Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Composition of general practices in Western countries and associations with their perceived ability to manage patients with chronic conditions: a secondary analysis of survey data

Adeline Cachou de Camaret, Pascal Wild, Nicolas Senn and Christine Cohidon
BJGP Open 2026; 10 (1): BJGPO.2024.0200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0200
Adeline Cachou de Camaret
1 Department of Family Medicine, Centre of Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: adeline.decamaret{at}gmail.com
Pascal Wild
2 PW Statistical Consulting, Laxou, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicolas Senn
1 Department of Family Medicine, Centre of Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Cohidon
1 Department of Family Medicine, Centre of Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Characterisation of types of primary care team (PCT) according to their compositions of different healthcare professionals (in addition to GPs) (N = 13 200). Overall proportions of types of PCTs: traditional, 51.6%; multidisciplinary, 11.9%; nurse-centred, 11.9%; psychologist-centred, 18.7%; and physiotherapist-centred, 5.3%.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Characterisation of types of primary care team (PCT) according to their compositions of different healthcare professionals (in addition to GPs) (N = 13 200). Overall proportions of types of PCTs: traditional, 51.6%; multidisciplinary, 11.9%; nurse-centred, 11.9%; psychologist-centred, 18.7%; and physiotherapist-centred, 5.3%.
  • Types of primary care team by country (weighted data)
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. Types of primary care team by country (weighted data)

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Responders’ general sociodemographic characteristics and practice compositions in the 11 countries included in the 2019 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians (weighted data)
    CategoryAustraliaCanadaFranceGermanyNetherlandsNew ZealandNorwaySwedenSwitzerlandUKUSTotal (n) and average (%)
    Participants, n 50025691287809788503661241110951001157613 200
    Response rate, % 14.539.320.014.748.716.233.842.242.826.821.229.1
    Sex, %
    Male54.954.062.554.647.744.956.248.859.453.955.153.9
    Female45.145.937.545.352.255.043.751.140.546.044.846.0
    Age, years, %
    ≤4439.034.219.21.740.832.346.839.620.357.530.834.0
    45–6446.850.362.766.556.955.544.247.462.236.251.352.2
    ≥6514.215.317.916.72.112.18.812.917.46.217.713.7
    Percentage of practices including
    Nurses90.868.250.023.735.299.150.298.620.999.572.064.4
    Advanced practice nurses16.236.902.913.635.412.693.75.263.461.131.0
    Medical assistants3.211.7097.596.114.397.625.690.812.838.644.4
    Nutritionists53.245.021.216.731.516.36.158.018.316.634.228.8
    Pharmacists32.952.101.725.651.36.319.32.873.135.027.3
    Psychologists57.843.331.06.494.936.316.596.315.331.535.842.3
    Physiotherapists44.328.537.14.721.031.222.276.311.426.125.729.9
    Social workers7.944.215.70.98.617.17.902.317.239.614.7
    • View popup
    Table 2. Logistic regression of poor coordination with social services or other community providers as a function of physician and practice characteristics (N = 11 337)
    Univariate modelMultivariate model 1aMultivariate model 2b
    Category n OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
    Sex
    Male (reference)70721.00——1.00——1.00——
    Female59481.030.92 to 1.150.6020.950.83 to 1.080.4490.950.83 to 1.090.455
    Age, years
    ≤44 (reference)43761.00 ——1.00 ——1.00 ——
    45–5431510.910.78 to 1.050.2060.950.80 to 1.120.5391.020.86 to 1.210.819
    55–6438150.930.81 to 1.070.3091.000.85 to 1.170.9901.040.88 to 1.230.627
    ≥6516911.110.94 to 1.320.2140.910.74 to 1.130.4050.950.76 to 1.180.650
    Area
    City (reference)55901.00 ——1.00 ——1.00 ——
    Suburb26760.990.86 to 1.130.9020.970.83 to 1.140.7121.010.85 to 1.190.902
    Small town27610.620.53 to 0.72<0.0010.690.58 to 0.82<0.0010.820.68 to 0.980.033
    Rural17880.430.35 to 0.53<0.0010.530.42 to 0.67<0.0010.690.54 to 0.880.002
    Communication with other HCPs
    Yes, often (reference)81251.00 ——1.00 ——1.00 ——
    Sometimes or rarely38191.701.51 to 1.93<0.0011.801.58 to 2.05<0.0012.001.75 to 2.30<0.001
    Never1265.033.42 to 7.40<0.0014.783.16 to 7.23<0.0015.603.63 to 8.64<0.001
    GP communicates using email
    No (reference)46771.00 ——1.00 ——1.00 ——
    Yes80260.950.85 to 1.070.3920.800.70 to 0.920.0020.730.62 to 0.87<0.001
    Mean consultation time
    ≥5 minutes to ≤10 minutes (reference)27051.00 ——1.00 ——1.00 ——
    >10 minutes to ≤15 minutes42431.321.11 to 1.580.0011.491.21 to 1.82<0.0011.050.83 to 1.320.696
    >15 minutes to ≤20 minutes32901.751.47 to 2.09<0.0011.971.60 to 2.42<0.0011.000.77 to 1.300.986
    >20 minutes to ≤90 minutes26352.181.83 to 2.61<0.0012.381.91 to 2.95<0.0011.040.79 to 1.380.776
    Practice type
    Traditional type (reference)67211.00 ——1.00 ——1.00 ——
    Multidisciplinary16410.500.39 to 0.62<0.0010.420.31 to 0.55<0.0010.390.29 to 0.53<0.001
    Nurse-centred15431.651.41 to 1.93<0.0011.621.34 to 1.95<0.0011.110.91 to 1.370.298
    Psychologist-centred24271.541.35 to 1.77<0.0011.571.34 to 1.84<0.0010.880.74 to 1.050.173
    Physiotherapist-centred6880.950.73 to 1.230.6981.000.74 to 1.350.9880.840.62 to 1.230.251
    Country
    Australia (reference)  1.00 —— — ——1.00 ——
    Canada 1.410.99 to 1.990.054 — ——2.011.30 to 3.110.002
    France 2.151.51 to 3.07<0.001 — ——3.772.44 to 5.82<0.001
    Germany 0.340.20 to 0.50<0.001 — ——0.280.13 to 0.600.001
    The Netherlands 0.980.65 to 1.490.933 — ——2.151.30 to 3.570.001
    New Zealand 0.420.24 to 0.750.003 — ——0.510.26 to 1.000.052
    Norway 0.410.24 to 0.700.001 — ——0.850.46 to 1.590.615
    Sweden 3.042.17 to 4.26<0.001 — ——5.583.53 to 8.82<0.001
    Switzerland 0.730.48 to 1.100.130 — ——0.710.41 to 1.240.230
    UK0.510.33 to 0.800.003———0.890.52 to 1.520.672
    US1.891.33 to 2.60<0.001 — ——2.741.73 to 4.33<0.001
    • aWithout adjusting for countries. bAdjusting for individual countries. HCP = healthcare professional. OR = odds ratio.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Logistic regression of poor practices’ perceived ability to deal with patients with chronic conditions as a function of physician and practice characteristics (N = 11 376)
    Univariate modelMultivariate model 1aMultivariate model 2b
    Category n OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
    Sex
    Male (reference)70571.00——1.00——1.00——
    Female59461.181.08 to 1.29<0.0011.121.01 to 1.240.0271.151.03 to 1.280.013
    Age, years
    ≤44 (reference)43621.00——1.00——1.00——
    45–5431520.810.72 to 0.910.0070.840.74 to 0.960.0100.980.85 to 1.120.740
    55–6438070.860.77 to 0.960.0070.900.80 to 1.020.1140.940.83 to 1.080.417
    ≥6516940.950.83 to 1.100.5110.910.77 to 1.070.2441.000.84 to 1.190.980
    Area
    City (reference)55851.00——1.00——1.00——
    Suburb26761.000.89 to 1.120.9641.030.90 to 1.160.6800.870.76 to 1.000.053
    Small town27600.680.60 to 0.77<0.0010.780.68 to 0.90<0.0010.950.82 to 1.100.500
    Rural17830.750.65 to 0.87<0.0010.870.74 to 1.010.0710.930.78 to 1.100.398
    Communication with other HCPs
    Yes, often (reference)81601.00——1.00——1.00——
    Sometimes or rarely38341.581.43 to 1.74<0.0011.621.46 to 1.80<0.0011.951.74 to 2.18<0.001
    Never1252.261.53 to 3.33<0.0011.911.26 to 2.920.0022.871.86 to 4.44<0.001
    GP communicates using email
    No (reference)46601.00——1.00——1.00——
    Yes80240.890.81 to 0.970.0100.790.71 to 0.87<0.0010.870.76 to 0.990.036
    Mean consultation time
    ≤5 minutes to ≤10 minutes (reference)27031.00——1.00——1.00——
    >10 minutes to ≤15 minutes42411.731.50 to 2.00<0.0011.751.50 to 2.04<0.0011.040.86 to 1.270.662
    >15 minutes to ≤20 minutes32902.281.97 to 2.63<0.0012.372.02 to 2.78<0.0010.980.78 to 1.220.838
    >20 minutes to ≤90 minutes26282.231.92 to 2.59<0.0012.181.84 to 2.59<0.0011.050.83 to 1.330.671
    Practice type
    Traditional (reference)11541.00——1.00——1.00——
    Multidisciplinary2390.830.71 to 0.960.0140.700.59 to 0.84<0.0010.990.81 to 1.210.930
    Nurse-centred2440.900.77 to 1.050.1790.820.69 to 0.970.0230.910.75 to 1.100.320
    Psychologist-centred5911.541.38 to 1.72<0.0011.541.36 to 1.75<0.0011.140.98 to 1.320.090
    Physiotherapist-centred1821.721.44 to 2.06<0.0011.811.49 to 2.20<0.0011.341.08 to 1.670.009
    Country
    Australia (reference)1.00—————1.00——
    Canada2.101.51 to 2.91<0.001———2.181.47 to 3.22<0.001
    France11.057.96 to 15.35<0.001———15.7410.67 to 23.22<0.001
    Germany0.170.09 to 0.32<0.001———0.180.08 to 0.39<0.001
    The Netherlands0.450.28 to 0.710.001———0.640.38 to 1.090.098
    New Zealand1.340.89 to 2.030.160———1.580.99 to 2.520.056
    Norway1.290.87 to 1.920.200———2.041.29 to 3.250.002
    Sweden3.362.43 to 4.65<0.001———4.673.10 to 7.04<0.001
    Switzerland1.461.02 to 2.090.039———1.490.96 to 2.310.074
    UK2.171.53 to 3.07<0.001———2.851.86 to 4.37<0.001
    US1.651.18 to 2.330.004———1.831.20 to 2.800.005
    • aWithout adjusting for countries. bAdjusting for individual countries. HCP = healthcare professional. OR = odds ratio.

Supplementary Data

  • CdC_10.3399BJGPO.2024.0200_supp_v2.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 10, Issue 1
April 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Composition of general practices in Western countries and associations with their perceived ability to manage patients with chronic conditions: a secondary analysis of survey data
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Composition of general practices in Western countries and associations with their perceived ability to manage patients with chronic conditions: a secondary analysis of survey data
Adeline Cachou de Camaret, Pascal Wild, Nicolas Senn, Christine Cohidon
BJGP Open 2026; 10 (1): BJGPO.2024.0200. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0200

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Composition of general practices in Western countries and associations with their perceived ability to manage patients with chronic conditions: a secondary analysis of survey data
Adeline Cachou de Camaret, Pascal Wild, Nicolas Senn, Christine Cohidon
BJGP Open 2026; 10 (1): BJGPO.2024.0200. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0200
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • LinkedIn logo LinkedIn
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
  • Bluesky logo Bluesky

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • primary care team
  • chronic disease
  • model of care
  • Primary Health Care
  • quality of health care
  • delivery of health care

More in this TOC Section

  • The national early warning score during unscheduled home visits: retrospective cohort study
  • Domestic abuse survivors accessing support during perimenopause: a qualitative study with women
  • Cultural models within general practice training: a scoping review
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795