Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Capturing complexity in clinician case-mix: classification system development using GP and physician associate data

Mary Halter, Louise Joly, Simon de Lusignan, Robert L Grant, Heather Gage and Vari M Drennan
BJGP Open 2018; 2 (1): bjgpopen18X101277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101277
Mary Halter
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education, Kingston University & St George's, University of London, , UK
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: maryhalter@sgul.kingston.ac.uk
Louise Joly
2 Research Fellow, Social Care Workforce Unit, King's College London, , UK
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon de Lusignan
3 Professor of Primary Care and Clinical Informatics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, , UK
MSc, MD, FRCGP, FBCS CITP, FHEA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L Grant
4 Honorary Research Fellow, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education, Kingston University & St George's, University of London, , UK
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Gage
5 Professor of Health Economics, School of Economics, University of Surrey, , UK
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vari M Drennan
6 Professor of Health Care and Policy Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education, Kingston University & St George's, University of London, , UK
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Box 1. Definitions of terms used within the case-mix classification system (CMCS)
    TermDefinition used in the CMCS
    Acuity Severity, intensity, and immediacy of care required for a presenting condition in a patient.
    Complexity Interaction between existing conditions and the condition the patient presents with.
    Hierarchy Ranking by relative status of acuity and complexity.
    Categorisation Assigning each presenting condition to a category defined by acuity.
    Classification Assigning each person into a hierarchical system according to their condition category or categories.
    Case-mix The mix of patients, according to their classification.
    • View popup
    Box 2. Primary care case-mix and complexity index
    Case-mix and complexity index classificationDefinition of the classificationDefinition of the classification for each patient
    Acute 1. Recent or rapid onset and of short duration (<4 weeks), such as acute pain.
    2. Serious, sometimes requiring immediate intervention, such as acute abdomen.52
    ≥1 problem the patient presents with is classified as acute by de Jong et al 22 or by current authors.
    Chronic (synonym: longterm)
    As used in ICPC relating to an illness or disability of ≥6 months duration.52
    Patient has no acute problems; AND patient has a chronic condition, as recorded on a disease register, (with any presenting problem) OR ≥1 problem the patient presents with is classified as chronic.
    Minor problem or symptom Minor acute illnesses include some of the commonest problems presented in general practice, such as upper respiratory tract infections or skin rashes.53 Patient has no acute problems, no record on a disease register, no chronic problems, AND ≥1 problem the patient presents with is classified as a minor problem or symptom by de Jong et al 22 or the current authors.
    Prevention Action to avoid occurrence or development of a health problem and/or its complications. Can be divided into four categories:
    • Primary prevention: action taken to avoid or remove the cause of a health problem in an individual or a population before it arises. Includes health promotion and specific protection, such as immunisation.

    • Secondary prevention: action taken to detect a health problem at an early stage in an individual or a population, thereby facilitating cure, or reducing or preventing it spreading, or reducing or preventing its long-term effects (for example, methods, screening, case finding, and early diagnosis).

    • Tertiary prevention: action taken to reduce the chronic effects of a health problem in an individual or a population by minimising the functional impairment consequent to the acute or chronic health problem (for example, prevent complications) diabetes). Includes rehabilitation.

    • Quaternary prevention: action taken to identify patient at risk of overmedicalisation, to protect them from new medical invasion, and to suggest to them interventions, which are ethically acceptable.52

    Patient has no acute problems, no record on a disease register, no chronic problems, no minor problems or symptoms, AND ≥1 problem the patient presents with is classified as prevention.
    Process of care (synonym: procedure)
    In medical care, constitutes the actions undertaken by a physician.52
    Patient has no acute problems, no record on a disease register, no chronic problems, no minor symptoms or problems, and no prevention problems, AND ≥1 problem the patient presents with is classified as a process of care.
    • View popup
    Table 1. Listing of presenting condition classification and disease register combinations forming patients’ case-mix classification
    Patient case-mix classificationCondition categoryDisease registerTotal, nGP, nPA, nChange in hierarchy from condition category or categories to patient-level classification
    AcuteAcuteNo311912No
    AcuteYes271710
    Acute + chronicNo101
    Acute + chronicYes321
    Acute + chronic + minorNo000
    Acute + chronic + minorYes532
    Acute + minorNo1394
    Acute + minorYes15114
    Subtotal acute956134
    ChronicChronicNo23149No
    ChronicYes69627
    Chronic + minorNo19109
    Chronic + minorYes564313
    Chronic + processYes110
    Chronic + minor + processYes220
    MinorYes608355253Yes (n = 639)
    Minor + processYes949
    PreventionYes330
    ProcessYes19109
    Subtotal chronic809
    MinorMinorNo1146571575No
    Minor + processNo1459
    Minor + preventionNo303
    Subtotal minor1165
    PreventionPreventionNo431No
    ProcessProcessNo1376No
    • View popup
    Table 2. Crude, CMCS-adjusted, other variable-adjusted and CMCS and other variable-adjusted odds ratios or rate ratios of process and outcome measure differences between PAs and GPs 24
    Process or outcome measure 
    (as defined elsewhere24)
    Crude/univariate finding OR or RR (95% CI)
    GP (reference group)PAOR or RRUnadjustedAdjusted for CMCS onlyAdjusted for other variables of relevancea, but not CMCSFully adjusted: CMCS and other variables of relevance
    Processes% cases
    General advice22.951.4OR3.56 (2.58 to 4.29)3.58 (1.82 to 7.01)3.30 (1.68 to 6.47)3.30 (1.69 to 6.46)
    Advice on medication management12.617.1OR1.43 (1.12 to 1.82) b 1.62 (1.05 to 2.49)1.72 (1.08 to 2.72)
    Advice on over the counter medication9.520.5OR2.45 (1.92 to 3.18)  b 6.63 (0.56 to 4.69)1.74 (0.62 to 4.89)
    Mean per case
    Number of diagnostic tests0.340.36RR1.06 (0.82 to 1.38)1.11 (0.86 to 1.43)1.07 (0.90 to 1.29)1.08 (0.89 to 1.30)
    Number of referrals0.110.9RR0.84 (0.57 to 1.22)
     b
    0.94 (0.63 to 1.41)0.95 (0.63 to 1.43)
    Number of prescriptions0.780.89RR1.18 (0.86 to 1.58)1.17 (0.88 to 1.55)1.16 (0.86 to 1.56)1.16 (0.87 to 1.53)
    Number of procedures0.10.1RR0.76 (0.32 to 1.84)
     c

    c

    c
    Outcome
    Reconsultation for the same or a
    linked problem at the practice or urgent care facility within 14 days of the index consultation
    0.290.32RR1.03 (0.75 to 1.43)1.09 (0.77 to 1.54)1.12 (0.81 to 1.54)1.25 (0.91 to 1.72)
    • aWith an independent association with outcome (see full report for detail).24 bCould not be estimated in SPSS. cNumbers too small for further adjustment. CMCS = case-mix classification system. OR = odds ratio. RR = risk ratio.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 2, Issue 1
April 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Capturing complexity in clinician case-mix: classification system development using GP and physician associate data
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Capturing complexity in clinician case-mix: classification system development using GP and physician associate data
Mary Halter, Louise Joly, Simon de Lusignan, Robert L Grant, Heather Gage, Vari M Drennan
BJGP Open 2018; 2 (1): bjgpopen18X101277. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101277

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Capturing complexity in clinician case-mix: classification system development using GP and physician associate data
Mary Halter, Louise Joly, Simon de Lusignan, Robert L Grant, Heather Gage, Vari M Drennan
BJGP Open 2018; 2 (1): bjgpopen18X101277. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101277
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • classification
  • methods
  • case-mix
  • General Practice
  • physician assistants
  • physician associate

More in this TOC Section

  • Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and treatment intensity in secondary prevention of patients with ischaemic heart disease in the primary care setting: a real-world data registry study
  • General practitioner characteristics and video use in out-of-hours primary care: a register-based study
  • The impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on primary care contact among vulnerable populations in England: a controlled interrupted time series study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795