Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Effectiveness of delivering integrated COPD care at public healthcare facilities: a cluster randomised trial in Pakistan

Muhammad Amir Khan, Nida Khan, John D Walley, Muhammad Ahmar Khan, Joseph Hicks, Maqsood Ahmed, Faisal Imtiaz Sheikh, Muhammad Ali, Farooq Manzoor and Haroon Jehangir Khan
BJGP Open 2019; 3 (1): bjgpopen18X101634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101634
Muhammad Amir Khan
1Chief Coordinating Professional, Association for Social Development, , Pakistan
DHA, MPH, PhD, FFPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nida Khan
2Project Coordinator, Association for Social Development, , Pakistan
MSc, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nidakhan{at}asd.com.pk
John D Walley
3Professor of International Public Health, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, , UK
MComH, FFPH, MRCGP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muhammad Ahmar Khan
4Research Coordinator, Association for Social Development, , Pakistan
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Hicks
5Senior Medical Statistician, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, , UK
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maqsood Ahmed
6Senior Professional, Association for Social Development, , Pakistan
MBBS, MPhil (Public Health)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Faisal Imtiaz Sheikh
7Research Coordinator, Association for Social Development, , Pakistan
MS, PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muhammad Ali
8Research Assistant, Association for Social Development, , Pakistan
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Farooq Manzoor
9Provincial Manager, Non-Communicable Disease Control Program, Directorate General of Health Services, , Pakistan
MBBS, MBA, MPhil (Public Health)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haroon Jehangir Khan
10Director, NCD & Mental Health, Directorate General of Health Services, , Pakistan
BSc, MA HMPP, MPH, FRIPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. CONSORT trial flow chart

Tables

  • Figures
  • ABC
    InputsIntervention arm facilitiesControl arm facilities
    Contextualised care protocols and toolsCase management desk guide and counselling toolNone
    Training of doctors and allied staff (jointly by the programme staff and research team)Full care tasks: screen on the first visit, diagnose, and maintain patient records; use provided desk guide on how to prescribe, educate, follow-up, and retrieve patientsLimited care tasks: screen on the first visit, diagnose, and maintain patient records only
    Material inputsPeak flow meter, recording tools; also salbutamol and ipratropium inhalers, mobile reminders for patient retrievalPeak flow meter, and recording tools only
    • Access to spirometry at baseline (that is within 2 weeks of registration) and endline (that is completed 6 months after registration) was offered as a research measurement activity (that is not to inform clinical decisions) for all patients in the two trial arms.

  • Clinical featureBODE index score points
    0 1 2 3
    mMRC scale0–1 2 3 4
    6MWD, m≥350 250–349 150–249 ≤149
    FEV1% pred≥65 50–64 36–49 ≤35
    BMI, kg/m2>21 ≤21
    mMRC dyspnoea scale ranges from 0–4:
    • Score 0–1 indicates breathlessness on exercise only, or on brisk walking

    • Score 2 indicates person walks slowly or stops for breath (due to breathlessness)

    • Score 3 indicates person stops for breath in less than 100 m walking

    • Score 4 indicates person is breathless even while dressing


    Distance walked in 6 minutes, contributes 0–3 in the BODE index score. Patient is asked to walk for 6 minutes and his/her score is calculated as below:
    • Score 0 indicates ≥350 m walking

    • Score 1 indicates 250–349 m walking

    • Score 2 indicates 150–249 m walking

    • Score 3 indicates ≤149 m walking


    The spirometry (FEV1% pred.) contributes 0–3 in the BODE index score:
    • Score 0 ≥65 FEV1% pred. (FEV1 is 65% or more of the predicted amount)

    • Score 1 ≥50-64 FEV1% pred. (FEV1 is 50–64% of the predicted amount)

    • Score 2 ≥36-49 FEV1% pred. (FEV1 is 36–49% of the predicted amount)

    • Score 3 ≤35 FEV1% pred. (FEV1 is 35% or less of the predicted amount)


    Body mass index (relates height with weight), contributes 0–1 in the BODE index score
    • Score 0 indicates BMI >21

    • Score 1 indicates BMI ≤21

    • Extracted from the doctors’ training module, developed as part of intervention.

    • 6MWD = six-minute walk distance. BODE = Body mass index, airway Obstruction, Dyspnoea, Exercise capacity. BMI = body mass index. mMRC = modified Medical Research Council.

    • View popup
    Table 1. Baseline characteristics
    CharacteristicsIntervention, n (%) Control, n (%)
    Clusters
    Total1515
    Doctors
    Male15 (100.0)15 (100.0)
    Female0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    Paramedics
    Male15 (100.0)15 (100.0)
    Female0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    Participants
    Total159 (50.8)154 (49.2)
    Mean cluster size, ±SD10.60 ± 3.8510.27 ± 3.90
    Male122 (76.7)111 (72.1)
    Female37 (23.3)43 (27.9)
    Mean age, years, ±SD48.11 ± 13.8948.47 ± 12.86
    Not educated104 (70.7)102 (72.3)
    Primary (grade 1–5)16 (10.9)15 (10.6)
    Secondary (grade 6–12)24 (16.3)22 (15.6)
    Above secondary (grade >12)3 (2.0)2 (1.4)
    Mean BMI, kg/m2, ±SD22.47 ± 4.7922.45 ± 5.93
    Diagnosed with COPD159 (100.0)154 (100.0)
    Smoker59 (37.11)54 (35.06)
    Mean BODE index score, ±SDa3.85 ± 1.943.78 ± 1.88
    Mean PEFR value, ±SD232.97 ± 100.88246.81 ± 108.73
    Mean weight, kg, ±SD58.69 ± 13.1858.24 ± 14.09
    Mean height, inches, ±SD63.68 ± 3.8363.63 ± 3.85
    • aSpirometry was done by an external assessor within 15 days of diagnosis and/or registration.

    • BODE = Body mass index, airway Obstruction, Dyspnoea, Exercise capacity. BMI = body mass index. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PEFR = peak expiratory flow rate. SD = standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Primary and secondary outcomes
    Mean outcome
    (95% CI)a
    Crude intervention-
    control difference
    (95% CI);
    P valueb
    Adjusted intervention-
    control difference
    (95% CI);
    P valueb
    Intervention
    (clusters = 15)
    Control
    (clusters = 15)
    Primary outcomes
    BODE index
    score changec
    -1.67
    (-2.18 to -1.16)
    -0.66
    (-1.09 to -0.22)
    -1.01
    (-1.65 to -0.37);
    0.003
    -0.96
    (-1.49 to -0.44);
    0.001
    COPD controld66.88%
    (54.99 to 78.77)
    38.20%
    (22.35 to 54.06)
    28.68%
    (9.68 to 47.67);
    0.005
    29.03%
    (12.41 to 45.64);
    0.001
    Secondary outcome
    Quit rate
    among smokerse
    53.90%
    (34.98 to 72.82)
    17.52%
    (7.36 to 27.69)
    36.38%
    (15.66 to 57.10);
    0.002
    31.98%
    (15.42 to 48.54);
    0.001
    Follow-up
    adherencef
    65.54%
    (52.64 to 78.44)
    25.17%
    (14.86 to 35.47)
    40.38%
    (24.57 to 56.18);
    <0.001
    40.40%
    (24.15 to 56.67);
    <0.001
    • aArm-specific mean outcomes and their 95% confidence intervals are calculated from cluster-level mean and/or proportion summary values of outcomes. bAll intervention minus control differences (that is, intervention effect estimates) are based on crude and/or covariate-adjusted analysis of cluster-level mean and/or proportion summary values of outcomes. cBODE index score change calculated as outcome at 6-month follow-up minus outcome at baseline. dCOPD control defined as BODE index ≤ 2 at 6-month follow-up. eQuit rate among smokers calculated as smokers who had quit smoking at 6-month follow-up. fFollow-up adherence defined as attending ≥4 follow-up visits. All analyses use only complete cases.

    • BODE = Body mass index, airway Obstruction, Dyspnoea, Exercise capacity. CI = confidence intervals. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 3, Issue 1
April 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of delivering integrated COPD care at public healthcare facilities: a cluster randomised trial in Pakistan
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of delivering integrated COPD care at public healthcare facilities: a cluster randomised trial in Pakistan
Muhammad Amir Khan, Nida Khan, John D Walley, Muhammad Ahmar Khan, Joseph Hicks, Maqsood Ahmed, Faisal Imtiaz Sheikh, Muhammad Ali, Farooq Manzoor, Haroon Jehangir Khan
BJGP Open 2019; 3 (1): bjgpopen18X101634. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101634

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Effectiveness of delivering integrated COPD care at public healthcare facilities: a cluster randomised trial in Pakistan
Muhammad Amir Khan, Nida Khan, John D Walley, Muhammad Ahmar Khan, Joseph Hicks, Maqsood Ahmed, Faisal Imtiaz Sheikh, Muhammad Ali, Farooq Manzoor, Haroon Jehangir Khan
BJGP Open 2019; 3 (1): bjgpopen18X101634. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101634
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • LinkedIn logo LinkedIn
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
  • Bluesky logo Bluesky

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Pakistan
  • public health facilities
  • COPD
  • Integrated care package
  • primary care
  • general practice

More in this TOC Section

  • Exploring psychotropic medication use in Dutch primary care: trends, prevalence, and associations with polypsychopharmacy
  • Professionals’ views and experiences of the TrainDEEP (TRaining Assistance INitiative in DEep End Practices) pilot: transforming GP practices into training practices in disadvantaged areas in the North East of England
  • The work of the consultation in general practice: a comparison of affluent and deprived areas of Scotland using a novel consultation workload index
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795