Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Exploring whether teaching activity is a way to improve GPs' satisfaction and wellbeing: a cross-sectional study

Blandine Mooser, Nicolas Senn, François Heritier and Christine Cohidon
BJGP Open 2020; 4 (2): bjgpopen20X101038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101038
Blandine Mooser
1 University of Lausanne, 27213, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicolas Senn
2 Center of General Medicine and Public Health, Department of Family Medicine, Medecin Associé, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
François Heritier
2 Center of General Medicine and Public Health, Department of Family Medicine, Medecin Associé, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Cohidon
2 Center of General Medicine and Public Health, Department of Family Medicine, Medecin Associé, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: christine.cohidon{at}unisante.ch
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Characteristics of participating GPs
    Sociodemographic characteristicsn (%)a
    Sex
     Male155 (78)
     Female44 (22)
    Age, mean (SD)55.0 (8.0)
    Practice locationb
     Rural102 (51)
     Urban95 (48)
    Type of practice
     Group practice104 (52)
     Solo practice95 (48)
    • N = 199. aUnless stated otherwise. bSelf-declared. Missing data (n = 2). SD = standard deviation

    • View popup
    Table 2. Characteristics of the practices' organisation and GPs’ loss of meaning in work
    Practice organisationn (%)a
    Total working hours per week, mean (SD)46.6 (11.6)
    Duration of consultation, minutes, mean (SD)19.6 (5.8)
    Usual time necessary for receiving hospital discharge, daysb
     1–460 (30)
     5–1480 (40)
     15–3038 (19)
     >3014 (7)
    Being GP as unique work activity67 (34)
    Teaching activity61 (31)
    Number of face-to-face patient contacts in a day, mean (SD)24.0 (8:1)
    Number of email patient contacts in a day, mean (SD)1.5 (2.9)
    Number of night on-call duties in the past 3 months, mean (SD)4.4 (10.5)
    Number of weekend on-call duties in the past 3 months, mean (SD)2.1 (5.3)
    Meeting face to face with other GPs
     >1/month120 (60)
    Meeting face to face with hospital specialists
     >1/month42 (21)
    Feeling of lack of respectc
     Strongly disagree12 (6)
     Disagree119 (60)
      Agree53 (27)
     Strongly agree12 (6)
    Administrative overload
     Strongly disagree1 (1)
     Disagree39 (20)
     Agree86 (43)
     Strongly agree73 (37)
    Loss of meaning in workd
     Strongly disagree62 (31)
      Disagree75 (38)
      Agree48 (24)
      Strongly agree13 (7)
    • N = 199. aUnless otherwise stated. bMissing data (n = 7). cMissing data (n = 3). dMissing data (n = 1). SD = standard deviation

    • View popup
    Table 3. Associations (odds ratios) between sociodemographic and work characteristics and GPs’ loss of meaning in work.
    CovariateUnivariate model( N = 199)Final multivariate model( N = 190)
    n OR95% CIOR95% CI
    Sex, female441.150.63 to 2.120.700.35 to 1.39
    Age group, years, ref <50 years49——1—
      50–60950.850.45 to 1.600.980.50 to 1.91
      ≥61550.440.21 to 0.910.520.24 to 1.14
    Practice location, urban951.300.78 to 2.17——
    Type of practice, group practice1041.020.61 to 1.69——
    Working hours per week1951.000.98 to 1.02——
    Duration of consultation1961.020.98 to 1.07——
    Discharge information, >15 days522.681.46 to 4.922.281.20 to 4.35
    Face-to-face contacts per daya 1980.870.75 to 1.020.870.73 to 1.04
    Email patient contacts per day1980.980.90 to 1.07——
    Night on-call duties, n 1831.010.98 to 1.03——
    Weekend on-call duties, n 1830.960.90 to 1.03——
    Meeting with other GPs, >1/month1200.690.41 to 1.17——
    Meeting with hospital specialists, >1/month420.880.48 to 1.64——
    Administrative overload, agree and strongly agree1594.532.28 to 9.014.182.04 to 8.58
    Feeling of lack of respect, agree and strongly agree653.061.73 to 5.402.001.10 to 3.63
    Teaching activity, yes610.520.29 to 0.910.500.27 to 0.90
    • aUnit = five consultations. OR = odds ratio.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 4, Issue 2
June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exploring whether teaching activity is a way to improve GPs' satisfaction and wellbeing: a cross-sectional study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Exploring whether teaching activity is a way to improve GPs' satisfaction and wellbeing: a cross-sectional study
Blandine Mooser, Nicolas Senn, François Heritier, Christine Cohidon
BJGP Open 2020; 4 (2): bjgpopen20X101038. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101038

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Exploring whether teaching activity is a way to improve GPs' satisfaction and wellbeing: a cross-sectional study
Blandine Mooser, Nicolas Senn, François Heritier, Christine Cohidon
BJGP Open 2020; 4 (2): bjgpopen20X101038. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101038
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method​
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • general practitioners
  • primary health care
  • teaching activity
  • loss of meaning in work
  • job satisfaction

More in this TOC Section

  • Checklists for emergencies in general practice: Participatory design of a quick reference handbook
  • Factors affecting the likelihood of documented medication concerns in patients with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional study in primary care
  • GPs’ perspectives regarding suicide prevention: a systematic scoping review
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795