Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • CONFERENCE
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
BJGP Open
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • CONFERENCE
Research

The role of spoken language in cardiovascular health inequalities: a cross-sectional study of people with non-English language preference

Alex Mackay, Mark Ashworth and Patrick White
BJGP Open 2018; 1 (4): bjgpopen17X101241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X101241
Alex Mackay
1 Academic Fellow, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Campus, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Ashworth
2 Reader in Primary Care, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Campus, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mark.ashworth@kcl.ac.uk
Patrick White
3 Reader in Primary Care, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Campus, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Demographic characteristics compared between English language preference and other language preference groups using means (t-tests) and sex proportions (χ2).
    Language preferenceMean age, years (SD)Males, %Mean IMD score (SD)Ethnic groups, % (two most frequent and ‘Not recorded’)Country of birth, % (UK, most frequent, and ‘Not recorded’)
    English
    n = 161 938
    41.4 (16.0)47.930.1 (8.4)British or mixed British, 44.8;
    Other white, 17.0;
    Not recorded, 16.5
    UK, 47.1;
    Jamaica, 4.1;
    Not recorded, 22.6
    Non-English
    n = 47 790 
    38.9 (13.5)a 48.2a 32.1 (8.4)a Other white, 47.3;
    African, 13.9;
    Not recorded, 22.5
    UK, 1;
    Portugal, 9.5;
    Poland, 7.5;
    Not recorded, 21.4
    Portuguese
    n = 9862
    38.9 (12.7)a 49.3a 33 (7.5)a Other white, 66.6;
    Other, 8.2;
    Not recorded, 11.3
    UK, 0.5;
    Portugal, 46.4;
    Brazil, 24.5;
    Not recorded, 19.6
    Spanish
    n = 7882
    38.8 (12.3)a 47.2a 33.2 (7.9)a Other white, 50.1;
    Other, 26.5;
    Not recorded, 14.0
    UK, 0.7;
    Colombia, 23.4; Spain, 20.7;
    Not recorded, 18.9
    French
    n = 4968
    36.5 (11.0)a 48.5a 32.1 (8.3)a African, 37.8;
    Other white, 36.0;
    Not recorded, 13.5
    UK, 0.8;
    France, 39.9;
    Ivory Coast, 11.7;
    Not recorded, 21.1
    Polish
    n = 4311
    35.6 (11.1)a 45.0a 31 (7.9)a Other white, 90.3;
    British or mixed British, 5.7;
    Not recorded, 2.2
    UK, 0.2;
    Poland, 81.9; Portugal, 0.3;
    Not recorded, 17.0
    Somali
    n = 1567
    39.3 (13.6)a 43.7a 34.6 (7.8)a African, 75.9;
    Other black, 16.5;
    Not recorded, 20.9
    UK, 0.5;
    Somalia, 73.1;
    Not recorded, 25
    Other 
    n
    = 19 380
    40.3 (14.9)a 49.2a 31.3 (7.9)a Other white, 33.7;
    African, 15.5;
    Not recorded, 38.6
    UK, 1.7;
    Italy, 9.9;
    Pakistan, 4.4;
    Not recorded, 24.1
    Not recorded
    n
    = 92 676
    42.2 (14.9)a 58.4a 30.8 (8.7)a Unknown, 50.3;
    British or mixed British, 13.6;
    Not recorded, 13.4
    UK, 1.5;
    Ghana, 0.7;
    Not recorded, 90.9
    • a P <0.01 in comparison with English language preference groups. 

    • IMD = Index of Multiple Deprivation, 2010. Not recorded = no data were received for patients in this category. SD = standard deviation. 

    • View popup
    Table 2. Association between cardiovascular diagnosis and language preference (adjusteda ORs with 95% Cs).
    HypertensionCHDDMStroke
    OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
    English  n = 161 9381111
    Non-English  n = 47 7900.98 (0.92 to 1.03)1.18 (1.03 to 1.34)b 1.33 (1.23 to 1.43)c 0.94 (0.8 to 1.11)
    Portuguese n = 98621.43 (1.30 to 1.57)c 1.29 (0.99 to 1.68)1.74 (1.50 to 2.02)c 1.40 (1.08 to 1.81)b
    Spanish  n = 78820.83 (0.73 to 0.95)c 0.8 (0.58 to 1.10) 1.12 (0.91 to 1.38)0.86 (0.63 to 1.20)
    French  n = 49680.81 (0.70 to 0.95)b 0.65 (0.40 to 1.06)0.83 (0.65 to 1.04)0.68 (0.40 to 1.15)
    Polish  n = 43111.33 (1.04 to 1.72)b 1.23 (0.89 to 1.71)0.75 (0.57 to 0.99)b 0.77 (0.44 to 1.36)
    Somali  n = 15670.40 (0.32 to 0.50)c 1.4 (0.67 to 2.86)1.63 (1.34 to 1.98)c 0.87 (0.47 to 1.60)
    Other  n = 19 3800.92 (0.84 to 1.01)1.34 (1.07 to 1.67)c 1.42 (1.25 to 1.60)c 0.84 (0.69 to 1.03)
    Not recorded n = 92 6760.98 (0.94 to 1.03)1.07 (0.97to 1.17)1.15 (1.08 to 1.22)c 1.12 (1.00 to 1.25)b
    • aMultiple logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, ethnicity, and practice clustering. b P<0.05. c P<0.01. CHD = coronary heart disease. DM = diabetes mellitus. OR= odds ratio.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Association between cardiovascular risk factors at the most recent measurement and language preferences (adjusteda ORs with 95% CIs).
    Obesity 
    OR (95% CI)
    BP >150/90 mmHg
    OR (95% CI)
    HBA1c >48 mmol/mol 
    OR (95% CI)
    Total cholesterol >5 mmol/l
    OR (95% CI)
    Current smoker, yes or no
    OR (95% CI)
    English 1
    n = 134 639
    1
    n
    = 135 220
    1
    n
    = 10 545
    1
    n
    = 7349
    1
    n
    = 157 841
    Non-English 1.08 (1.04 to 1.13)c
    n
    = 38 755
    0.93 (0.88 to 0.99)b
    n
    = 38 196
    0.94 (0.76 to 1.15)
    n
    = 2958
    1.02 (0.83 to 1.24)
    n
    = 2194
    1.18 (1.14 to 1.21)c
    n
    = 46 404
    Portuguese 1.53 (1.36 to 1.73)c
    n
    = 7785
    1.12 (0.95 to 1.29)
    n
    = 7841
    1.13 (0.88 to 1.45)
    n
    = 575
    0.89 (0.59 to 1.33)
    n
    = 214
    1.13 (1.02 to 1.25)b
    n = 9360
    Spanish 1.21 (1.09 to 1.34)c
    n = 6304
    0.65 (0.55 to 0.77)c
    n = 6146
    0.93 (0.65 to 1.31)
    n
    = 416
    1.30 (0.90 to 1.90)
    n
    = 216
    0.79 (0.7 to 0.88)c
    n = 7626
    French 0.75 (0.69 to 0.82)c
    n = 4007
    0.78 (0.66 to 0.93)c
    n = 3887
    0.73 (0.51 to 1.02)
    n
    = 225
    0.65 (0.39 to 1.08)
    n
    = 132
    1.43 (1.3 to 1.57)c
    n = 4802
    Polish 1.03 (0.84 to 1.26)
    n
    = 3392
    1.72 (1.46 to 2.01)c
    n = 3168
    0.90 (0.50 to 1.63)
    n
    = 98
    0.51 (0.24 to 1.08)
    n
    = 86
    1.38 (1.25 to 1.52)c
    n = 4194
    Somali 1.12 (0.95 to 1.31)
    n
    = 1256
    0.61 (0.50 to 0.73)c
    n = 1371
    1.09 (0.75 to 1.60)
    n = 135
    1.8 (0.81 to 3.98)
    n
    = 60
    1.34 (1.05 to 1.70)b
    n = 1528
    Other 0.91 (0.85 to 0.98)c
    n = 16 011
    0.86 (0.77 to 0.95)c
    n = 15 783
    1.08 (0.86 to 1.35)
    n
    = 1509
    1.05 (0.77 to 1.43)
    n
    = 1516
    1.31 (1.22 to 1.40)c
    n = 18 894
    Not recorded 1.14 (1.10 to 1.18)c
    n = 62 116
    1.05 (1.00 to 1.10)b
    n = 68 872
    1.13 (0.97 to 1.32)
    n
    = 4944
    0.99 (0.86 to 1.14)
    n
    = 3534
    1.28 (1.24 to 1.31)c
    n = 80 066
    • aMultiple logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, ethnicity and practice clustering. *b P<0.05. c P<0.01.

    • BP = blood pressure. HbA1c = glycated haemoglobin. OR = odds ratio. 

    • View popup
    Table 4. Association between cardiovascular monitoring recorded within a set interval and language preference (adjusteda ORs with 95% confidence intervals).
    Smoking cessation history recorded
    within 15 months, 
    OR (95% CI)
    BP recorded
    within 9 months, 
    OR (95% CI)
    Cholesterol recorded
    within 15 months, 
    OR (95% CI)
    HbA1c recorded
    within 15 months, 
    OR (95% CI)
    English
    n
    = 161 938
    1
    n
    = 60 046
    1
    n
    = 135 228
    1
    n
    = 7467
    1
    n
    = 151 101
    Non-English
    n
    = 47 790
    1.06 (1.01 to 1.11)b
    n
    = 16 707
    0.98 (0.95 to 1.02)
    n
    = 38 199
    1.02 (0.88 to 1.19)
    n
    = 2207
    1.09 (0.93 to 1.28)
    n
    = 3047
    Portuguese
    n = 9862
    1.24 (0.96 to 1.59)
    n
    = 3844
    1.17 (0.97 to 1.4)
    n = 7841
    1.17 (0.8 to 1.71)
    n
    = 215
    1.43 (0.91 to 2.24)
    n
    = 581
    Spanish
    n = 7882
    1.03 (0.83 to 1.28)
    n
    = 2713
    0.93 (0.84 to 1.02)
    n
    = 6147
    1.38 (0.89 to 2.13)
    n
    = 220
    0.95 (0.66 to 1.36)
    n
    = 419
    French
    n = 4968
    0.87 (0.76 to 0.99)b
    n
    = 1688
    0.73 (0.67 to 0.8)c
    n
    = 3887
    0.87 (0.62 to 1.22)
    n
    = 133
    0.92 (0.62 to 1.37)
    n
    = 232
    Polish
    n = 4311
    1.12 (0.76 to 1.65)
    n
    = 1701
    0.94 (0.79 to 1.13)
    n
    = 3168
    1.2 (0.66 to 2.18)
    n
    = 56
    1.17 (0.56 to 2.47)
    n
    = 98
    Somali
    n = 1567
    1.14 (0.8 to 1.61)
    n
    = 443
    0.95 (0.8 to 1.1)
    n
    = 1371
    0.68 (0.38 to 1.22)
    n
    = 60
    1.01 (0.65 to 1.57)
    n
    = 139
    Other
    n = 19 380
    0.98 (0.84 to 1.16)
    n
    = 6318
    0.99 (0.91 to 1.08)
    n
    = 15 785
    0.92 (0.73 to 1.17)
    n
    = 1523
    1.03 (0.84 to 1.26)
    n
    = 1578
    Not recorded
    n
    = 92 676
    1.06 (1.02 to 1.11)c
    n
    = 30 372
    0.86 (0.84 to 0.89)c
    n
    = 68 876
    1.29 (1.16 to 1.42)c
    n
    = 3584
    0.98 (0.87 to 1.11)
    n
    = 5094
    • aMultiple logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, ethnicity and practice clustering. b P<0.05. c P<0.01. BP = blood pressure. OR = odds ratio.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 1, Issue 4
January 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The role of spoken language in cardiovascular health inequalities: a cross-sectional study of people with non-English language preference
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The role of spoken language in cardiovascular health inequalities: a cross-sectional study of people with non-English language preference
Alex Mackay, Mark Ashworth, Patrick White
BJGP Open 2018; 1 (4): bjgpopen17X101241. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X101241

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The role of spoken language in cardiovascular health inequalities: a cross-sectional study of people with non-English language preference
Alex Mackay, Mark Ashworth, Patrick White
BJGP Open 2018; 1 (4): bjgpopen17X101241. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X101241
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cardiovascular health inequalities
  • ethnicity
  • language preference

More in this TOC Section

  • Incorporating FRAX® into a nurse-delivered integrated care review: a multi-method qualitative study
  • Joint and soft tissue injections in Irish primary care: a survey of general practitioners’ attitudes and practices
  • Pattern of oral anticoagulants prescribing for atrial fibrillation in general practice: a study based on routine practice data from general practices in the Netherlands
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2023 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795