Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open accessibility statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial fellowships
    • Audio abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • Feedback
    • BJGP Life
    • Advertising
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Conference
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open accessibility statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial fellowships
    • Audio abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • Feedback
    • BJGP Life
    • Advertising
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Conference
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
Research

Are patients in heart failure trials representative of primary care populations? A systematic review

Nicholas D Gollop, John Ford, Pieter Mackeith, Caroline Thurlow, Rachel Wakelin, Nicholas Steel and Robert Fleetcroft
BJGP Open 2018; 2 (1): bjgpopen18X101337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101337
Nicholas D Gollop
1 MRC Clinical Research Fellow in Cardiology, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: n.gollop@uea.ac.uk
John Ford
2 NIHR Clinical Research Fellow, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pieter Mackeith
3 Academic Clinical Fellow in Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Thurlow
4 Academic Clinical Fellow in Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Wakelin
5 Academic Clinical Fellow in Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Steel
6 Professor in Public Health, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Fleetcroft
7 Honorary Senior Fellow, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. PRISMA diagram.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Box 1. New York Heart Association classes of heart failure.4
    ClassPatient symptoms
    INo limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnoea (shortness of breath).
    IISlight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnoea (shortness of breath).
    IIIMarked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnoea.
    IVUnable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.
    • View popup
    Table 1 Example assessment of an extracted paper compared to the reference population
    Class IClass IIClass IIIClass IV
    Reference population, %4736710
    Extracted study, %10254025
    Extracted study with 10% deviation, %0–2015–3530–5015–35
    Closeness of match, %>2011–20>2011–20
    Closeness of match, labelPoorFairPoorFair
    • View popup
    Table 2 Characteristics of included studies
    Study ID ComparisonNumber of participantsPrimary outcomeFollow-up, months
    AREA-CHF 2009 20 Canrenone
    Placebo
    231
    236
    Change in LV diastolic volume12
    BEST 2003 21 Bucindolol
    Placebo
    114
    112
    Death and heart failure hospitalisation composite19
    Borghi 2013 22 Ramipril
    Zofenopril
    73
    102
    Survival73±14
    CARNEBI 2013 23 Carvedilol
    Bisoprolol
    Nebivolol
    61
    crossover
    NYHA class, biochemistry, and physiological testing6 (2 x 3 crossover)
    CELICARD 2000 24 Celiprolol
    Placebo
    62
    62
    Functional score — Goldman score12
    CHARM Added 2003 25 Candesartan
    Placebo
    1011
    1014
    Cardiovascular death or unplanned hospital admissions for worsening CHF34
    CHARM Alternative 2003 26 Candesartan
    Placebo
    1273
    1271
    Cardiovascular death or unplanned hospital admissions for worsening CHF41
    CIBIS 1994 27 Bisoprolol
    Placebo
    320
    321
    All-cause mortality23
    CIBIS 1999 28 Bisoprolol
    Placebo
    1327
    1320
    All-cause mortality16
    Cicoira 2002 29 Spironolactone
    Placebo
    54
    52
    Physiological or functional improvement12
    Cohn 2001 30 Valsartan
    Placebo
    2511
    2499
    All-cause mortality, and combined mortality and morbidity23
    Colucci 1996 31 Carvedilol
    Placebo
    232
    134
    Disease progression and death composite12
    COMET 2003 32 Carvedilol
    Metoprolol
    1511
    1518
    All-cause mortality58
    Dalla-Volta 1999 33 Delapril
    Enalapril
    88
    91
    Physiological or functional improvement12
    ELITE II 2000 34 Losartan
    Captopril
    1578
    1574
    All-cause mortality18
    Kum 2008 35 Add on Irbesartan
    Placebo
    50
    50
    6MHW, Minnesota (QoL), peak exercise capacity on treadmill12
    Liu 2014 36 Metoprolol
    Conventional therapy
    77
    77
    NYHA class, LVESD, LVEDD, LVEF, 6-min walking distance, medication safety6
    MAIN CHF II 2014 37 Bisoprolol
    Carvedilol
    21
    14
    Clinical and functional status, mortality rate8
    MERIT-HF 1999 48 Metoprolol CR
    Placebo
    1990
    2001
    All-cause mortality12
    Munich 1991 38 Captopril
    Placebo
    83
    87
    Cardiovascular-cause mortality33
    Pitt 1999 9 Spironolactone
    Placebo
    822
    841
    All-cause mortality24
    Riegger 1999 39 Candesartan 4 mg
    Candesartan 8 mg
    Candesartan 16 mg
    Placebo
    211
    208
    212
    213
    Increase in exercise tolerance, reduction in NYHA class3
    SENIORS 2005 40 Nevovitol
    Placebo
    1067
    1061
    All-cause mortality and time to first CVD admission21
    SOLVD 1991 41 Enalapril
    Placebo
    1285
    1284
    Clinical and functional status, mortality rate41.4
    SOLVD 1992 42 Enalapril
    Placebo
    2111
    2117
    Clinical and functional status, mortality rate37.4
    Sturm 2000 43 Atenolol
    Placebo
    51
    49
    Worsening heart failure or death24
    US Carvedilol 2001 44 Carvedilol

    Placebo
    Black: 127
    Not Black: 569
    Black: 90
    Not Black: 308
    Ethnicity (self-reported), ejection fraction, clinical status, and major clinical events15
    Yodfat 1991 45 Captopril
    Placebo
    41
    43
    Functional status3
    Zannad 1998 46 Fosinopril
    Placebo
    122
    132
    Cardiovascular mortality and event-free survival12
    Zannad 2011 47 Eplenerone
    Placebo
    1364
    1373
    Cardiovascular mortality and event-free survival21
    • 6MHW = 6-minute hall walk. CHF = congestive heart failure. CVD = cardiovascular disease. LV = left ventricular. LVEDD = left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction. LVESD = left ventricular end-systolic diameter. NYHA = New York Heart Association. QOL = quality of life.

    • View popup
    Table 3 Summary of the ejection fraction <40% cohort for the reference population
    Characteristic Total (n = 72), n (%)
    Mean age, years (SD)69 (9)
    Female14 (19)
    Male58 (81)
    Ever smoked50 (69)
    Non-white2 (3)
    Any electrocardiogram abnormality2 (3)
    Mean height, metres (SD)1.71 (0.09)
    Mean weight, kg (SD)80.8 (14.6)
    Mean heart rate, beats per min (SD)77.3 (17.8)
    Mean forced expiratory volume at 1 second, litres (SD)2.11 (0.76)
    Mean forced vital capacity, litres (SD)2.55 (0.85)
    Mean systolic blood pressure, mmHg (SD)148.4 (21.1)
    Mean diastolic blood pressure, mmHg (SD)87.1 (12.3)
    New York Heart Association class
    I34 (47)
    II26 (36)
    III5 (7)
    IV7 (10)
    History
    Myocardial ischaemia38 (53)
    Angina26 (36)
    Hypertension28 (39)
    Diabetes11 (15)
    Family myocardial ischaemia (age <65 years)25 (35)
    Medication taken
    ACE inhibitors19 (26)
    Diuretics26 (36)
    Beta-blockers9 (13)
    Calcium antagonists15 (21)
    Aspirin38 (53)
    Digoxin 5 (7)
    • SD = standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table 4. NYHA classification in heart failure RCTs compared to the reference population.
    NYHA class 5
    Heart failure RCTsNIa, %IIb, %IIIc, %IVd, %
    SOLVD 1992422811–20<10<10<10
    Munich 199117011–2011–2011–20<10
    Borghi 201317511–2011–2011–20<10
    US Carvedilol 19961094>20<10>20<10
    Liu 2014154>20<10>20<10
    CHARM Added 20032548>20<10>20<10
    MERIT-HF 19993991>20<10>20<10
    Zannad 1998254>20>20<10<10
    CELICARD 2000124>2011–20>20<10
    CHARM Alternative 20032028>2011–20>20<10
    SENIORS 20052128>2011–20>20<10
    SOLVD 19912569>2011–20>20<10
    COMET 20033029>2011–20>20<10
    Cicoira 2002106  e
     e
     e
     e
    CARNEBI 2013183>20>20<10>20
    MAIN CHF II 201459>20>20<10>20
    Colucci 1996366>20>20<10>20
    Zannad 20112737>20>20>20<10
    Sturm 2000100>20>20>20<10
    Cohn 20015010>20>20>20<10
    CIBIS 1994641>20>20>20<10
    CIBIS 19992647>20>20>20<10
    ELITE II 20003152>2011–20>20>20
    Kum 2008100>2011–20>20>20
    Rieger 1999844>20>2011–20>20
    BEST 2003226>20>20>20>20
    Dalla-Volta 1999179>20>20>20>20
    AREA-CHF 2009382>20>20>20>20
    Pitt 19991663>20>20>20>20
    Yodfat 199184 e  e
     e
     e
    • a47% of reference population. b36% of reference poulation. c7% of reference population. d10% of reference population. eInsufficient information to calculate deviation. RCT = randomised controlled trial. NYHA = New York Heart Association.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 2, Issue 1
April 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Are patients in heart failure trials representative of primary care populations? A systematic review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Are patients in heart failure trials representative of primary care populations? A systematic review
Nicholas D Gollop, John Ford, Pieter Mackeith, Caroline Thurlow, Rachel Wakelin, Nicholas Steel, Robert Fleetcroft
BJGP Open 2018; 2 (1): bjgpopen18X101337. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101337

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Are patients in heart failure trials representative of primary care populations? A systematic review
Nicholas D Gollop, John Ford, Pieter Mackeith, Caroline Thurlow, Rachel Wakelin, Nicholas Steel, Robert Fleetcroft
BJGP Open 2018; 2 (1): bjgpopen18X101337. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101337
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Funding
    • Ethical approval
    • Provenance
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • heart failure
  • Primary Health Care
  • drug treatment
  • guidelines

More in this TOC Section

  • Long-term, high-dose opioid prescribing for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care
  • A prospective multicentre feasibility study of a novel digital rectoscope for the triage of lower gastrointestinal symptoms in primary care
  • Use of DOACs in primary care: An integration of patient and practitioner perspectives
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2022 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795