Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

The specific needs of patients following sepsis: a nested qualitative interview study

Sabine Gehrke-Beck, Mareike Bänfer, Nina Schilling, Konrad Schmidt, Jochen Gensichen and Christoph Heintze
BJGP Open 2017; 1 (1): bjgpopen17X100725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X100725
Sabine Gehrke-Beck
1GP, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of General Practice, , Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sabine.gehrke-beck{at}charite.de
Mareike Bänfer
2Physician, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of General Practice, , Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nina Schilling
3Medical Student, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of General Practice, , Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Konrad Schmidt
4GP, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, , Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jochen Gensichen
5GP and Professor, Institute of General Practice, Medical Center of the University of Munich, , Germany
MSc, MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Heintze
6GP and Professor, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of General Practice, , Germany
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Box 1. Coding framework
    Patient perspective
    Patient education Information Written information as reference for arising questions
    Lack of interest
    Refusal of informationRecall of burdensome memories
    Education sessionNo recall of education
    Effect on health behaviour
    Monitoring Questioning Safety
    Personal attention
    Encourages personal reflection on health
    Inconvenient
    Recall of burdensome memories
    Care Helpful talking
    Practical help
    Lack of practical support and direct help
    Feedback of results Feedback not noticed
    Feedback noticed, not discussed with GP
    Results discussed with GP
    GP considered monitoring results irrelevant
    GPs’ perspective
    Patient education Not noticed
    Considered unnecessary
    Patient autonomy improves GP care
    Monitoring Effects on care Enhances patient wellbeing
    Additional medical information
    Unnecessary for uncomplicated patient
    Not time saving
    Delegation Personal patient contact necessary
    Time and money expenses
    Burden for patients
    Benefits of delegationAdditional perspective
    Additional home visit
    Active questioning
    Implementation of therapy No problemsProblems expectes in similar patients in different circumstances (location, insurance status)
    Financial strains
    Problems of avaibility
    Problems of transport
    • View popup
    Table 1. Participants characteristics
    PatientsGPs
    Total1913
    Male12
    Female7
    Mean age (range), years61 (42–84)54 (41–64)
    Mean time working in practice (range), years– (–)19 (9–33)
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 1, Issue 1
April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The specific needs of patients following sepsis: a nested qualitative interview study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The specific needs of patients following sepsis: a nested qualitative interview study
Sabine Gehrke-Beck, Mareike Bänfer, Nina Schilling, Konrad Schmidt, Jochen Gensichen, Christoph Heintze
BJGP Open 2017; 1 (1): bjgpopen17X100725. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100725

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The specific needs of patients following sepsis: a nested qualitative interview study
Sabine Gehrke-Beck, Mareike Bänfer, Nina Schilling, Konrad Schmidt, Jochen Gensichen, Christoph Heintze
BJGP Open 2017; 1 (1): bjgpopen17X100725. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100725
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • primary health care
  • aftercare
  • patient education as topic
  • sepsis
  • professional delegation
  • Qualitative research

More in this TOC Section

  • Continuing professional development on planetary health for African family physicians: descriptive survey
  • What does "housebound" mean? Mixed methods study to develop a consensus definition
  • Depictions of the GP crisis: thematic analysis of UK newspapers pre-general election
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795