Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The inadequacies of musculoskeletal education

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adequate knowledge and clinical competency are essential for sound rheumatology practice. The aim of this study was the assessment of the adequacy of rheumatology education at the primary care level. Two hundred and ninety-seven primary care physicians participated in this cross-sectional survey. Participants were asked to complete a question survey and to take a previously validated rheumatology examination. The participants rated rheumatology education as important but rated the time spent on rheumatology education as poor. More than 80% of the participants reported a low level of confidence in performing a musculoskeletal physical examination. Of the participants, 75% scored 65% or less in the validated rheumatology examination. The findings of the present study indicate that medical education in rheumatology is inadequate at both the basic and clinical levels. The competence level of graduating physicians in musculoskeletal problem solving is inadequate. Furthermore, the time devoted to rheumatology education and training is disproportionately low compared to the frequency of musculoskeletal complaints encountered in general practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dequeker J, Rasker JJ, Woolf AD (2000) Educational issues in rheumatology. Ballieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 14:715–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weinstein SL (2000) 2000–2010: the bone and joint decade. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82(1):1–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Woolf AD, Akesson K (2001) Understanding the burden of musculoskeletal conditions. The burden is huge and not reflected in national health priorities. BMJ 322(7294):1079–1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clawson DK, Jackson DW, Ostergaard DJ (2001) Its past time to reform the musculoskeletal curriculum. Acad Med 176:709–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Katz BP, Li W, Stewart KD (1993) Therapeutic strategies distinguish primary care physicians from rheumatologists in the management of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 20:80–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glazier RH, Dalby DM, Badley EM, Hawker GA et al (1996) Determinants of physician confidence in primary care management of musculoskeletal disorders. J Rheumatol 23:351–356

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB (2005) Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med 142:260–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ben-David MF (2000) AMEE guide No 18. Standard setting in student assessment. Med Teach 22:120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Spitzer WO, Harth M, Goldsmith CH, Norman GR, Dickie GL, Bass MJ, Newell JP (1976) The arthritic complaint in primary care: prevalence, related disability, and cost. J Rheumatol 3:88–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahern MJ, Soden M, Schultz D, Clark M (1999) The musculoskeletal examination: a neglected clinical skill. Aust N ZJ Med 21:303–306

    Google Scholar 

  11. Day CS, Yeh AC (2008) Evidence of educational inadequacies in region-specific musculoskeletal medicine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2542–2547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones JK (2001) An evaluation of medical school education in musculoskeletal medicine at the University of the West Indies, Barbados. West Indian Med J 50:66–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lynch JR, Gardner GC, Parsons RR (2005) Musculoskeletal workload versus musculoskeletal clinical confidence among primary care physicians in rural practice. Am J Orthop 34(10):487–491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matheny JM, Brinker MR, Elliot MN, Blake R, Rowane MP (2000) Confidence of graduating family practice residents in their management of musculoskeletal conditions. Am J Orthop 29(12):945–952

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sneiderman C (1977) Orthopedic practice and training of family physicians: a survey of 302 North Carolina practitioners. J Fam Pract 4(2):247–250

    Google Scholar 

  16. DiCaprio MR, Covey A, Bernstein J (2003) Curricular requirements for musculoskeletal medicine in American medical schools. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:565–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Freedman KB, Bernstein J (1998) The adequacy of medical school education in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(10):1421–1427

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Badley EM, Lee J (1987) The consultant's role in continuing medical education of general practitioners: the case of rheumatology. BMJ 20:100–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmale GA (2005) More evidence of educational inadequacies in musculoskeletal medicine. Clin Orthop 437:251–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Booth A, Wise DI (1990) General practice training in musculoskeletal disorders. Br J Gen Pract 40(338):390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolumar F, Ruiz MT, Hernandez I, Pascual E (1994) Reliability of the diagnosis of rheumatic conditions at the primary health care level. J Rheumatol 21:2344–2348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Abou-Raya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abou-Raya, A., Abou-Raya, S. The inadequacies of musculoskeletal education. Clin Rheumatol 29, 1121–1126 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1527-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1527-y

Keywords

Navigation