Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Outreach
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • Feedback
    • Alerts
    • Conference
    • eLetters
    • Audio abstracts
    • Past research calls
  • RESEARCH CALL: TELEHEALTH
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Advertisement
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Outreach
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • Feedback
    • Alerts
    • Conference
    • eLetters
    • Audio abstracts
    • Past research calls
  • RESEARCH CALL: TELEHEALTH
Practice & Policy

Beyond symptoms: why do patients see the doctor?

André Hajek and Hans-Helmut König
BJGP Open 2020; 4 (2): bjgpopen20X101088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101088
André Hajek
1 Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: a.hajek@uke.de
Hans-Helmut König
1 Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
  • Doctor visits
  • General practitioner
  • Andersen model
  • Psychosocial
  • Personality
  • Primary health care
  • General practice
  • Locus of control
  • Preventive healthcare use

Introduction

Why look at the determinants of doctor visits? Knowledge about the determinants of healthcare use is important to manage healthcare use, and to avoid its misuse as well as over- and under-use. To date, most studies examining the determinants of healthcare use refer to the widely-applied Andersen model. This model distinguishes between predisposing characteristics (such as sex or age), enabling resources (such as income or status of health insurance), and need factors (such as self-rated health or chronic conditions). A systematic review published in 2012 showed that need factors are important determining factors for individual healthcare service use.1 However, it appears plausible that other factors are also important, such as (1) personality characteristics (for example, neuroticism), or (2) psychosocial factors like loneliness (the state in which a person’s social network is smaller or less satisfying than desired), or life satisfaction (cognitive evaluation of life as a whole).

Recent findings

Let’s take a closer look at some recent findings. Adjusting for various covariates included in the Andersen model, it was shown that personality factors, such as extraversion and neuroticism, are related to physician visit rates in the US and Germany.2,3 Extraverted individuals are, for example, talkative, outgoing, energetic, and sociable; therefore, extraverted individuals may have a more risk-prone (and injury-related) lifestyle. Furthermore, extraversion is associated with smoking and alcohol intake. A more speculative explanation may be that extraverted individuals may talk with their friends or acquaintances about their ailments, and their peer-group may encourage the extraverted individuals to visit the doctor. Neuroticism refers to the tendency to experience negative emotional states (including anxiety, depression, or anger). Factors such as negative emotions or perceived stress may lead to more doctor visits. In a 2017 study by the present authors, it was shown that the impact of self-rated health on physician visits differs depending on the level of neuroticism.3 For example, in those with bad self-rated health, neurotic individuals visit the doctor more often compared to less neurotic individuals, which intuitively appears to be plausible.

A further study has shown that external locus of control (the perception that outcomes are based on external factors) is important for physician visits.4 Individuals with high external locus of control may simply think that their health outcomes are based on visiting the doctor more frequently. In other words, patients with a high external locus of control may strongly believe in the fact that their GP can help them. On the other hand, those with a low external locus of control may simply not believe that GPs can treat their ailments.

Additionally, a nationally representative study recently showed that the number of GP visits increased with poorer subjective wellbeing and lower optimism.5 The link between subjective wellbeing and GP visits appears to be plausible because subjective wellbeing is strongly associated with somatic complaints. These complaints are linked to increased visits. Even other psychosocial factors, such as meaning in life, can play a role in physician visits.6

Similar findings were also seen for the determinants of frequent attendance.7,8 This is of particular importance because frequent attendance places a tremendous burden on the healthcare system. For example, a nationally representative study has shown that frequent GP visits are, among other things, associated with lower life satisfaction and self-esteem, and higher negative affect and perceived stress.8 In a 2018 study by Cruwys et al, a higher frequency of primary care attendance was shown to be associated with higher social isolation.7 Similar findings were made for preventive healthcare services.9–11 For example, a link between loneliness at baseline and a subsequent decreased use of the flu vaccine has been demonstrated.12

It is worth stressing that these are not spurious associations that are not generalisable: the findings cited above are based on nationally representative samples, performed sensitivity analyses, and are partly based on longitudinal study designs using regression models specifically designed for longitudinal data. Furthermore, these studies were typically adjusted for various covariates such as sex, age, income, self-rated health, physical illnesses, and depression in regression analysis.

Conclusions

The authors would like to conclude their work with some general recommendations for future research:

  1. This is a call for further interdisciplinary research when examining the determinants of healthcare use. This means, extending understanding of the determinants of healthcare use beyond those detailed in Andersen’s model, to include psychosocial factors and personality characteristics. For example, given demographic ageing and the geographical distance between family members, looking at the direct link between loneliness, social isolation, and doctor visits, particularly among older individuals, may be important. Does the frequency of physician visits change when older individuals lose their spouse, their best friends, or acquaintances?

  2. Future research is required to clarify the role of psychosocial or personality factors that moderate the link between need factors and doctor visits. For example, while one individual with bad self-rated health may avoid visiting the GP, another individual with equally bad self-rated health may be a frequent attender simply because he or she scores high in neuroticism or external locus of control.

  3. These recommendations are not restricted to general healthcare use or frequent GP visits. When analysing the determinants of preventive healthcare services, as already outlined, it is also important to broaden the research perspective. For example, the link between self-esteem and prostate cancer examination in men should be investigated in future research.

  4. The link between psychosocial factors, personality characteristics, and doctor visits should be investigated in more countries (with different healthcare systems). For example, how are personality characteristics and GP visits associated in African or Asian countries?

The authors hope that the current work will inspire new research in this area and determine which other factors (beyond need) determine the frequency of doctor visits.

Notes

Funding

No funding was received for this article.

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer-reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  • Received March 20, 2020.
  • Accepted March 24, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Babitsch B,
    2. Gohl D,
    3. von Lengerke T
    (2012) Re-revisiting Andersen's behavioral model of health services use: a systematic review of studies from 1998-2011. Psychosoc Med 9, doi:10.3205/psm000089, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23133505. Doc11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Friedman B,
    2. Veazie PJ,
    3. Chapman BP,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Is personality associated with health care use by older adults? Milbank Q 91(3):491–527, doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12024, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028697.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hajek A,
    2. Bock J-O,
    3. König H-H
    (2017) The role of personality in health care use: results of a population-based longitudinal study in Germany. PLoS One 12(7), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181716, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28746388. e0181716.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hajek A,
    2. König H-H
    (2017) Locus of control and frequency of physician visits: results of a population-based longitudinal study in Germany. Br J Health Psychol 22(3):414–428, doi:10.1111/bjhp.12236, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28345258.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bock J-O,
    2. Hajek A,
    3. König H-H
    (2018) The longitudinal association between psychological factors and health care use. Health Serv Res 53(2):1065–1091, doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12679, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28294328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hajek A,
    2. König H-H
    (2019) Meaning in life and health care use: findings from a nationally representative study of older adults in Germany. BMC Geriatr 19(1):1–6, doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1389-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cruwys T,
    2. Wakefield JRH,
    3. Sani F,
    4. et al.
    (2018) Social isolation predicts frequent attendance in primary care. Ann Behav Med 52(10):817–829, doi:10.1093/abm/kax054, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30212847.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hajek A,
    2. Bock J-O,
    3. König H-H
    (2017) Association of general psychological factors with frequent attendance in primary care: a population-based cross-sectional observational study. BMC Fam Pract 18(1), doi:10.1186/s12875-017-0621-5, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28340559. 48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hajek A,
    2. König H-H ­
    (2017) The role of self-efficacy, self-esteem and optimism for using routine health check-ups in a population-based sample. A longitudinal perspective. Prev Med 105:47–51, doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.030, pmid:28863870.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Hajek A,
    2. Bock J-O,
    3. König H-H
    (2017) The role of general psychosocial factors for the use of cancer screening-Findings of a population-based observational study among older adults in Germany. Cancer Med 6(12):3025–3039, doi:10.1002/cam4.1226, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29030910.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Nolan A,
    2. McCrory C,
    3. Moore P
    (2019) Personality and preventive healthcare utilisation: evidence from the Irish longitudinal study on ageing. Prev Med 120:107–112, doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.029, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30660708.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hajek A,
    2. König H-H
    (2019) Does loneliness predict subsequent use of flu vaccination? Findings from a nationally representative study of older adults in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(24), doi:10.3390/ijerph16244978, pmid:31817845. 4978.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 4, Issue 2
June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Beyond symptoms: why do patients see the doctor?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Beyond symptoms: why do patients see the doctor?
André Hajek, Hans-Helmut König
BJGP Open 2020; 4 (2): bjgpopen20X101088. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101088

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Beyond symptoms: why do patients see the doctor?
André Hajek, Hans-Helmut König
BJGP Open 2020; 4 (2): bjgpopen20X101088. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101088
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Recent findings
    • Conclusions
    • Notes
    • References
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Doctor visits
  • General practitioner
  • Andersen model
  • Psychosocial
  • Personality
  • primary health care
  • general practice
  • Locus of control
  • Preventive healthcare use

More in this TOC Section

  • Augmented Consulting: the future of primary care?
  • Communicating with people with hearing loss: COVID-19 and beyond
  • Improving the utility and sustainability of novel health technology to improve clinical outcomes for patients: an East Staffordshire experience of screening for atrial fibrillation with the AliveCor KardiaMobile
Show more Practice & Policy

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2021 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795