Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1. PRISMA diagram of participant inclusion.
- Figure 2. Comparison of percentage of patients achieving treatment targets in 2017 cycle-of-care sample compared with the UK National Diabetes Audit (2015–2016). BP = blood pressure. HbA1c = glycosylated haemoglobin. TC = total cholesterol.
Tables
- Table 1. Comparison of care processes over time (2014–2017) to UK National Diabetes Audit 2015–2016
Care processes Pre-COC (2014),
n= 3146, n (%)COC (2017),n= 3146, n (%) UK National
Diabetes Audit
(2015–2016),
n= 2 500 698, n (%)HbA1c 53 98 95 Total cholesterol 59 99 93 Creatinine 9 80 9 5 ACR 10 42 67 BP 61 98 9 6 BMI 40 97 82 Attending or referred to retinopathy screening NR 76 NR Foot review NR 6 5 87 Influenza immunisation offered NR 70 NR ACR = urinary albumin:creatinine ratio. BMI = body mass index. BP = blood pressure. COC = cycle of care. HbA1c = glycosylated haemoglobin. NR = not recorded.
- Table 2. Comparison of values of HbA1c, TC, and BP for patients with data recorded for 2014 and 2017
Parameter and target range Total sample size, n a 2014, % within target range 2017, % within target range P value b HbA1c ≤58 mmol/mol 1665 76 72 < 0.001 TC <5 mmol/litre 1851 76 83 <0.001 BP ≤140/80 mmHg 1904 42 55 <0.001 aPatients with data measured in 2014 and 2017. bFrom McNemar’s test for paired nominal data.
Supplementary Data
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
- bjgpopen20X101021_Supp.pdf -
Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.
In this issue
The effect of ‘paying for performance’ on the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional observational study
LinkedIn
Jump to section
Keywords
More in this TOC Section
Related Articles
Cited By...
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
