Abstract
We explored the attitudes, opinions, and concerns of African American women regarding influenza vaccination during pregnancy. As influenza immunization coverage rates remain suboptimal in the United States among this population, we elicited message framing strategies for multicomponent interventions aimed at decreasing future incident cases of maternal and neonatal influenza. Semi-structured in-depth interviews (N = 21) were conducted with pregnant African American women at urban OB/GYN clinics who had not received an influenza vaccine. Interviews were transcribed, subjected to intercoder reliability assessment, and content analyzed to identify common thematic factors related to acceptance of the influenza vaccine and health communication message preferences. Four major themes were identified. These were communication approaches, normal vaccine behavior, pregnancy vaccination, and positive versus negative framing. Two strong themes emerged: positively-framed messages were preferred over negatively-framed messages and those emphasizing the health of the infant. Additionally, previous immunization, message source, and vaccine misperceptions also played important roles in decision-making. The majority of women indicated that positively framed messages focusing on the infant’s health would encourage them to receive an influenza vaccine. Messages emphasizing immunization benefits such as protection against preterm birth and low birth weight outcomes have potential to overcome widespread negative community perceptions and cultural beliefs. Additionally, messages transmitted via interpersonal networks and social media strongly influence motivation to obtain vaccination during pregnancy. The findings of this study will assist in developing tailored messages that change pregnant African American women’s influenza vaccination decision-making to achieve improved coverage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization. (2013). Review of the 2012–2013 winter influenza season, northern hemisphere. Weekly Epidemiological Record, 88(22), 225–232.
CDC. (2012–2013). Influenza season week 4 ending January 26, 2013. FluView 2013; http://www.cdc.gov.proxy.library.emory.edu/flu/weekly/index.htm—ISTE. Accessed February 3, 2013.
CDC. (2013). Influenza activity–United States, 2012–13 season and composition of the 2013–14 influenza vaccine. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 62(23), 473–479.
Thompson, W. W., Shay, D. K., Weintraub, E., et al. (2003). Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(2), 179–186.
Thompson, W. W., Shay, D. K., Weintraub, E., et al. (2004). Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(11), 1333–1340.
Ahluwalia, I. B., Jamieson, D. J., Rasmussen, S. A., D’Angelo, D., Goodman, D., & Kim, H. (2010). Correlates of seasonal influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women in Georgia and Rhode Island. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116(4), 949–955.
Creanga, A. A., Kamimoto, L., Newsome, K., et al. (2011). Seasonal and 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection during pregnancy: A population-based study of hospitalized cases. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 204(6 Suppl 1), S38–S45.
Beigi, R. H., Wiringa, A. E., Bailey, R. R., Assi, T. M., & Lee, B. Y. (2009). Economic value of seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 49(12), 1784–1792.
Moro, P. L., Tepper, N. K., Grohskopf, L. A., Vellozzi, C., & Broder, K. (2012). Safety of seasonal influenza and influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines in pregnancy. Expert Review of Vaccines, 11(8), 911–921.
SteelFisher, G. K., Blendon, R. J., Bekheit, M. M., & Lubell, K. (2010). The public’s response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. The New England journal of medicine, 362(22), e65.
Larson, H. J., & Heymann, D. L. (2010). Public health response to influenza A(H1N1) as an opportunity to build public trust. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(3), 271–272.
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 566. (2013). Update on immunization and pregnancy: Tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccination. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 121(6), 1411–1414.
Ahluwalia, I. B., Singleton, J. A., Jamieson, D. J., Rasmussen, S. A., & Harrison, L. (2011). Seasonal influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women: Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 20(5), 649–651.
Kharbanda, E. O., Vazquez-Benitez, G., Lipkind, H., Naleway, A., Lee, G., & Nordin, J. D. (2013). Inactivated influenza vaccine during pregnancy and risks for adverse obstetric events. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 122(3), 659–667.
Nordin, J. D., Kharbanda, E. O., Benitez, G. V., et al. (2013). Maternal safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 121(3), 519–525.
Tamma, P. D., Ault, K. A., del Rio, C., Steinhoff, M. C., Halsey, N. A., & Omer, S. B. (2009). Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201(6), 547–552.
Steinhoff, M. C., & Omer, S. B. (2012). A review of fetal and infant protection associated with antenatal influenza immunization. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 207(3 Suppl), S21–S27.
CDC. (2012). Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women—2011–12 influenza season, United States. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61, 758–763.
Marin, M. G., Johanson, W. G, Jr, & Salas-Lopez, D. (2002). Influenza vaccination among minority populations in the United States. Preventive Medicine, 34(2), 235–241.
Steelfisher, G. K., Blendon, R. J., Bekheit, M. M., et al. (2011). Novel pandemic A (H1N1) influenza vaccination among pregnant women: Motivators and barriers. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 204(6 Suppl 1), S116–S123.
Frew, P. M., Painter, J. E., Hixson, B., et al. (2012). Factors mediating seasonal and influenza A (H1N1) vaccine acceptance among ethnically diverse populations in the urban south. Vaccine, 30(28), 4200–4208.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
Satia, J. A., Barlow, J., Armstrong-Brown, J., & Watters, J. L. (2010). Qualitative study to explore prospect theory and message framing and diet and cancer prevention-related issues among African American adolescents. Cancer Nursing, 33(2), 102–109.
Abhyankar, P., O’Connor, D. B., & Lawton, R. (2008). The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: Evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 13(1), 1–16.
Bartels, R. D., Kelly, K. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2010). Moving beyond the function of the health behaviour: The effect of message frame on behavioural decision-making. Psychology and Health, 25(7), 821–838.
Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101–116.
Jung, M. E., Martin Ginis, K. A., Phillips, S. M., & Lordon, C. D. (2011). Increasing calcium intake in young women through gain-framed, targeted messages: A randomised controlled trial. Psychology and Health, 26(5), 531–547.
Gallagher, K. M., Updegraff, J. A., Rothman, A. J., & Sims, L. (2011). Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychology, 30(2), 145–152.
Hull, S. J. (2012). Perceived risk as a moderator of the effectiveness of framed HIV-test promotion messages among women: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology, 31(1), 114–121.
Kharbanda, E. O., Parker, E. D., Nordin, J. D., Hedblom, B. D., Rolnick, S. J. (2012). Influenza and pertussis vaccination coverage among privately insured women of reprodutive age. Maternal and Child Health Journal.
Glaser, B. G. (2002). Grounded theory and gender relevance. Health Care for Women International, 23(8), 786–793.
Guest, G., & MacQueen, K. M. (2008). Handbook for team-based qualitative research. Lanham: Altamira.
Carey, J. W., Morgan, M., & Oxtoby, M. J. (1996). Intercoder agreement in analysis of responses to open-ended interview questions: Examples from tuberculosis research. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 8(3), 1–5.
Fisher, B. M., Scott, J., Hart, J., Winn, V. D., Gibbs, R. S., & Lynch, A. M. (2011). Behaviors and perceptions regarding seasonal and H1N1 influenza vaccination during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 204(6 Suppl 1), S107–S111.
Blanchard-Rohner, G., Meier, S., Ryser, J. et al. (2012). Acceptability of maternal immunization against influenza: The critical role of obstetricians. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine.
Kharbanda, E. O., Vargas, C. Y., Castano, P. M., Lara, M., Andres, R., & Stockwell, M. S. (2011). Exploring pregnant women’s views on influenza vaccination and educational text messages. Preventive Medicine, 52(1), 75–77.
Marczinski, C. A. (2012). Perceptions of pandemic influenza vaccines. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 8(2), 275–278.
Rice, R. E., & Atkin, C. K. (2001). Public communication campaigns (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
CDC. (2012). Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women—29 States and New York City, 2009–10 season. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61(7), 113–118.
Acknowledgments
This study was partially supported by a Kaiser Permanente Georgia community benefits grant and a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Grant 5P01TP000300 to the Emory Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Center, Emory University (Atlanta, Georgia). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC. The authors would like to offer our gratitude to Drs. Robert Davis and Ruth Berkelman, and to Ms. Ellen Whitney, for their support and guidance throughout this study.
Conflict of interest
No competing financial interests exist.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marsh, H.A., Malik, F., Shapiro, E. et al. Message Framing Strategies to Increase Influenza Immunization Uptake Among Pregnant African American Women. Matern Child Health J 18, 1639–1647 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1404-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1404-9