Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Practice & Policy

Research evidence is essential for the development of family medicine as a discipline in the Japanese healthcare system

Makoto Kaneko, Ai Oishi, Yoshinori Matsui, Junichiro Miyachi, Takuya Aoki and Maria Mathews
BJGP Open 2019; 3 (2): bjgpopen19X101650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101650
Makoto Kaneko
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
2 GP, Shizuoka Family Medicine Programme, Akatsuchi, Kikugawa, Shizuoka, Japan
PhD, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Makoto Kaneko
  • For correspondence: makotok@hama-med.ac.jp
Ai Oishi
3 PhD Student, Primary Palliative Care Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
MSc, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshinori Matsui
4 GP, Azai-higashi Clinic, Nagahama, Shiga, Japan
5 GP, The Hokkaido Centre for Family Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junichiro Miyachi
4 GP, Azai-higashi Clinic, Nagahama, Shiga, Japan
5 GP, The Hokkaido Centre for Family Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
MSc, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takuya Aoki
6 Assistant Professor, Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
MMA, PhD, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Mathews
7 Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, London, ON, Canada
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
  • Family medicine
  • health care system
  • Japan

Japan is facing an extraordinary rapid ageing rate: approximately 40% of people will be ≥65 years of age in 2060.1 The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) have highlighted the importance of primary care physicians for coping with the ageing population and reducing healthcare expenditure.2 However, a range of stakeholders such as MHLW and the Japan Medical Association (JMA) have been debating the necessity of family medicine as a medical discipline in the Japanese healthcare system. We examined the necessity of family medicine based on the existing discussion in the Japanese healthcare system and propose future research in this area.

The main characteristics of the healthcare system in Japan are universal health insurance and a free-access system, whereby patients are free to choose any healthcare facility, regardless of their insurance status or severity of illness.3 All residents of Japan including foreign nationals with a residence card are required by law to be enrolled in a health insurance programme.4 The free-access system allows patients to visit a hospital directly without referral from a family physician.3 Although the Japanese healthcare system has achieved better healthcare outcomes, such as long life expectancy and low infant mortality, it is facing two major challenges: financial sustainability of the system and a rapidly ageing population.3 Therefore, the MHLW has emphasised strengthening primary care.

A report on board certification by the MHLW included the competencies of family physicians such as comprehensiveness, continuity of care, and care for people with multimorbidities.2 However, this and other reports by the MHLW often do not cite peer-reviewed articles, but rather present arguments from the bureaucracy or an ‘expert’ panel. Also, a review about the Japanese healthcare system by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) emphasised a need for strengthening primary care.5 It indicates that primary care in Japan has been delivered by ‘semi-generalists/semi-specialists’, which are ‘physicians who leave hospital practice after an unspecified amount of time to set up as generalists (with no compulsory further training) in the community.’5 The OECD review insists on fostering primary care specialists to provide comprehensive and longitudinal care. To achieve this, the review recommended support for the creation of academic departments of family medicine, development of postgraduate training, introduction of rostering patients, capitation, and nurse-led primary care.5 Nevertheless, the review did not demonstrate any tangible target values such as minimum necessary budgets for fostering family physicians to support its recommendations.

The JMA, one of the biggest stakeholders in Japanese health care, had been cautious about the introduction of family medicine as a specialty, because they have considered that existing doctors in the JMA (semi-generalists/semi-specialists) can offer sufficient primary care without official training in family medicine.6 The JMA has also been apprehensive about the creation of a family medicine specialty since they believe it will lead to the introduction of capitation, which they assume will obstruct professional autonomy.6 Notably, the JMA has been gradually changing their cautious attitude; for example, the JMA has recently suggested a collaboration with certified family physicians in the future.7 However, as with the arguments from MHLW, these remarks by the JMA are not rigorously based on research evidence but their 'expert' opinions.

Another pertinent issue regarding the introduction of family medicine is the problem that few young doctors become family physicians in Japan.8 One reason is that family medicine is a new discipline in Japan and unfamiliar to medical students, patients, and specialist doctors. Thus, medical students usually do not have enough knowledge about family medicine when choosing their careers. Also, a poorly organised board certification system may contribute to the small numbers of applicants. The Japanese Medical Specialty Board was recently established to achieve high standards for physician specialty certifications with formal clinical training accredited by an independent third party.4 Many societies of specialists felt that their authoritative power was deprived by the Board.4 The Board changed its direction and guidelines in response to this criticism, and during this process, the application system and programme requirement changed repeatedly. Several websites reported that this reduction in Board governance may have negatively affected the number of applicants to family medicine.9 Moreover, other specialties may campaign against family medicine in order to attract young doctors to their own disciplines.9 Although these factors could be associated with young doctors’ decision making, the actual reasons of for why few doctors apply to become family physicians have not been adequately explored. Previous research from 2014 described several factors, such as lack of social recognition for family medicine, that may have a negative impact on a physician’s career choice.10 Further research is needed to explore these reasons.

As discussed, there is a lack of research evidence about the need for and roles of family medicine in Japan. As the current output of clinical research in primary care from Japan is very limited11 development of research capacity is a top priority and identifying high priority research topics is critical to achieve this. Relevant topics could be improving care transitions between primary and secondary care,12 identifying an ideal proportion of the healthcare budget to foster family physicians, exploring young physicians’ and specialists’ perspectives on family medicine, or discussing the role of family physicians in the Japanese healthcare setting. In other Asian countries such as China, medical universities have established family medicine departments and the government has offered financial support to build research capacity.13 Collaboration between the government and universities has been promoted in Malaysia.13 Such activities would be useful for Japanese family medicine.

Notes

Funding

None

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of the Family Medicine Researchers Network: Junji Haruta, Takamasa Watanabe, Yuka Urushibara-Miyachi.

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  • Received March 12, 2019.
  • Accepted April 8, 2019.
  • Copyright © 2019, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. ↵
    1. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
    (2015) Transition in Japanese population (in Japanese). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/seisakunitsuite/bunya/hokabunya/shakaihoshou/dl/07.pdf. 29 May 2019.
  2. ↵
    1. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
    (2013) Report on the desirable situation of board certification (in Japanese). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/2r985200000300ju-att/2r985200000300lb.pdf. 29 May 2019.
  3. ↵
    1. Sakamoto H,
    2. Rahman M,
    3. Nomura S,
    4. et al.
    (2018) Japan health system review. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259941/9789290226260eng.pdf;jsessionid=793E7F28273806A2F763882D242BCB1A?sequence=1. 29 May 2019.
  4. ↵
    1. Iwata K,
    2. Mosby DJ,
    3. Sakane M
    (2017) Board certification in Japan: corruption and near-collapse of reform. Postgrad Med J 93(1101):436, doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-134994.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
    (2015) OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality: Japan 2015. Raising standards. http://www.oecd.org/publications/oecd-reviews-of-health-care-quality-japan-2015-9789264225817-en.htm. 29 May 2019.
  6. ↵
    1. Mihara T
    (2018) To understand revision of the medical payment system (in Japanese). https://www.nli-research.co.jp/report/detail/id=58583&pno=4&more=1?site=nli#anka3. 29 May 2019.
  7. ↵
    1. The JMA Vision Project Team
    (2018) What do physician members do for today's medical challenges? (in Japanese). http://dl.med.or.jp/dl-med/teireikaiken/20180418_2.pdf. 29 May 2019.
  8. ↵
    1. The Japanese Medical Speciality Board
    (2018) Current status of adoption of residency programme (in Japanese). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/05-Shingikai-10801000-Iseikyoku-Soumuka/0000199728.pdf. 29 May 2019.
  9. ↵
    1. m3.com
    (2018) The Japanese Medical Speciality Board had a negative impact on board-certified family physician. Interview with a director of the Japan Primary Care Association (in Japanese). https://www.m3.com/open/iryoIshin/article/592492/. 29 Mar 2019.
  10. ↵
    1. Ie K,
    2. Tahara M,
    3. Murata A,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Factors associated to the career choice of family medicine among Japanese physicians: the dawn of a new era. Asia Pac Fam Med 13(1):11, doi:10.1186/s12930-014-0011-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Aoki T,
    2. Fukuhara S
    (2017) Japanese representation in high-impact international primary care journals (in Japanese). An Off J Japan Prim Care Assoc 40(3):126–130.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Goodyear-Smith F,
    2. Bazemore A,
    3. Coffman M,
    4. et al.
    (2019) Primary care research priorities in low-and middle-income countries. Ann Fam Med 17(1):31–35, doi:10.1370/afm.2329.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Goodyear-Smith F,
    2. Mash B
    (2016) International perspectives on primary care research (CRC Press, Boca Raton).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 3, Issue 2
July 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Research evidence is essential for the development of family medicine as a discipline in the Japanese healthcare system
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research evidence is essential for the development of family medicine as a discipline in the Japanese healthcare system
Makoto Kaneko, Ai Oishi, Yoshinori Matsui, Junichiro Miyachi, Takuya Aoki, Maria Mathews
BJGP Open 2019; 3 (2): bjgpopen19X101650. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101650

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Research evidence is essential for the development of family medicine as a discipline in the Japanese healthcare system
Makoto Kaneko, Ai Oishi, Yoshinori Matsui, Junichiro Miyachi, Takuya Aoki, Maria Mathews
BJGP Open 2019; 3 (2): bjgpopen19X101650. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101650
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Family medicine
  • health care system
  • Japan

More in this TOC Section

  • Potentially inappropriate prescribing in middle-aged adults: a significant problem with a lack of action and evidence to address it
  • The BJGP Open Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of 2024: an editorial
  • The overlooked challenges facing out-of-hours primary care in the NHS: a missed opportunity in policy
Show more Practice & Policy

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795