Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Blog
    • Feedback
    • Alerts
    • eLetters
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • RCGP Bookshop
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • RCGP Bookshop
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog

BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Blog
    • Feedback
    • Alerts
    • eLetters

BJGP Open: championing global primary health care

Prognosis after a diagnosis of heart failure:
review of the evidence

Heart after heart attack. Gamma scanning used to assess a 74-year-old man's heart following a heart attack (myocardial infarction). 12 coloured gamma scans (upper left) show blood uptake by the heart muscle, ranging from adequate (red) to inadequate (blue). A graph (upper right) shows the ejection fraction (EF) of the heart (the amount of blood it is pumping) to be an adequate 55%. The four models along bottom (based on gamma scanning) show four different parameters of heart function. Ischaemia (reduced blood flow) has been diagnosed for some areas of this heart. Radioactive tracers were used to label the blood and track its uptake by heart muscle by detecting its emissions of gamma rays. Credit: ZEPHYR/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARYThere are 900 000 people in the UK with heart failure. Jones and colleagues bring together the research on prognosis to help guide primary care physicians with timely conversations around treatment and management expectations. The epidemiological evidence shows a 1-year survival of 80–90%, dropping to 50–60% at
5 years. It has been shown that increasing age, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, raised naturietic peptides, and poor kidney function all worsen prognosis. While the evidence suggests improving rates of prescribing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction there are still significant numbers who are not on optimal doses of disease-modifying medication.

BJGP OpenLatest articles

Alerts

RSS

BJGP Open is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online-only journal of primary care, which publishes original research and other articles of importance to primary care clinicians, researchers and teachers worldwide. Read more About BJGP Open.
Also visit BJGP our leading journal of primary care.

Submit an article

Highlights

  • The transgender patient in primary care: practical advice for a 10-minute consultation
    11 July 2017
  • Multimorbidity, disadvantage, and patient engagement within a specialist homeless health service in...
    11 July 2017
  • Patients’ attitudes and perceptions towards treatment of hypothyroidism in general practice: an in-...
    27 June 2017
  • Effective management of depression in primary care: a review of the literature
    27 June 2017
  • GPs’ views and experiences of prescribing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a qualitative study
    30 May 2017
  • Is uncertain vulvovaginal candidiasis a marker of vulvodynia? A study in a Dutch general practice...
    30 May 2017
  • The effect of Dr Google on doctor–patient encounters in primary care: a quantitative, observational...
    16 May 2017
  • Use of family practice journals in Journal Clubs: a study from the Middle East
    16 May 2017

Latest Articles

  • Prognosis following a diagnosis of heart failure and the role of primary care: a review of the literature
    Nicholas R Jones, et al
    BJGP Open 11 July 2017; BJGP-2016-0641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X101013
  • The transgender patient in primary care: practical advice for a 10-minute consultation
    Charlotte Cliffe, et al
    BJGP Open 11 July 2017; BJGP-2017-0103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X101001
  • Multimorbidity, disadvantage, and patient engagement within a specialist homeless health service in the UK: an in-depth study of general practice data
    Anton B Queen, et al
    BJGP Open 11 July 2017; BJGP-2016-0641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X100941
Load morepublished ahead of print articles

Highlights

Management of hypothyroidism: what patients really think

Managing hypothyroidism: what patients really thinkPatients with hypothyroidism often have a low understanding of their condition and the consequences of inadequate thyroid hormone replacement: so found Dew and colleagues in a qualitative study using in-depth interviews. The most commonly experienced symptom was tiredness and people who had obvious pre-diagnosis symptoms had a heightened perception of the threat and they reported excellent adherence to treatment regimes. People who had persistent symptoms despite normal blood TSH concentration often felt that this was a barrier to getting their GPs to address their problems and they lacked the authority to challenge their GPs.

GPs weigh multiple complex factors to reduce risk from NSAIDs

GPs weigh multiple complex factors to reduce risk from NSAIDsWith further evidence emerging on cardiovascular harms McDonald and colleagues explored GPs’ concerns in a qualitative study from New Zealand about managing the significant risks associated with prescribing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) medications. GPs were particularly concerned about long-term use, the risks in children and in older people, and in people with comorbidities. GPs considered gastric, cardiac, and renal risks as well as drug interactions and the need to find strategies to mitigate harms. GPs were also aware of the need to balance patient expectations and the fact NSAIDs are available over-the-counter.

How do GPs recognise sepsis in primary care?

How do GPs recognise sepsis in primary care?The importance of swift diagnosis and prompt management of sepsis has received much recent attention. This study surveyed a random sample of Dutch GPs and found that decisions around referral to hospital with concerns about sepsis were complex. Decisions involved analysis of vital signs but GPs also use additional aspects of the consultation. These include the history, alteration in mental status, patients who were unable to stand up, response to previous antibiotics, use of immunosuppressives, and gut feeling. This study also suggests GPs may underestimate advanced age, alcohol-related conditions, and psychotic disorders as risk factors for sepsis.

  • eLetters
  • Most Read
Loading
RE: Recognition of sepsis in primary care: a survey among GPs
Telehealth innovation in Brazil
SAPC welcomes BJGP Open
Primary care in the Calais Jungle
Intussusception following rotavirus vaccination
View all eLetters

Altmetric Data

Altmetric tracks attention and engagement of scholarly articles.The following list shows the articles most frequently shared in social media over the past six months.

  • The effect of Dr Google on doctor–patient encounters in primary care: a quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study
    Last mentioned on Mon Jul 17 2017
  • Suffering and hope: Helen Lester Memorial Lecture 2016
    Last mentioned on Fri Mar 17 2017
  • Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of childhood eczema in primary care: cross-sectional study
    Last mentioned on Fri May 19 2017
  • More »
Tweets by @BJGPjournal
 
 

British Journal of General Practice

Back to top

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • RCGP Bookshop
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Blog
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44(0) 20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2017 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795