Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Outreach
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • Feedback
    • Alerts
    • Conference
    • eLetters
    • Audio abstracts
    • Past research calls
  • RESEARCH CALL: TELEHEALTH
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Advertisement
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Outreach
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • Feedback
    • Alerts
    • Conference
    • eLetters
    • Audio abstracts
    • Past research calls
  • RESEARCH CALL: TELEHEALTH
Practice & Policy

Quality circles to identify barriers, facilitating factors, and solutions for high-quality primary care for asylum seekers

Cornelia Straßner, Sandra Claudia Gewalt, Peta Becker von Rose, Detlef Lorenzen, Joachim Szecsenyi and Kayvan Bozorgmehr
BJGP Open 2017; 1 (3): bjgpopen17X101133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X101133
Cornelia Straßner
1 GP & Researcher, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, , Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cornelia.strassner@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Sandra Claudia Gewalt
2 Researcher, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, , Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peta Becker von Rose
3 GP, Werkstatt Gesundheit e.V, , Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Detlef Lorenzen
3 GP, Werkstatt Gesundheit e.V, , Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joachim Szecsenyi
4 GP & Head of Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, , Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kayvan Bozorgmehr
5 Senior Researcher, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, , Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
  • quality circle
  • asylum seeker
  • primary care
  • reception centre

Background

In 2015 Germany received more than 476 600 asylum applications.1 Incoming asylum seekers are accommodated in reception centres (RCs) for up to 6 months before they are dispersed to other federal states or districts. Due to the high immigration since the end of 2014, many federal states established new RCs to expand their capacities in hosting asylum seekers. Baden Württemberg, for example, one of the largest federal states receiving about 13% of incoming asylum seekers, expanded its capacity from one RC up until 2014 to five RCs thereafter. Since there are no nationwide standards in place, healthcare provision in RCs is highly heterogeneously organised and fragmented.2 In Heidelberg, former barracks of the US army were reorganised as an RC in August 2015 and hosted about 6500 asylum seekers. The concentration of asylum seekers in the RC, linked with insufficient provision of primary health care, led to an unmanageable number of consultations in emergency departments of nearby hospitals. Asylum seekers have specific healthcare needs due to exposure to pre-, peri-, and postmigration health risks. These include traumatic events,3 endemic infectious diseases in the countries of origin or transit,4 and chronic conditions which may have been exacerbated during the migration process. They are also at higher risk of developing psychological distress5 and acquiring infectious diseases in the host country due to mass accommodation.6

To address both the shortcomings in primary care provision and the special needs, a walk-in clinic jointly led by the university hospital, the public health services, and the local physicians’ association was established in the RC with funds from the state government and the university hospital. The clinic provides general medicine as well as gynecological, paediatric, and psychiatric and psychosomatic health care.

The aim of this article is to report challenges and solutions of establishing high-quality primary health care for asylum seekers and meeting their specific needs in the particular setting of a large RC.

Although other countries may not have similar RCs, the situation may change as the contemporary migration flows are very dynamic. Thus, this report may be useful for GPs to gain an insight into possible ways of managing these highly vulnerable people whose complex health needs often present a challenge in conventional healthcare settings.

Analysis of current care

After a negotiation and planning period of 8 months, medical services were initiated in February 2016. In July 2016 a group discussion among 24 healthcare professionals working in the clinic was organised to conduct a situation analysis and to identify barriers and solutions for the provision of high-quality care. Emerging issues could be assigned to 10 major themes (Box 1). The cooperation of different professions in the clinic was seen as advantage but due to a high turnover of staff assuring continuity of care was challenging. In this context, the need for improved documentation of medical data was raised. Medical treatment was perceived more difficult than usual due to high numbers of patients with special needs (for example, drug-addicted patients or patients with infectious diseases such as tuberculosis or hepatitis) and lack of country-specific diagnostic algorithms. A lack of resources , especially of assistants, interpreters, and medical supplies, affected the provision of care. Yet the general infrastructure of the clinic including the in-door-pharmacy was considered an advantage. Legal aspects were also mentioned as aggravating factors: The German Asylum Seekers Benefits Act limits the provision of care to acute and painful conditions, maternity care services, preventive medical checkups, vaccinations, and so called 'indispensable services'.7 This vague definition created uncertainties among providers about the scope of care provided in the clinic: acute and emergency care or continuous primary and specialised care. Thus, the scope of care provided was highly dependent on the personal attitude of the individual physician. However, the strong commitment of all staff who perceived their tasks as being meaningful was considered a facilitating factor.

ThemeBarriersFacilitatorsSolutions
Cooperation
  • Lack of exchange of relevant information between providers

  • Trustful interprofessional cooperation of university and local resident physicians in one clinic

  • Consequent use of a previously introduced paper-based patient health record11

Documentation
  • Loss of information due to insufficient documentation/poor readability

  • Dual documentation in two record systems (one of the university hospital, one of the local resident doctors)

  • Unclear how to archive medical and laboratory results

  • Availability of a previously introduced paper-based personal health record11

  • Clarification with the university hospital’s administration to only use one documentation software

  • Design of a pattern to standardise documentation in the software

  • Software training for resident physicians was performed

  • Installation of a software module to import laboratory results and training of staff how to use it

Medical treatment
  • Unclear how to handle patients with psychotropic dependency

  • Shortcomings in assuring follow-up visits and continuity of care

  • Lack of guidelines or standards for frequent reasons of consultation and infectious diseases

  • Lack of time to address psychosocial causes of symptoms

  • Interprofessional, interdisciplinary team

  • Composition of a detoxification contract in various languages that all patients with psychotropic dependency have to sign

  • Exchange with staff of advisory services for asylum seekers for social and legal issues during a quality circle meeting

  • Guideline for diagnostics of infectious diseases will be elaborated in cooperation with the Department of Tropical Medicine

Human resources
  • Lack of interpreters

  • Lack of support staff for medical and administrative tasks

  • Support by medical students

  • Employment of interpreters for frequent languages

  • Employment of nurses

Material resources
  • Lack of drug supplies and vaccinations

  • Shortage and lacking standardisation of necessary equipment

  • Lack of well-functioning soft- and hardware (such as record system and printers)

  • Existence of an in-house pharmacy

  • Adequate facility

  • Design of a checklist and implementation of a daily tour through the facility by a designated person to assure availability of equipment

Politics and legislation
  • Uncertainties among healthcare professionals about the scope of care covered by Asylum Seekers’ Benefits Act

  • Uncertainties related to issuing medical certificates with relevance for the asylum procedure

  • Invitation of an advocate specialised in asylum law is planned

Motivation/attitudes
  • Unclear self-concept of the walk-in clinic: emergency department versus primary care practice

  • Work is considered a meaningful task

  • Work is considered interesting because of wide range of cases

  • High level of commitment from all staff

Patient behaviour
  • High number of family members attending consultations

  • Cultural differences in communication and behaviour

  • Thankful patients

  • Workshop on cultural competence was offered

Healthcare providers’ behaviour
  • Lack of discretion (staff comes in without knocking)

  • Room divider was bought

Organisational processes
  • Registration: lack of triage mechanisms to identify patients with acute conditions

  • Registration: previous healthcare provision is not considered leading to redundancies in diagnostics and channeling to wrong specialisation

  • Emergency case is not complete

  • Checklist for content of emergency case and a responsible person for regular controls were defined

Box 1. Barriers, enablers and strategies for assuring high-quality care for asylum seekers in a German reception centre

Solutions to address barriers and facilitating factors

The findings of the situation analysis led to the joint agreement to introduce a quality circle (QC). QCs can be defined as autonomous peer groups of healthcare professionals who meet on a regular basis and aim at assessment and improvement of quality of care in their own practices.8 They are characterised by a result-oriented approach identifying quality problems and strategies to address these problems.9 QCs have become a globally recognised instrument for quality improvement in Europe8,9 and are partly even obligatory for GPs in South Germany.

Two measures were undertaken to support the implementation of a regular and effective QC for clinic staff: the participants themselves decided on the frequency, the course and content of the meetings (bottom-up approach). The QC was accredited and the participants received credits for their continuous medical education.

Four QC meetings were held so far in intervals of 6–8 weeks. Each took approximately 2 hours and was marked by vivid discussions. With, on average, 24 participants from different professions and disciplines participation was continuously high. Although we did not conduct a systematic evaluation of the QC, we monitored the target achievements as this is part of the QC concept. Several solutions have been elaborated and implemented so far (Box 1). Measures on an organisational level such as creating checklists for the equipment and standardising procedures were implemented successfully. Difficulties were faced when barriers on a legal, political, or national level had to be addressed; for example, to create guidelines for frequent reasons for counselling in accordance with national guidelines and the entitlements covered by the Asylum Seekers’ Benefits Act.

Discussion

When establishing healthcare services for asylum seekers many quality issues — partly similar, partly distinct from usual care — arise. Our experiences show that QCs, which have proved a suitable instrument for quality improvement in German primary care over years, are also helpful to foster quality improvements in special settings such as RCs for asylum seekers. However, structural barriers such as legal restrictions, financial limitations, or a lack of national clinical guidelines for the specific setting of RCs limit the full potential of QCs to improve care. Beside local initiatives national endeavours are necessary to assure high standards of health care for asylum seekers and to avoid harm, as the medical code of ethics demands. Health care for asylum seekers in Germany is currently characterised by an overwhelming heterogeneity due to decentralised organisation and responsibilities.1,10 We argue that measures to assure high quality standards should be enforced in healthcare services for asylum seekers just as in regular care. QCs may be an effective instrument for quality improvement beyond conventional audit approaches. We recommend to establish QCs in respective institutions.

Notes

Funding

Kayvan Bozorgmehr receives grants by the Federal Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF) in the scope of the research programme 'Strukturaufbau in der Versorgungsforschung' (grant number: FKZ 01GY1611). No funding was received for performing quality circles or writing this article.

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to all staff of the walk-in clinic and all collaborating departments for the continuous commitment and good cooperation.

Competing interests

CS: Cornelia Straßner and Joachim Szecsenyi moderated the quality circles.

JS: Cornelia Straßner and Joachim Szecsenyi moderated the quality circles.

The other authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  • Received February 23, 2017.
  • Accepted April 10, 2017.
  • Copyright © The Authors 2017

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Federal Office for Migration and Refugees
    Das Bundesamt in Zahlen 2015 Asyl, Migration und Integration, Germany. Federal Office for Migration and Refugees . https://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Publikationen/Broschueren/bundesamt-in-zahlen-2015.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. accessed 15 Aug 2017 .
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bozorgmehr K,
    2. Nöst S,
    3. Thaiss HM,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Health care provisions for asylum-seekers: a nationwide survey of public health authorities in Germany [in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 59(5):545–555, doi:10.1007/s00103-016-2329-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Reed RV,
    2. Fazel M,
    3. Jones L,
    4. et al.
    (2012) Mental health of displaced and refugee children resettled in low-income and middle-income countries: risk and protective factors. The Lancet 379(9812):250–265, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60050-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
    Infectious diseases of specific relevance to newly-arrived migrants in the EU/EEA – 19 November 2015. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control . http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/Infectious-diseases-of-specific-relevance-to-newly-arrived-migrants-in-EU-EEA.pdf. accessed 14 Aug 2017 .
  5. 5.↵
    1. Porter M,
    2. Haslam N
    (2005) Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons: a meta-analysis. JAMA 294(5):602–612, doi:10.1001/jama.294.5.602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kühne A,
    2. Gilsdorf A
    (2016) Infectious disease outbreaks in centralized homes for asylum seekers in Germany from 2004–2014 [in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 59(5):570–577, doi:10.1007/s00103-016-2332-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bozorgmehr K,
    2. Razum O
    (2015) Effect of restricting access to health care on health expenditures among asylum-seekers and refugees: a quasi-experimental study in Germany, 1994–2013. Plos One 10(7), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131483. e0131483.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Beyer M,
    2. Gerlach FM,
    3. Flies U,
    4. et al.
    (2003) The development of quality circles/peer review groups as a method of quality improvement in Europe. Results of a survey in 26 European countries. Fam Pract 20(4):443–451.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Munck A,
    2. Damsgaard J,
    3. Hansen DG,,
    4. et al.
    (2003) The Nordic method for quality improvement in general practice. Qual Prim Care 11:73–78.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wahedi K,
    2. Nöst S,
    3. Bozorgmehr K
    (2017) Health examination of asylum seekers: a nationwide analysis of state policies in Germany : § 62 of the asylum law [in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 60(1):1–10, doi:10.1007/s00103-016-2489-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. University Hospital Heidelberg
    A patient-held health-record for asylum-seekers in reception centres to improve continuity of care, Germany. University Hospital Heidelberg . http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13212716. accessed 15 Aug 2017 .
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 1, Issue 3
October 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quality circles to identify barriers, facilitating factors, and solutions for high-quality primary care for asylum seekers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Quality circles to identify barriers, facilitating factors, and solutions for high-quality primary care for asylum seekers
Cornelia Straßner, Sandra Claudia Gewalt, Peta Becker von Rose, Detlef Lorenzen, Joachim Szecsenyi, Kayvan Bozorgmehr
BJGP Open 2017; 1 (3): bjgpopen17X101133. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X101133

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Quality circles to identify barriers, facilitating factors, and solutions for high-quality primary care for asylum seekers
Cornelia Straßner, Sandra Claudia Gewalt, Peta Becker von Rose, Detlef Lorenzen, Joachim Szecsenyi, Kayvan Bozorgmehr
BJGP Open 2017; 1 (3): bjgpopen17X101133. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X101133
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Background
    • Analysis of current care
    • Solutions to address barriers and facilitating factors
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • quality circle
  • asylum seeker
  • primary care
  • reception centre

More in this TOC Section

  • Augmented Consulting: the future of primary care?
  • Communicating with people with hearing loss: COVID-19 and beyond
  • Improving the utility and sustainability of novel health technology to improve clinical outcomes for patients: an East Staffordshire experience of screening for atrial fibrillation with the AliveCor KardiaMobile
Show more Practice & Policy

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2021 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795