2 (I)3.5 (E)2 (I)3 (E)4.5 (E)3 (I)3.5 (E)6.5 (D)
    Med r/v at 1–2 weeks2.5 (I)4 (E)7 (E)6 (D)7.5 (U)8 (A)7.5 (E)8 (E)8 (E)
    Med r/v at 1 month6.5 (E)7 (U)6.5 (U)7 (E)7 (U)6.5 (E)7 (U)6.5 (U)5.5 (E)
    Med r/v at 3 months7 (E)6 (E)5.5 (E)6.5 (E)4.5 (E)3.5 (E)5 (E)4 (E)2.5 (E)
    Chronic kidney diseaseNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    Med r/v at 3 days3 (I)4 (E)5.5 (E)3 (E)4 (E)6.5 (E)3 (E)4 (E)4 (E)
    Med r/v at 1–2 weeks5.5 (E)8 (E)8 (A)7 (E)8 (A)8 (A)7.5 (E)8.5 (A)8.5 (A)
    Med r/v at 1 month8 (A)8 (A)6.5 (E)8 (A)7 (A)*5 (E)7 (A)7 (A)*7 (A)*
    Med r/v at 3 months5.5 (U)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)5 (E)3 (E)2 (E)4.5 (E)3 (E)3 (E)
    Chronic heart failureNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    Med r/v at 3 days4.5 (U)5 (U)7 (U)4 (E)5.5 (U)8 (A)*5 (E)6 (E)9 (A)
    Med r/v at 1–2 weeks8 (A)8.5 (A)9 (A)8 (A)8 (A)9 (A)9 (A)8.5 (A)8 (A)*
    Med r/v at 1 month7 (U)6 (E)5.5 (E)6 (U)6 (E)5 (E)5.5 (U)5 (E)3.5 (E)
    Med r/v at 3 months4 (E)3 (E)2.5 (I)4 (E)2.5 (E)2 (I)4 (E)2 (I)1.5 (I)
    Chronic kidney disease & chronic heart failureNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    Med r/v at 3 days4.5 (E)6 (U)8 (A)*5.5 (E)6 (U)8 (A)*6 (E)8 (A)*9 (A)
    Med r/v at 1–2 weeks8 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)8 (A)*
    Med r/v at 1 month6 (E)6.5 (E)4.5 (D)6 (E)4.5 (E)3.5 (D)5.5 (E)4 (E)2.5 (E)
    Med r/v at 3 months3 (E)2.5 (E)2 (I)3 (E)2 (I)1.5 (I)2.5 (E)1.5 (I)1 (I)
    Other significant cardiovascular risk factorsNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    Med r/v at 3 days2.5 (I)3.5 (U)5 (E)3 (U)4 (E)6.5 (E)4 (U)4.5 (E)7 (A)*
    Med r/v at 1–2 weeks6 (U)7.5 (A)*8 (A)7 (E)8 (A)9 (A)8 (E)9 (A)9 (A)
    Med r/v at 1 month8 (A)8 (A)6.5 (E)8 (A)7.5 (A)*6 (E)8 (A)7.5 (A)*5.5 (D)
    Med r/v at 3 months6 (U)5 (E)3 (I)4.5 (U)3 (I)2 (I)5 (E)2.5 (I)1.5 (I)
    Markers of vulnerabilityNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    Med r/v at 3 days3 (U)4 (U)6 (E)3 (U)4.5 (U)6 (U)4 (E)5.5 (U)8 (A)*
    Med r/v at 1–2 weeks6.5 (E)8 (A)8.5 (A)7 (E)8 (A)9 (A)8 (A)*9 (A)8 (A)
    Med r/v at 1 month8 (A)7 (A)*7 (E)8 (A)7.5 (A)*6.5 (E)8 (A)7.5 (E)6 (D)
    Med r/v at 3 months5 (E)4 (E)3.5 (E)4.5 (E)3.5 (E)3 (I)4 (E)3 (I)1.5 (I)
    Other markers of frailtyNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    Med r/v at 3 days3 (U)4 (U)6 (E)3 (I)4 (U)6.5 (E)3 (E)5 (E)8 (A)*
    Med r/v at 1–2 weeks7 (U)7.5 (A)8 (A)7 (E)8 (A)9 (A)8 (E)9 (A)8.5 (A)
    Med r/v at 1 month8 (A)7.5 (U)6.5 (E)8 (A)7 (A)*6 (E)8 (A)7 (A)*5.5 (D)
    Med r/v at 3 months5.5 (D)5 (E)3 (E)5 (E)3 (U)2 (I)4.5 (E)3 (I)2 (I)
    • The colour of each cell represents the result with the highest consensus. Grey cells are given where consensus was not reached. A = appropriate. A* = appropriate but with a lower average certainty. AKI = acute kidney injury. D = disagreement. E = equivocal. I = inappropriate. Med r/v = medication review. SCr = serum creatinine. U = agreement with uncertain benefit.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Summary of timeliness for performing the first post-discharge serum creatinine test.
    Serum creatinine monitoring ratingsAKI Warning Stage 1AKI Warning Stage 2AKI Warning Stage 3
    Kidney recovery (SCr % above baseline)≤ 25%>25% & <50%≥ 50%≤ 25%>25% & <50%≥ 50%≤ 25%>25% & <50%≥ 50%
    Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)
    No past medical historyNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    SCr at 3 days1 (I)1.5 (I)3 (E)1.5 (I)2.5 (I)3.5 (E)2 (I)3.5 (E)5.5 (E)
    SCr at 1–2 weeks2.5 (I)3.5 (D)7 (U)2.5 (E)6 (D)8 (A)4 (E)7.5 (A)8 (A)
    SCr at 1 month5 (E)7.5 (E)8 (A)7.5 (E)8.5 (A)7.5 (E)7.5 (E)8 (A)6.5 (E)
    SCr at 3 months8 (A)7 (E)5.5 (D)7.5 (E)7 (E)4 (D)7.5 (E)6 (E)4 (E)
    Chronic kidney diseaseNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    SCr at 3 days3 (I)3.5 (E)4.5 (E)2.5 (I)3 (E)6 (E)3 (I)4 (E)6 (E)
    SCr at 1–2 weeks4.5 (D)6.5 (U)7 (E)5.5 (E)8 (A)8 (A)7 (E)8 (A)9 (A)
    SCr at 1 month8 (A)8 (A)8 (E)8 (A)8 (A)*7.5 (E)8 (A)7.5 (E)6 (E)
    SCr at 3 months6.5 (E)6 (D)5 (D)6.5 (E)6 (E)3.5 (E)5 (D)3 (E)1.5 (E)
    Chronic heart failureNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    SCr at 3 days2.5 (I)4 (E)5 (U)3.5 (U)4.5 (U)6 (E)3.5 (U)6 (U)7 (A)*
    SCr at 1–2 weeks7 (U)8 (A)9 (A)7.5 (A)*8 (A)9 (A)7.5 (A)8 (A)8 (A)
    SCr at 1 month8 (A)7.5 (A)*6 (E)8 (A)7 (E)4.5 (E)7.5 (U)6.5 (E)3.5 (E)
    SCr at 3 months5 (D)3.5 (E)2.5 (I)4.5 (E)3 (E)1.5 (I)4.5 (E)2 (I)1.5 (I)
    Chronic kidney disease & chronic heart failureNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    SCr at 3 days3.5 (E)5 (U)6 (U)3 (E)4.5 (U)7 (U)5 (E)6 (U)8 (A)*
    SCr at 1–2 weeks7.5 (A)*8 (A)9 (A)8 (A)8 (A)9 (A)8 (A)9 (A)8.5 (A)
    SCr at 1 month7.5 (A)7 (E)7 (E)7.5 (E)6.5 (E)4 (D)7.5 (E)4.5 (E)3 (E)
    SCr at 3 months3 (E)3 (E)2.5 (I)2.5 (E)2.5 (E)1.5 (I)2.5 (E)2.5 (I)1.5 (I)
    Other significant cardiovascular risk factorsNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    SCr at 3 days2 (I)3 (U)4 (U)3 (E)3 (E)4.5 (E)3 (U)4 (E)6 (E)
    SCr at 1–2 weeks4.5 (E)7 (U)8 (A)5.5 (E)8 (A)8.5 (A)7 (A)*8 (A)8 (A)
    SCr at 1 month7.5 (A)8 (A)7.5 (A)*8 (A)7 (A)*7 (U)8.5 (A)7 (U)6.5 (E)
    SCr at 3 months5.5 (E)4.5 (E)3.5 (E)4.5 (E)3.5 (E)3 (I)4.5 (E)2.5 (E)2 (I)
    Markers of vulnerabilityNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    SCr at 3 days3 (I)3.5 (E)4.5 (U)2.5 (I)3.5 (E)4.5 (E)3 (E)4 (E)6 (E)
    SCr at 1–2 weeks5 (E)7 (U)8 (A)5 (E)8 (A)8.5 (A)7 (E)8 (A)8.5 (A)
    SCr at 1 month8 (A)8 (A)7 (A)*8 (A)7.5 (A)*7.5 (A)*8 (A)7 (A)*7 (E)
    SCr at 3 months6 (U)5.5 (E)4.5 (E)5.5 (E)4 (E)2.5 (E)5 (D)3.5 (E)2 (I)
    Other markers of frailtyNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    SCr at 3 days2.5 (I)3 (U)3 (U)2 (I)3 (E)4 (E)3 (I)4 (E)6 (E)
    SCr at 1–2 weeks4 (D)7 (E)8 (A)5.5 (E)8 (A)9 (A)7 (E)8 (A)9 (A)
    SCr at 1 month8 (A)8 (A)7 (A)*8 (A)8 (A)*7.5 (A)*8 (A)7 (A)*6.5 (E)
    SCr at 3 months6.5 (E)5 (E)3.5 (E)5.5 (E)4 (E)2 (I)4.5 (E)3 (E)2 (I)
    • The colour of each cell represents the result with the highest consensus. Grey cells are given where consensus was not reached. A = appropriate. A* = appropriate but with a lower average certainty. AKI = acute kidney injury. D = disagreement. E = equivocal. I = inappropriate. SCr = serum creatinine. U = agreement with uncertain benefit.

    • View popup
    Table 5. Summary of timeliness for performing the first post-discharge urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.
    Urine ACR ratingsAKI Warning Stage 1AKI Warning Stage 2AKI Warning Stage 3
    Kidney recovery (SCr % above baseline)≤ 25%>25% & <50%≥ 50%≤ 25%>25% & <50%≥ 50%≤ 25%>25% & <50%≥ 50%
    Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)Median (Rating)
    No past medical historyNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    UACR at 1 Month2.5 (I)2 (I)2 (I)2 (E)2 (E)2 (E)2 (E)2 (E)2 (E)
    UACR at 3 Months9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)
    Chronic kidney diseaseNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    UACR at 1 Month2.5 (E)2.5 (E)2.5 (E)2.5 (E)2.5 (E)2.5 (E)2.5 (E)2.5 (E)3 (E)
    UACR at 3 Months9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)
    Chronic heart failureNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    UACR at 1 Month3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)
    UACR at 3 Months9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)
    Chronic kidney disease & chronic heart failureNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    UACR at 1 Month3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)3.5 (E)
    UACR at 3 Months9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)
    Other significant cardiovascular risk factorsNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    UACR at 1 Month4 (E)4 (E)4 (E)4 (E)4 (E)4 (D)4 (E)4 (D)4 (D)
    UACR at 3 Months9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)
    Markers of vulnerabilityNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    UACR at 1 Month3 (E)3 (E)3 (E)3 (E)3 (E)3 (E)3 (E)3 (E)3 (E)
    UACR at 3 Months9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)
    Other markers of frailtyNot required1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)1 (I)
    UACR at 1 Month2 (E)2 (E)2 (E)2 (E)2 (E)2 (I)2 (E)2 (E)2 (E)
    UACR at 3 Months9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)9 (A)
    • In all urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio scenarios, the highest consensus was to perform the first test at 3 months (all cells coloured green to reflect highest consensus). A = appropriate. AKI = acute kidney injury. D = disagreement. E = equivocal. I = inappropriate. SCr = serum creatinine. U = agreement with uncertain benefit. UACR = urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 4, Issue 3
August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Guidance for post-discharge care following acute kidney injury: an appropriateness ratings evaluation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Guidance for post-discharge care following acute kidney injury: an appropriateness ratings evaluation
Jung Yin Tsang, Jonathan Murray, Edward Kingdon, Charlie Tomson, Kyle Hallas, Stephen Campbell, Tom Blakeman
BJGP Open 2020; 4 (3): bjgpopen20X101054. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101054

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Guidance for post-discharge care following acute kidney injury: an appropriateness ratings evaluation
Jung Yin Tsang, Jonathan Murray, Edward Kingdon, Charlie Tomson, Kyle Hallas, Stephen Campbell, Tom Blakeman
BJGP Open 2020; 4 (3): bjgpopen20X101054. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101054
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • acute kidney injury
  • heart failure
  • patient discharge
  • primary health care
  • General practice

More in this TOC Section

  • How do UK general practice staff understand and manage prediabetes? A focus group study
  • Study of the sensitivity and specificity of smell and taste disorders as a predictive factor of SARS-CoV-2 infection among primary care healthcare professionals: a retrospective observational study
  • Exploring the impact of the national extended access scheme on patient experience of and satisfaction with general practice: an observational study using the English GP Patient Survey
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2022 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795