Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Practice & Policy

GP-confirmed complete Achilles tendon rupture using pocket-sized ultrasound: a case report

SJ Davis, A Lott and E Besada
BJGP Open 2017; 1 (3): bjgpopen17X100893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X100893
SJ Davis
1 GP & University Lecturer, Department of General Practice, Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, , Norway
MBChB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sdnibley@gmail.com
A Lott
2 Junior Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, , Norway
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E Besada
3 Rheumatologist & University Lecturer, Department of Rheumatology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø (UiT) The Arctic University of Norway, , Norway
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
  • ultrasound
  • general practitioner
  • GP
  • pocket
  • tendon

Introduction

The incidence of complete Achilles tendon rupture is 18 per 100 000 patient-years1 and is usually diagnosed clinically by GPs. The extent of clinical misdiagnosis is unknown in Norway, but may be high.2 This is important as delayed treatment has unfavourable consequences.1,3 We report how a GP, with no clinical ultrasound experience, recorded images with a pocket-sized ultrasound device (PSUD) under supervision to confirm a complete Achilles tendon rupture. This could present a new indication for GP ultrasound.

Case report

A 36-year-old man experienced acute pain above the right heel accompanied by an audible snap while sprinting. He immediately had difficulty walking and 3 hours later consulted an on-call GP. Posterior ankle swelling with a tender depression 3 cm proximal to the calcaneum was found. Active plantar flexion against resistance was weak and Simmonds–Thompson test was ‘partially positive’ on applying a strong calf-squeeze. Based on these findings, calf muscle rupture was diagnosed as the Achilles tendon was thought to be intact. The patient was advised to elevate the foot and wait 2 weeks for improvement. Two days later a second GP, who was aware of a history of an audible snap, considered complete tendon rupture and reexamined the patient. Findings included an absent right heel raise due to weakness, minimal active plantar flexion against gravity and lying prone, significant right ankle swelling without bruising, and an altered angle of declination. Palpation elicited no ankle bony tenderness, yet a painful gap was identified 6 cm proximal from the calcaneal attachment, along the line of the Achilles tendon. Simmonds–Thompson's test was clearly positive. The positive Simmond’s triad indicated a clinical diagnosis of complete rupture of the Achilles tendon.

A 3.4–8 MHz linear array probe PSUD (VScan™ dual probe, GE Healthcare), set at a depth of 3.5 cm, was used under the supervision of a rheumatologist experienced in ultrasound. The tendon was enlarged from 1 cm to 6 cm above the calcaneal insertion, where a clear gap was seen (Figure 1). Two hours later a radiologist-performed ultrasound (LOGIQ E9™, GE Healthcare) and reported an enlarged distal tendon and a complete rupture at 5–6 cm from the calcaneal attachment, creating a 2.7 cm blood-filled gap (Figure 2). Surgical exploration 8 days post-injury found a complete Achilles tendon rupture ‘5–10 cm above the ankle joint’.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1. Pocket-sized ultrasound sagittal view of the Achilles rupture.
Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2. Hospital ultrasound sagittal view of the Achilles rupture.

Discussion

Tromsø Hospital serves a large area with a population of approximately 160 000. Between 2010–2014 an average of 21 patients per year were referred by their GP for suspected Achilles rupture. Approximately one-third (8.2 patients per year) had a complete rupture confirmed by ultrasound. It is unknown how many patients were initially misdiagnosed and, although the numbers are few, this is important to investigate as any delayed diagnosis has serious consequences for patients undergoing either operative or non-operative treatment.1,3

Misdiagnosis rates have been reported to be as high as 22%2 despite the claim that clinical examination ‘done properly’ has a sensitivity close to 100%.4 Inadequate training5 and infrequent case exposure may be reasons for this. This case highlighted an incorrect interpretation that weak active plantar flexion excluded a complete tendon rupture. The action of deep flexor tendons was not appreciated as the reason why plantar flexion may be partially preserved. Although improved training should minimise such misinterpretation, we feel that ultrasound offers supportive visual evidence which adds value to the diagnostic process. Other benefits include reduced economic and time costs of transport, fewer orthopaedic reviews and radiologist ultrasound, and earlier access to local non-surgical treatment.

Hospital ultrasound has a positive predictive value for diagnosing complete Achilles ruptures of 100%.6,7 The value for PSUDs is unknown and possibly lower due to poorer imaging and operator technique and/or interpretation. The VScan did however answer the clinical question about complete rupture. Research should compare both devices on a larger scale for complete rupture and alternative pathologies, such as partial rupture.

Norwegian GPs already use ultrasound to assess urinary retention, fetal viability, deep venous thrombosis, gall stones, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and skin abscesses. These indications still apply despite no requirement for certified training in Norway. The evidence base for diagnostic accuracy and impact on clinical outcomes is weak,8,9 yet this should not deter primary care research. This new indication for PSUDs has already benefitted emergency medicine10 and could also save orthopaedic consultation time. The role of GP ultrasound should be to reduce misdiagnosis and provide a safer opportunity to develop generic ultrasound skills. We hope this report will stimulate research collaboration to assess the impact of GP ultrasound on measurable clinical end-points related to Achilles tendon injury.

Notes

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Patient consent

The patient consented to the publication of this article and the associated images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  • Received November 25, 2016.
  • Accepted December 8, 2016.
  • Copyright © The Authors 2017

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Leppilahti J,
    2. Puranen J,
    3. Orava S
    (1996) Incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Scand 67(3):277–279, doi:10.3109/17453679608994688.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Inglis AE,
    2. Scott WN,
    3. Sculco TP,
    4. et al.
    (1976) Ruptures of the tendo achillis. An objective assessment of surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 58(7):990–993, doi:10.2106/00004623-197658070-00015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Den Hartog BD
    (2008) Surgical strategies: delayed diagnosis or neglected achilles' tendon ruptures. Foot & Ankle Int 29(4):456–463, doi:10.3113/FAI.2008.0456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Singh D
    (2015) Acute Achilles tendon rupture. BMJ 351, doi:10.1136/bmj.h4722. h4722.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gravlee JR,
    2. Hatch RL,
    3. Galea AM
    (2000) Achilles tendon rupture: a challenging diagnosis. J Am Board Fam Prac 13(5):371–373.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gulati V,
    2. Jaggard M,
    3. Al-Nammari SS,
    4. et al.
    (2015) Management of achilles tendon injury: A current concepts systematic review. World J Orthop 6(4):380–386, doi:10.5312/wjo.v6.i4.380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hartgerink P,
    2. Fessell DP,
    3. Jacobson JA,
    4. et al.
    (2001) Full- versus partial-thickness Achilles tendon tears: sonographic accuracy and characterization in 26 cases with surgical correlation. Radiology 220(2):406–412, doi:10.1148/radiology.220.2.r01au41406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lærum F,
    2. Eik-Nes S,
    3. Fønnebø V,
    4. et al.
    Diagnostikk med ultralyd i primærhelsetjesten. http://www.kunnskapssenteret.no/publikasjoner/_attachment/172407?_ts=14855a790e3. accessed 10 Jul 2017 .
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wordsworth S,
    2. Scott A
    (2002) Ultrasound scanning by general practitioners: is it worthwhile? J Pub Heal 24(2):88–94, doi:10.1093/pubmed/24.2.88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Stickles SP,
    2. Friedman L,
    3. Demarest M,
    4. et al.
    (2015) Achilles tendon rupture. Western J Emer Med 16(1):161–162, doi:10.5811/westjem.2014.10.24127.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 1, Issue 3
October 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GP-confirmed complete Achilles tendon rupture using pocket-sized ultrasound: a case report
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
GP-confirmed complete Achilles tendon rupture using pocket-sized ultrasound: a case report
SJ Davis, A Lott, E Besada
BJGP Open 2017; 1 (3): bjgpopen17X100893. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100893

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
GP-confirmed complete Achilles tendon rupture using pocket-sized ultrasound: a case report
SJ Davis, A Lott, E Besada
BJGP Open 2017; 1 (3): bjgpopen17X100893. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100893
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Case report
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • ultrasound
  • General practitioner
  • GP
  • pocket
  • tendon

More in this TOC Section

  • Potentially inappropriate prescribing in middle-aged adults: a significant problem with a lack of action and evidence to address it
  • The BJGP Open Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of 2024: an editorial
  • The overlooked challenges facing out-of-hours primary care in the NHS: a missed opportunity in policy
Show more Practice & Policy

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795