Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

‘More constricting than inspiring’ — GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study

Mads Aage Toft Kristensen, Tina Drud Due, Bibi Hølge-Hazelton, Ann Dorrit Guassora and Frans Boch Waldorff
BJGP Open 2018; 2 (2): bjgpopen18X101591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101591
Mads Aage Toft Kristensen
1 PhD Student, Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Medicine, , Denmark
2 GP, Southern Køge Medical Centre, , Denmark
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mads.kristensen{at}sund.ku.dk
Tina Drud Due
3 Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Medicine, , Denmark
cand scient san publ, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bibi Hølge-Hazelton
4 Professor, Zealand University Hospital, , Denmark
5 Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, , Denmark
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann Dorrit Guassora
6 Associate Professor, Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Medicine, , Denmark
PhD, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frans Boch Waldorff
7 Professor, Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, , Denmark
8 Associate Professor, Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Medicine, , Denmark
PhD, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Box 1. General practice in Denmark.

    Almost the entire Danish population is registered with a GP for primary health care, which is tax-financed and free at the point of use. GPs are private entrepreneurs regulated through collective agreements between the Danish regions and the organisation of GPs. 5 Patients need referrals from their GPs to consult hospital specialists and to access municipal educational self-care support. Consequently, GPs in Denmark act as gatekeepers to other health services and play a key role in chronic care, which is organised through disease management programmes (DMPs).

    • View popup
    Table 1. An example of how GPs are expected to stratify patients with type 2 diabetes, determining the level of chronic care 6
    Disease regulation
    WellPoor
    Self-careHighGeneral practiceGeneral practice
    Specialist care
    LowGeneral practice
    Self-care support
    General practice
    Specialist care
    Self-care support
    • View popup
    Table 2. Personal and demographic details of the GPs who participated in the study, n = 12
    Median age, years (range) 56 (37–69)
    Sex, n
     Male6
     Female6
    Time in practice, years (range) 16 (1–41)
    Practice size
     1 GP6
     2 GPs6
    Practice location
     Village, <5000 inhabitants3
     Town, ≥5000 inhabitants9
    Distance from practice to hospital
     ≤30 minutes' drive, n (range)5 (2–27)
     >30 minutes' drive, n (range)7 (35–51)
    • View popup
    Table 3. Profile of the patient cases that informed discussion in the GP interviews, n = 36
    Age, years
    Mean62.5
    Range37–81
    Sex, n (%)
    Male21(58)
    Female15(42)
    Chronic conditions, n (%)
    Diabetes36(100)
    Heart disease18(50)
    Mental disorder16(44)
    Obesity14(39)
    Addiction (alcohol or cannabis)9(25)
    Musculoskeletal disorders8(22)
    Respiratory disease4(11)
    • View popup
    Box 2. Example of a patient with concurrent mental and somatic diseases. (GP 7)

    Peter is a middle-aged man with schizophrenia and periodic alcohol misuse, who is overweight. He also suffers from type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. His GP had tried to refer Peter to hospital several times, but Peter often cancels or leaves the hospital because he cannot cope in the large hospital setting. The GP finds that Peter has an unbearable feeling of insecurity which is related to his psychiatric disorder. Therefore, the GP manages Peter’s chronic conditions, although she does not see this as the best solution for Peter. They are in weekly contact and Peter gets appointments at very short notice, because he has so many diseases to deal with and his conditions easily exacerbate.

    • View popup
    Box 3. Example of a patient with concurrent somatic diseases. (GP 6)

    John is a retired manual worker in his early seventies who has diabetes and possibly dementia, but he refuses further medical examination. He often shows up at the GP’s surgery without an appointment. The GP has talked frequently to John and his wife about improving disease regulation through diet and exercise, but John has not managed to change his habits. Recently, John’s wife has been diagnosed with cancer and cannot support John as much as before. John lives in the countryside and he disagrees with his wife’s suggestion of moving to the nearby town, although he is at risk of losing his driver’s licence.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 2, Issue 2
July 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
‘More constricting than inspiring’ — GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
‘More constricting than inspiring’ — GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study
Mads Aage Toft Kristensen, Tina Drud Due, Bibi Hølge-Hazelton, Ann Dorrit Guassora, Frans Boch Waldorff
BJGP Open 2018; 2 (2): bjgpopen18X101591. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101591

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
‘More constricting than inspiring’ — GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study
Mads Aage Toft Kristensen, Tina Drud Due, Bibi Hølge-Hazelton, Ann Dorrit Guassora, Frans Boch Waldorff
BJGP Open 2018; 2 (2): bjgpopen18X101591. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101591
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • multimorbidity
  • chronic disease
  • general practice
  • self-care
  • continuity of patient care
  • disease management

More in this TOC Section

  • Patients’ experiences of phosphatidylethanol in hypertension treatment in primary care: qualitative study
  • Implementing a medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people living with frailty and polypharmacy in general practice: a feasibility study
  • A systematic review of the perspectives of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes on behavioural weight management
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795