Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities

Felicity Veal, Mackenzie Williams, Luke Bereznicki, Elizabeth Cummings and Tania Winzenberg
BJGP Open 2019; 3 (1): bjgpopen18X101629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101629
Felicity Veal
1Lecturer in Pharmacy Practice, Unit for Medication Outcomes Research & Education (UMORE), Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, , Australia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Felicity.Veal{at}utas.edu.au
Mackenzie Williams
2Lecturer in Pharmacy Practice, Unit for Medication Outcomes Research & Education (UMORE), Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, , Australia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luke Bereznicki
3Professor in Pharmacy Practice, Unit for Medication Outcomes Research & Education (UMORE), Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, , Australia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Cummings
4Senior Lecturer, Nursing and Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, Hobart, University of Tasmania, , Australia
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tania Winzenberg
5Professor in Chronic Disease Management, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, , Australia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Pain management strategies prescribed to the ACF population (n = 477)
    Analgesicn (%)
    Any analgesic438 (91.8)
    Regularly dosed analgesic305 (63.9)
    As required analgesics321 (67.3)
    Both as required and regularly dosed analgesics188 (39.4)
    Only as required analgesics131 (27.5)
    Regularly prescribed paracetamol272 (57.0)
    As required paracetamol212 (44.4)
    Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, regularly dosed16 (3.4)
    Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, as required13 (2.7)
    Tricyclic anti-depressant14 (2.9)
    Gabapentinoids40 (8.4)
    Regularly prescribed opioidsa139 (29.1)
    Buprenorphine patch73 (52.5)
    Extended release oxycodone/naloxone28 (20.1)
    Weak opioids (tramadol; paracetamol with codeine)17 (12.2)
    Immediate release oxycodone11 (7.9)
    Extended release oxycodone8 (5.8)
    Extended release morphine5 (3.6)
    Fentanyl patch5 (3.6)
    Morphine in a syringe driver4 (2.9)
    Immediate release morphine liquid2 (1.4)
    Hydromorphone2 (1.4)
    Tapentadol1 (0.7)
    As required opioidsa169 (35.4)
    Immediate release oxycodone68 (40.2)
    Morphine sulphate injection38 (22.5)
    Paracetamol with codeine36 (21.3)
    Morphine liquid19 (11.2)
    Codeine phosphate12 (7.1)
    Tramadol11 (6.5)
    Hydrocodone4 (2.4)
    Extended release oxycodone/naloxone1 (0.6)
    Fentanyl injection1 (0.6)
    • ↵aPercentage does not equal 100% because some residents were prescribed more than one regular opioid or 'as required' opioid.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Cause of pain and treatment modalities prescribed on ACFI assessment
    n (%)
    Cause of pain (n = 382)
    Musculoskeletal, lower extremities
    Back or neck pain
    Musculoskeletal, upper extremities
    Generalised joint pain
    Visceral pain
    Neuropathic pain
    Post-fracture/osteoporosis pain
    Inflammatory joint conditions
    Headache/migraine
    Cancer-related pain
    191 (50.0)
    134 (35.1)
    112 (29.3)
    32 (8.4)
    17 (4.5)
    15 (3.9)
    13 (3.4)
    13 (3.4)
    11 (2.9)
    3 (0.8)
    Treatment plan (n = 477)aa
    Analgesics
    Heatpacks
    Massage
    Repositioning
    Rest
    Gentle exercise/physiotherapy programme
    One-on-one calming
    Elasticated garment
    Technical equipment, for example TENS
    337 (70.6)
    237 (49.7)
    206 (43.2)
    151 (31.7)
    117 (24.5)
    90 (18.9)
    47 (9.9)
    12 (2.5)
    11 (2.3)
    • ↵aResidents were often documented as having a pain treatment plan even if there were no documented pain causing condition

    • View popup
    Table 3. Baseline demographics and patient characteristics of those with and without dementia
    Residents with dementia, n (%)(n = 215)Residents without dementia, n (%)(n = 262)P value
    Mean age, years (IQR)85.7 (79.7–90.6)87.3 (80.9–91.5)0.07
    Female80 (48.5)177 (56.9)0.26
    Mean number of regular medicines (IQR)7 (5–10)9 (6–12)<0.01
    ACFI pain assessment
    ACFI pain-causing condition163 (75.8)219 (83.6)0.03
    ACFI analgesics135 (64.3)193 (74.2)0.02
    ACFI NPT152 (70.7)211 (80.5)0.01
    Medication chart
    Any analgesia199 (92.6)239 (91.2)0.60
    Regularly prescribed137 (63.7)169 (64.5)0.86
    As required only61 (28.4)70 (27.7)0.69
    RD paracetamol121 (56.3)151 (57.6)0.77
    RD opioid57 (26.5)83 (31.7)0.22
    MEQ RD opioid, mg (IQR)0 (0–6)0 (0–10)0.22
    Pain experience
    ≥2 pain experiences per week30 (14.0)52 (19.8)0.09
    • IQR = interquartile range. NPT= non-pharmacological therapy. MEQ = morphine equivalence. RD = regularly dosed.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 3, Issue 1
April 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities
Felicity Veal, Mackenzie Williams, Luke Bereznicki, Elizabeth Cummings, Tania Winzenberg
BJGP Open 2019; 3 (1): bjgpopen18X101629. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101629

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities
Felicity Veal, Mackenzie Williams, Luke Bereznicki, Elizabeth Cummings, Tania Winzenberg
BJGP Open 2019; 3 (1): bjgpopen18X101629. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101629
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • pain
  • prescribing
  • Care of the elderly
  • Patient groups
  • general practice
  • primary healthcare

More in this TOC Section

  • The role of reflexivity in exploring exclusion in GP training: a qualitative study of GP educators
  • Has the new Scottish GP contract improved GPs’ working lives in deprived areas? A secondary analysis of two cross-sectional national surveys of GPs’ views in 2018 and 2023
  • Challenges in reducing the 10-item CARE Measure to a two-item version: comparison of patients’ preferences with psychometric evaluation in a cross-sectional survey in Scotland
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795